Pre-registration
France absorbed approximately 800,000-1,000,000 pied-noir repatriates from Algeria in 1962-1963, equivalent to roughly 2% of the French population. The hypothesis tests whether the rapid inflow caused (a) measurable labour-market disruption in destination regions over 1962-1970, and (b) whether absorption was relatively rapid (within 10 years) by per-capita-output and employment-rate metrics, supporting the Hunt (1992) finding of fast convergence.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if French per-capita growth and unemployment trajectories show no significant deviation from pre-event trend within 10 years (Hunt 1992 pattern), with deviation confidence band including zero. REFUTED if a sustained negative deviation in per-capita growth or sustained unemployment-rise persists past 1972.
formal test & threshold
test: event_study_pied_noir_absorption_1962 threshold: deviation_10yr_p > 0.05 AND no_persistent_unemployment_rise
Method
- Template
event_study- Sample
- 1 countries · 1955 – 1980
- Evidence type
- descriptive
Single-country event-study around 1962-1963; report deviation from pre-event trajectory in GDP-per-capita growth and unemployment. Pre-period 1955-1961, event 1962-1963, post-period 1964-1972.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
real_gdp_per_capita_growth outcome | maddison:mpd2020tier 3 | yoy_log_diff |
unemployment_rate outcome | world_bank_wdi:SL.UEM.TOTL.ZStier 2 | level |
pied_noir_event_indicator treatment | constructed:indicator pulses 1962-1963; population-share inflow ~2%.tier 5 | indicator |
real_gdp_growth_total control | maddison:mpd2020tier 3 | yoy_log_diff |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.