Pre-registration
Brazil's demographic transition 1980-2023 (TFR fall from ~4.0 to ~1.6) coincides with inequality decline post-2000 (Gini from ~0.60 to ~0.53). The hypothesis tests whether working-age-share rise contributed to inequality decline via labour-market tightening at the bottom of the wage distribution. The mechanism predicts a negative association between working-age share and Gini, partially mediated by minimum-wage real-value gains.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if working-age-share coefficient is negative on Gini at p<0.10 and demographic channel accounts for at least 15% of post-2000 Gini decline. REFUTED if working-age share is wrong-signed, insignificant, or attributable share < 5%.
formal test & threshold
test: time_series_brazil_demographic_inequality_decomp threshold: coef_wap < 0 AND p < 0.10 AND demographic_share_of_gini_decline >= 0.15
Method
- Template
panel_fe_decomposition- Sample
- 1 countries · 1980 – 2023
- Evidence type
- associational
Brazil time series, decomposition of Gini change into demographic, minimum-wage, and productivity channels; report fraction of post-2000 Gini decline attributable to demographic vs minimum-wage policy contributions.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
gini_disposable_income outcome | world_bank_wdi:SI.POV.GINItier 2 | level |
working_age_population_share treatment | world_bank_wdi:SP.POP.1564.TO.ZStier 2 | level |
real_minimum_wage channel | ilostat:UNE_2EAP_SEX_AGE_RT_Atier 2 | log |
lfp_total channel | world_bank_wdi:SL.TLF.CACT.ZStier 2 | level |
labour_productivity control | pwt:rgdpo_per_emptier 3 | log |
gdp_per_capita_ppp control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KDtier 2 | log |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — demo_brazil_demographic_transition_inequality
Verdict: PARTIAL — coef=+1.172, p=0.208 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
Pre-registration
- Claim: Brazil's demographic transition 1980-2023 (TFR fall from ~4.0 to ~1.6) coincides with inequality decline post-2000 (Gini from ~0.60 to ~0.53). The hypothesis tests whether working-age-share rise contributed to inequality decline via labour-market tightening at the bottom of the wage distribution. The mechanism predicts a negative association between working-age share and Gini, partially mediated by minimum-wage real-value gains.
- Falsification rule: SUPPORTED if working-age-share coefficient is negative on Gini at p<0.10 and demographic channel accounts for at least 15% of post-2000 Gini decline. REFUTED if working-age share is wrong-signed, insignificant, or attributable share < 5%.
- Falsification test: time_series_brazil_demographic_inequality_decomp
Estimate
- Method: statsmodels OLS time-series fallback
- Coefficient (treatment): +1.172
- Std error: 0.9312
- p-value: 0.208
- Observations: 25, countries: 1
- Within R²: 0.831
- Fixed effects: entity=False, time=False
- Clustering: HAC(maxlags=4)
Variables resolved
world_bank_wdi:SI.POV.GINI→ gini_disposable_income (outcome, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=2430)world_bank_wdi:SP.POP.1564.TO.ZS→ working_age_population_share (treatment, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=16965)ilostat:UNE_2EAP_SEX_AGE_RT_A→ real_minimum_wage (decomposition_channels, publisher=ilostat, n=10188)world_bank_wdi:SL.TLF.CACT.ZS→ lfp_total (decomposition_channels, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=8302)pwt:rgdpo_per_emp→ labour_productivity (controls, publisher=pwt, n=9529)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD→ gdp_per_capita_ppp (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=8325)
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:48:34+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.