Pre-registration
The 2008 Icelandic banking collapse (failure of Glitnir, Landsbanki, and Kaupthing in October 2008) is a canonical case of a small-open-economy systemic banking crisis driven by external-funded balance-sheet expansion exceeding any plausible lender-of- last-resort capacity. The hypothesis is that the Iceland 2008 episode meets the canonical-case checklist with extreme metric values: at least 5 of 6 pre-registered metrics (bank-assets-to-GDP, ISK depreciation, real-GDP contraction, unemployment rise, IMF programme entry, sovereign-yield spike) hit thresholds well above the cross-country GFC norm.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
Evaluate every canonical_metrics row against its pre-registered source, window, and threshold. The hypothesis is SUPPORTED if at least 5 of 6 metrics are MET. It is REFUTED if even counting all pending metrics as favorable cannot reach 5 MET metrics and the confirmed failures cross the pre-registered refutation guardrail. Otherwise the verdict is INCONCLUSIVE until pending data or pending evaluation metrics are resolved.
formal test & threshold
test: multi_metric_checklist_canonical_banking_crisis threshold: MET >= 5 of 6; REFUTE when MET + PENDING_DATA + PENDING_EVAL < 5; refutation guardrail=2
Method
- Template
multi_metric_checklist- Clustering
none- Sample
- 1 countries · 2003 – 2015
- Evidence type
- canonical_case_multi_metric
Canonical-case checklist evaluator reads canonical_metrics and multi_metric_falsification; no regression model is estimated. Each metric is scored against its pre-registered source, window, and threshold before applying the count rule below.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
real_gdp outcome | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KDtier 2 | peak_to_trough |
unemployment_rate outcome | world_bank_wdi:SL.UEM.TOTL.ZStier 2 | peak_above_baseline |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — banking_crisis_iceland_2008_canonical_multimetric
Verdict: refuted
Reason: 2 metrics failed and 0 pending; cannot reach 5
Pre-registered rule: SUPPORT if >= 5 of 6 metrics met; REFUTE if <= 2 met (impossible to hit support).
Counts: 4 MET · 2 NOT_MET · 0 PENDING_DATA · 0 PENDING_EVAL
Primary country: ISL
Metric-by-metric
| # | Metric | Status | Observed | Threshold | Notes |
|---|---|:---:|---:|---|---|
| 1 | bank_assets_to_gdp_peak | NOT_MET | 243 (2007) [max_in_window_fallback] | >= 700% of GDP | |
| 2 | krona_depreciation_2008_2009 | MET | 169 (2007) [max_in_window_fallback] | >= 50% nominal depreciation peak-to-trough | |
| 3 | real_gdp_peak_to_trough | MET | 10.4 (2010) [peak_to_trough_pct_decline] | >= 8% peak-to-trough decline | |
| 4 | unemployment_rate_rise | MET | 1.64e+03 (2008) [pct_increase_from_baseline] | >= 5 pp rise from 2007 baseline | |
| 5 | imf_stand_by_arrangement_entered | MET | 1 (2008) [yes_no_indicator_max] | yes/no — yes counts as breach | yes/no event evaluated from binary event indicator |
| 6 | sovereign_yield_spike_or_cds | NOT_MET | 12.9 (2009) [pct_increase_from_baseline] | >= 500 bp at peak | |
Claim
The 2008 Icelandic banking collapse (failure of Glitnir, Landsbanki, and Kaupthing in October 2008) is a canonical case of a small-open-economy systemic banking crisis driven by external-funded balance-sheet expansion exceeding any plausible lender-of- last-resort capacity. The hypothesis is that the Iceland 2008 episode meets the canonical-case checklist with extreme metric values: at least 5 of 6 pre-registered metrics (bank-assets-to-GDP, ISK depreciation, real-GDP contraction, unemployment rise, IMF programme entry, sovereign-yield spike) hit thresholds well above the cross-country GFC norm.
Interpretation
The canonical-case pattern match is not satisfied: only 4 of 6 metrics met their thresholds, below the support threshold of 5. Note that for canonical-case hypotheses, a refutation can indicate either that the hypothesis is genuinely weak, that the metric set is mis-calibrated (too strict), or that the data substrate has systematic gaps. Review the PENDING_DATA / PENDING_EVAL metrics before accepting the refutation.
Steelman live concerns
See hypotheses/steelman/banking_crisis_iceland_2008_canonical_multimetric.md for the strongest opposing arguments. Canonical-case multi-metric evidence is a pattern match, not a causal identification — the result card should be read as 'outcome trajectory matches the predicted pattern to degree X' rather than 'policy P caused the outcome'.
Provenance
Vintages pinned in manifest.yaml. Full per-metric diagnostics in diagnostics.json. Machine-readable results in metric_results.parquet.
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.