Pre-registration
Higher government consumption predicts lower private investment if crowding out dominates.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
Supported if the coefficient on gov_consumption has sign - and p <= 0.10; refuted if significant in the opposite direction.
formal test & threshold
test: cross_school_gov_consumption_private_investment_crowding_1990_2023 threshold: sign(gov_consumption)=- and p<=0.10
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 99 countries · 1990 – 2023
- Evidence type
- associational
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
private_investment outcome | world_bank_wdi:NE.GDI.FPRV.ZStier 2 | level |
gov_consumption treatment | world_bank_wdi:NE.CON.GOVT.ZStier 2 | level |
gdp_pc_growth control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZGtier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — cross_school_gov_consumption_private_investment_crowding_1990_2023
Verdict: PARTIAL — coef=+0.03236, p=0.828 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
Pre-registration
- Claim: Higher government consumption predicts lower private investment if crowding out dominates.
- Falsification rule: Supported if the coefficient on gov_consumption has sign - and p <= 0.10; refuted if significant in the opposite direction.
- Falsification test: cross_school_gov_consumption_private_investment_crowding_1990_2023
Estimate
- Method: linearmodels.PanelOLS
- Coefficient (treatment): +0.03236
- Std error: 0.1489
- p-value: 0.828
- Observations: 1745, countries: 78
- Within R²: 0.00984
- Fixed effects: entity=True, time=True
- Clustering: country
Variables resolved
world_bank_wdi:NE.GDI.FPRV.ZS→ private_investment (outcome, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=3304)world_bank_wdi:NE.CON.GOVT.ZS→ gov_consumption (treatment, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=9133)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG→ gdp_pc_growth (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=13897)
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:52:19+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
School coverage focus: post_keynesian, austrian. Generated and run by scripts/promote_cross_school_next50_2026_05_12.py.