Pre-registration
Across OECD countries 1990-2023, the median gender pay gap has narrowed but the rate of narrowing has slowed since 2010, with the residual gap concentrated in (a) parenthood penalties, (b) occupational segregation, and (c) hours-of-work differences. The hypothesis documents the OECD median pay-gap trajectory, tests whether the post-2010 slowdown is statistically significant against the 1990-2010 trend, and reports cross-country variation.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if (a) OECD-median gender pay gap declines by at least 5pp 1990-2023, AND (b) post-2010 trend slope (in pp/year) is significantly less negative than pre-2010 slope at p<0.10. REFUTED if median gap reduces by < 2pp or post-2010 slowdown is indistinguishable from continued trend.
formal test & threshold
test: panel_fe_pay_gap_with_slope_change_test threshold: pay_gap_reduction >= 5.0 AND post2010_slope_change_p < 0.10
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 25 countries · 1990 – 2023
- Evidence type
- descriptive
Two-way FE; report year-fixed-effect trajectory and test for slope change at 2010 (Chow-style test or interaction with post-2010 indicator).
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
median_gender_pay_gap outcome | oecd:OECD.ELS.SAEtier 2 | level |
female_lfp control | world_bank_wdi:SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZStier 2 | level |
tertiary_attainment_female control | world_bank_wdi:SE.TER.CUAT.BA.FE.ZStier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — demo_gender_pay_gap_oecd_evolution
Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — treatment 'context_inferred_treatment' has no cross-country variation within years under year fixed effects
Pre-registration
- Claim: Across OECD countries 1990-2023, the median gender pay gap has narrowed but the rate of narrowing has slowed since 2010, with the residual gap concentrated in (a) parenthood penalties, (b) occupational segregation, and (c) hours-of-work differences. The hypothesis documents the OECD median pay-gap trajectory, tests whether the post-2010 slowdown is statistically significant against the 1990-2010 trend, and reports cross-country variation.
- Falsification rule: SUPPORTED if (a) OECD-median gender pay gap declines by at least 5pp 1990-2023, AND (b) post-2010 trend slope (in pp/year) is significantly less negative than pre-2010 slope at p<0.10. REFUTED if median gap reduces by < 2pp or post-2010 slowdown is indistinguishable from continued trend.
- Falsification test: panel_fe_pay_gap_with_slope_change_test
Estimate
- Error: treatment 'context_inferred_treatment' has no cross-country variation within years under year fixed effects
Variables resolved
oecd:OECD.ELS.SAE,DSD_EARNINGS@DF_GENDER_WAGE_GAP,1.0→ median_gender_pay_gap (outcome, publisher=oecd, n=761)world_bank_wdi:SL.TLF.CACT.FE.ZS→ female_lfp (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=8302)world_bank_wdi:SE.TER.CUAT.BA.FE.ZS→ tertiary_attainment_female (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=1401)
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:48:34+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.