Pre-registration
In the Schularick-Taylor cross-country macrohistory panel restricted to the post-1980 era, sustained acceleration of bank credit to the private non-financial sector relative to GDP raises the conditional probability of a systemic banking crisis within a five-year forward window. Specifically, country-years in the top quintile of 5-year change in bank-credit-to-GDP carry banking-crisis hazard at least 2x the baseline hazard in the rest of the panel. The mechanism is endogenous: credit-boom-bust cycles, not exogenous external shocks, are the dominant driver of post-1980 banking crises across advanced economies.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if the odds ratio of forward-5y-banking-crisis on the top-quintile credit- change indicator is >= 2.0 with p < 0.05 in country+year FE panel logit on the post- 1980 sample. PARTIAL if odds ratio in [1.3, 2.0) with p < 0.05. REFUTED if odds ratio < 1.3 or p > 0.10. METHOD_VALID requires at least 14 of 19 countries with usable BIS credit + Laeven-Valencia coding 1980-2020.
formal test & threshold
test: panel_logit_country_year_fe threshold: OR_credit_boom_top_q5_5y_forward_crisis >= 2.0 at p < 0.05
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 19 countries · 1980 – 2020
- Evidence type
- associational
Country and year fixed-effects panel logit on 5-year-forward banking-crisis indicator with credit-boom top-quintile flag as treatment. Robustness: continuous credit-gap specification; Schularick-Taylor 2012 replication restricted to post-1980 sample.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
systemic_banking_crisis_indicator outcome | owid:systemic-banking-crisestier 2 | binary_year_level |
forward_5y_crisis_hazard outcome | owid:systemic-banking-crisestier 2 | indicator_at_least_one_crisis_in_t_to_t_plus_5 |
credit_boom_5y_change_top_quintile treatment | bis:WS_TCtier 2 | change_5y_top_quintile_indicator |
bank_credit_to_gdp treatment | world_bank_wdi:FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZStier 2 | level_pct_of_gdp |
real_gdp_growth control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZGtier 2 | yoy_pct |
current_account_balance control | world_bank_wdi:BN.CAB.XOKA.GD.ZStier 2 | level_pct_of_gdp |
real_interest_rate control | world_bank_wdi:FR.INR.RINRtier 2 | level |
jst_cpi control | jst:cpitier 3 | yoy_pct |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — banking_crisis_schularick_taylor_credit_boom_panel_post1980
Verdict: SUPPORTED — coef=+0.001376 (sign matches claim +), p=9.27e-07
Pre-registration
- Claim: In the Schularick-Taylor cross-country macrohistory panel restricted to the post-1980 era, sustained acceleration of bank credit to the private non-financial sector relative to GDP raises the conditional probability of a systemic banking crisis within a five-year forward window. Specifically, country-years in the top quintile of 5-year change in bank-credit-to-GDP carry banking-crisis hazard at least 2x the baseline hazard in the rest of the panel. The mechanism is endogenous: credit-boom-bust cycles, not exogenous external shocks, are the dominant driver of post-1980 banking crises across advanced economies.
- Falsification rule: SUPPORTED if the odds ratio of forward-5y-banking-crisis on the top-quintile credit- change indicator is >= 2.0 with p < 0.05 in country+year FE panel logit on the post- 1980 sample. PARTIAL if odds ratio in [1.3, 2.0) with p < 0.05. REFUTED if odds ratio < 1.3 or p > 0.10. METHOD_VALID requires at least 14 of 19 countries with usable BIS credit + Laeven-Valencia coding 1980-2020.
- Falsification test: panel_logit_country_year_fe
Estimate
- Method: linearmodels.PanelOLS
- Coefficient (treatment): +0.001376
- Std error: 0.0002715
- p-value: 9.27e-07
- Observations: 250, countries: 10
- Within R²: -0.0683
- Fixed effects: entity=True, time=True
- Clustering: country
Variables resolved
owid:systemic-banking-crises→ systemic_banking_crisis_indicator (outcome, publisher=owid, n=2766)owid:systemic-banking-crises→ forward_5y_crisis_hazard (outcome, publisher=owid, n=2766)bis:WS_TC→ credit_boom_5y_change_top_quintile (treatment, publisher=bis, n=1914)world_bank_wdi:FS.AST.PRVT.GD.ZS→ bank_credit_to_gdp (treatment, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=9562)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG→ real_gdp_growth (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=13897)world_bank_wdi:BN.CAB.XOKA.GD.ZS→ current_account_balance (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=7621)world_bank_wdi:FR.INR.RINR→ real_interest_rate (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=4694)jst:cpi→ jst_cpi (controls, publisher=jst, n=2718)
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:54:27+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.