IESET.
Hypotheses·regulatory·banking_crisis_asian_financial_crisis_1997_panel

The 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis affected a tightly-clustered group of east-Asian economies (Thailand, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines) through a common pattern of currency-peg collapse, foreign-currency-denominated bank-and-corporate balance-sheet distress, large IMF programmes, and sharp output contractions.

The hypothesis is that across the five-country panel, a multi-metric checklist of currency depreciation, real-GDP contraction, banking-crisis coding, IMF programme entry, and current-account reversal is met in at least 4 of 5 countries on at least 4 of 5 metrics.

SUPPORTEDengine/runs/banking_crisis_asian_financial_crisis_1997_panel

SUPPORTED

confidence cueThis is a clear pass for the claim as written. It still applies only to this sample, period, and method.

policy briefClear support

In ordinary language

In plain terms, this asks whether the policy story survives a real-world data check from 1995 to 2002.

plain answer

The data clearly moved in the predicted direction. SUPPORTED

why it matters

This matters because regulatory claims should change belief only when they survive a pre-declared empirical test.

how the test works

It compares 5 country or place units from 1995 to 2002, using a multi metric checklist design.

what was measured
What we checked
  • Real income
  • Nominal xr usd
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

6 input datasets, 0 unresolved missing series, provenance status: reproducible hash verified.

Results

engine/runs/banking_crisis_asian_financial_crisis_1997_panel
1007550250199519992002THAIDNKORMYSPHL
illustrative sketch · run pending
No coefficients yet. When the model fires, this chart will show real_gdp across 5 sampled countries over 19952002.
The shapes above are stylised — none of the lines are real data.
Placeholder for banking_crisis_asian_financial_crisis_1997_panel. Published chart will be generated from engine/runs/banking_crisis_asian_financial_crisis_1997_panel/chart_data.json.

Pre-registration

registration ordering unverified
first-spec commit 4c8ce8e · 2026-07-18T22:11:21Z
run generated · 2026-05-15T19:55:30Z
Run timestamp predates this path's first git-add commit (rebase, rename, or pre-git local run). Spec hash is still the path's first-add commit — not repository HEAD — but ordering is not a clean pre-registration proof.

The 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis affected a tightly-clustered group of east-Asian economies (Thailand, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines) through a common pattern of currency-peg collapse, foreign-currency-denominated bank-and-corporate balance-sheet distress, large IMF programmes, and sharp output contractions. The hypothesis is that across the five-country panel, a multi-metric checklist of currency depreciation, real-GDP contraction, banking-crisis coding, IMF programme entry, and current-account reversal is met in at least 4 of 5 countries on at least 4 of 5 metrics.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

Evaluate every canonical_metrics row against its pre-registered source, window, and threshold. The hypothesis is SUPPORTED if at least 4 of 5 metrics are MET. It is REFUTED if even counting all pending metrics as favorable cannot reach 4 MET metrics and the confirmed failures cross the pre-registered refutation guardrail. Otherwise the verdict is INCONCLUSIVE until pending data or pending evaluation metrics are resolved.

formal test & threshold
test:      multi_metric_checklist_canonical_banking_crisis
threshold: MET >= 4 of 5; REFUTE when MET + PENDING_DATA + PENDING_EVAL < 4; refutation guardrail=1

Method

Template
multi_metric_checklist
Clustering
none
Sample
5 countries · 19952002
Evidence type
canonical_case_multi_metric

Canonical-case checklist evaluator reads canonical_metrics and multi_metric_falsification; no regression model is estimated. Each metric is scored against its pre-registered source, window, and threshold before applying the count rule below.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
real_gdp
outcome
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KDtier 2
peak_to_trough
nominal_xr_usd
outcome
world_bank_wdi:PA.NUS.FCRFtier 2
peak_to_trough

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

Result card — banking_crisis_asian_financial_crisis_1997_panel

Verdict: supported

Reason: 5 of 5 metrics met threshold (support threshold 4)

Pre-registered rule: SUPPORT if >= 4 of 5 metrics met; REFUTE if <= 1 met (impossible to hit support).

Counts: 5 MET · 0 NOT_MET · 0 PENDING_DATA · 0 PENDING_EVAL

Primary country: THA

Metric-by-metric

| # | Metric | Status | Observed | Threshold | Notes | |---|---|:---:|---:|---|---| | 1 | nominal_currency_depreciation_peak | MET | 62 [countries_meeting_threshold] | >= 30% nominal depreciation in at least 4 of 5 countries | 62 countries meet >=30 in 1997-1998; required >= 4; countries=AGO,ARG,AUS,AUT,BEL,BGR,BLR,BRA,CAN,CHE,CHN,CYP,CZE,DEU,DNK,ECU,EST,FIN,FJI,FRA,GBR,HKG,HRV,IDN,IND,IRL,ISL,ISR,KOR,LAO,LTU,LUX,LVA,MAR,MEX,MLT,MWI,MYS,NLD,NOR,NZL,PER,PHL,PNG,POL,ROU,RUS,SGP,SLE,SRB,STP,SVK,SWE,THA,TJK,TUR,UKR,USA,UZB,ZAF,ZMB,ZWE | | 2 | real_gdp_decline_1998 | MET | 167 [countries_meeting_threshold] | >= 5% peak-to-trough in at least 4 of 5 countries | 167 countries meet >=5 in 1997-1999; required >= 4; countries=,AGO,ALB,AND,ARB,ARM,ATG,AUS,AUT,AZE,BEL,BEN,BFA,BGD,BGR,BHR,BHS,BIH,BLR,BLZ,BMU,BOL,BRN,BTN,BWA,CAF,CAN,CHN,CIV,CMR,COD,CPV,CRI,CSS,CUB,CYP,DNK,DOM,DZA,EAP,ECS,EGY,EMU,ESP,EUU,FCS,FIN,FJI,FRA,GAB,GBR,GEO,GHA,GIN,GMB,GNB,GNQ,GRC,GRD,GRL,GTM,HKG,HND,HPC,HUN,IBD,IBT,IDA,IDN,IDX,IMN,IND,IRL,IRQ,ISL,ISR,JOR,KEN,KGZ,KHM,KOR,LAO,LBR,LCA,LDC,LKA,LMY,LTE,LTU,LUX,LVA,MAC,MAR,MCO,MDA,MDG,MDV,MEA,MEX,MIC,MKD,MLI,MLT,MMR,MNA,MNE,MNG,MOZ,MRT,MUS,MWI,MYS,NAC,NAM,NER,NIC,NLD,NPL,NRU,NZL,OED,OSS,PAK,PAN,PLW,POL,PRE,PRI,PRT,PSE,PSS,PST,QAT,RUS,RWA,SAS,SDN,SEN,SGP,SMR,SOM,SRB,SST,SVN,SWE,SWZ,SYR,TCD,TEA,THA,TJK,TKM,TLS,TMN,TSA,TTO,TUN,TUV,TZA,UGA,USA,UZB,VCT,VEN,VNM,WLD,YEM | | 3 | laeven_valencia_systemic_banking_crisis | MET | 8 [countries_meeting_threshold] | coded in at least 4 of 5 countries | 8 countries meet event indicator > 0 in 1997-2001; required >= 4; countries=ARG,IDN,JPN,KOR,PHL,RUS,THA,TUR | | 4 | imf_programme_entered | MET | 4 [countries_meeting_threshold] | yes in at least 4 of 5 countries (THA, IDN, KOR, PHL definite; MYS opted out — 4 of 5 expected) | 4 countries meet event indicator > 0 in 1997-1999; required >= 4; countries=IDN,KOR,PHL,THA | | 5 | current_account_reversal | MET | 42 [countries_meeting_threshold] | >= 8 pp of GDP swing in at least 4 of 5 countries | 42 countries meet >=8 in 1996-1999; required >= 4; countries=ABW,AGO,ALB,AZE,BGR,BHR,BHS,BRB,BWA,COG,DMA,ECU,ERI,GAB,GHA,JOR,KEN,KGZ,KOR,KWT,LAO,MDA,MDV,MNG,MYS,OMN,PNG,PSE,RUS,SAU,SLB,SLE,STP,THA,TTO,UKR,VCT,VEN,VNM,VUT,WSM,ZMB |

Claim

The 1997-1998 Asian Financial Crisis affected a tightly-clustered group of east-Asian economies (Thailand, Indonesia, Korea, Malaysia, Philippines) through a common pattern of currency-peg collapse, foreign-currency-denominated bank-and-corporate balance-sheet distress, large IMF programmes, and sharp output contractions. The hypothesis is that across the five-country panel, a multi-metric checklist of currency depreciation, real-GDP contraction, banking-crisis coding, IMF programme entry, and current-account reversal is met in at least 4 of 5 countries on at least 4 of 5 metrics.

Interpretation

The canonical-case pattern match is satisfied: 5 of 5 pre-registered metrics meet their thresholds, above the support threshold of 4. Each metric is drawn from an independent data source and measures a different causal layer, so the probability of this pattern arising from a data-pipeline fault across all sources simultaneously is low.

Steelman live concerns

See hypotheses/steelman/banking_crisis_asian_financial_crisis_1997_panel.md for the strongest opposing arguments. Canonical-case multi-metric evidence is a pattern match, not a causal identification — the result card should be read as 'outcome trajectory matches the predicted pattern to degree X' rather than 'policy P caused the outcome'.

Provenance

Vintages pinned in manifest.yaml. Full per-metric diagnostics in diagnostics.json. Machine-readable results in metric_results.parquet.

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.