Pre-registration
El Salvador's second Bukele term (post-2024 inauguration, with continued régimen-de-excepción and worsening institutional-quality scores) maintains FDI inflows, GDP growth, and tourism arrivals trajectories established in 2019-2024 despite mounting authoritarianism critique (V-Dem electoral-democracy decline, WGI rule-of-law score continuing to fall, Freedom House "partly free" downgrade). The hypothesis tests the institutional-quality-as-binding-constraint prediction: standard FDI literature (Daude-Stein 2007, Globerman-Shapiro 2003) implies that past a threshold, rule-of-law deterioration deters FDI. The pre-registered test asks whether the SLV growth/FDI premium relative to Central American peers persists or reverses in the 2024Q3-2026Q4 window when the rule-of-law trajectory has been negative for 5+ consecutive years.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
Refuted (institutional-quality binding constraint VERIFIED) if SLV FDI-share-of-GDP CATT over 2024Q3-2026Q4 is significantly negative versus the synthetic counterfactual at p < 0.10 permutation inference, OR if the continuous-rule-of-law-decline coefficient on FDI is significantly negative across the SLV trajectory. Supported (institutional-quality channel NOT binding for SLV in this window) if both tests are non-negative and the FDI trajectory remains within or above the synthetic-counterfactual band.
formal test & threshold
test: synth_did_phase2_rule_of_law_binding_test threshold: FDI CATT 2024Q3-2026Q4 not significantly negative AND rule-of-law-decline coefficient on FDI not significantly negative
Method
- Template
synth_did- Clustering
country- Sample
- 7 countries · 2019 – 2026
- Evidence type
- causal
Primary: synth_did with SLV treated from 2024Q3 (post-Bukele-second-inauguration), Central American peer pool. Secondary: continuous-treatment specification with cumulative-rule-of-law-decline as the treatment intensity, testing whether more-deteriorated institutional quality is associated with FDI deceleration.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
fdi_inflow_share_gdp outcome | world_bank_wdi:BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZStier 2 unctad:Worldtier 2 | level |
real_gdp_quarterly outcome | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KDtier 2 sv_bcr:pib_real_quarterlytier 2 | log_level_quarterly |
tourism_arrivals outcome | world_bank_wdi:ST.INT.ARVLtier 2 sv_mitur:visitor_arrivalstier 3 | log_level_annual |
sovereign_credit_spread outcome | jp_morgan_embi:SLVtier 2 | basis_points |
bukele_phase2_indicator treatment | constructed:binary = 1 for SLV from 2024-06-01 onwardtier 5 | binary |
wgi_rule_of_law control | wgi:GOV_WGI_RL.ESTtier 4 | level |
vdem_electoral_democracy control | vdem:v2x_polyarchytier 4 | level |
freedom_house_status control | freedom_house:FIW_statustier 4 | ordinal |
us_policy_rate control | fred:FEDFUNDStier 1 | level |
remittance_share_gdp control | world_bank_wdi:BX.TRF.PWKR.DT.GD.ZStier 2 | level |
homicide_rate_log control | unodc:intentional_homicidetier 2 | log_level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — bukele_phase2_post_2024_authoritarian_growth_premium
Verdict: PARTIAL — mean_gap=-0.3577, |gap|/pre_sd=0.051, p_perm=0.143 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)
Pre-registration
- Claim: El Salvador's second Bukele term (post-2024 inauguration, with continued régimen-de-excepción and worsening institutional-quality scores) maintains FDI inflows, GDP growth, and tourism arrivals trajectories established in 2019-2024 despite mounting authoritarianism critique (V-Dem electoral-democracy decline, WGI rule-of-law score continuing to fall, Freedom House "partly free" downgrade). The hypothesis tests the institutional-quality-as-binding-constraint prediction: standard FDI literature (Daude-Stein 2007, Globerman-Shapiro 2003) implies that past a threshold, rule-of-law deterioration deters FDI. The pre-registered test asks whether the SLV growth/FDI premium relative to Central American peers persists or reverses in the 2024Q3-2026Q4 window when the rule-of-law trajectory has been negative for 5+ consecutive years.
- Falsification rule: Refuted (institutional-quality binding constraint VERIFIED) if SLV FDI-share-of-GDP CATT over 2024Q3-2026Q4 is significantly negative versus the synthetic counterfactual at p < 0.10 permutation inference, OR if the continuous-rule-of-law-decline coefficient on FDI is significantly negative across the SLV trajectory. Supported (institutional-quality channel NOT binding for SLV in this window) if both tests are non-negative and the FDI trajectory remains within or above the synthetic-counterfactual band.
Synthetic-control estimate
- shape: synth_did
- treated_country: SLV
- event_year: 2024
- n_donors: 6
- donor_weights (top): {'HND': 0.9553, 'NIC': 0.04, 'GTM': 0.0046, 'CRI': 0.0, 'PAN': 0.0}
- pre_rmse: 0.6587059996724473
- pre_period_sd: 7.0311449992159885
- mean_post_gap: -0.3577212491353971
- end_period_gap: -0.022798620977266815
- post_period_years: [2024, 2026]
- placebo_p_value: 0.14285714285714285
- n_placebos: 6
- method: synthetic-control via NNLS, permutation inference
Variables resolved
imf:NGDP_R; world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD; sv_bcr:pib_real_quarterly→ real_gdp_quarterly (outcome, n=10914)wgi:GOV_WGI_RL.EST→ wgi_rule_of_law (controls, n=5322)
Generated by scripts/run_synth_did.py at 2026-04-30T10:15:30+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
Phase-2 distinction from the 2019-2024 hypothesis is critical: the early Bukele term combined rapid security-channel improvement (homicide collapse) with rule-of-law deterioration, so the net FDI signal could be ambiguous. By 2024-2026 the security channel has saturated (homicides at floor) while the rule-of-law deterioration has accumulated. If FDI continues to grow in this later window, the hypothesis "institutional-quality channel is not binding" is supported. If FDI plateaus or reverses, the hypothesis is refuted and the Bukele growth story is reframed as a one-time security-channel effect that does not generalise.