Pre-registration
South Korea experienced a "fertility cliff" 2015-2024 (TFR falling from ~1.24 to <0.8), globally unprecedented in peacetime. The hypothesis predicts (a) Korea's TFR decline exceeds 3 standard deviations relative to OECD-comparator decadal changes, (b) the decline is concentrated in metropolitan/Seoul cohorts, and (c) early signals of working- age contraction are visible in 2020-2024 labour-market participation among 25-34 year olds.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if Korea's TFR change 2015-2024 is at least 3 SD below comparator-panel mean decadal change AND TFR end-point < 0.85. REFUTED if Korea is within 2 SD of comparators or TFR did not fall below 0.9.
formal test & threshold
test: korea_tfr_zscore_against_comparator_panel threshold: korea_tfr_zscore <= -3.0 AND korea_tfr_2024 < 0.85
Method
- Template
descriptive- Sample
- 10 countries · 2000 – 2024
- Evidence type
- descriptive
Time-series description of Korea TFR vs comparator panel; report decadal changes and z-scores against OECD comparator distribution. No causal claim; this is a pattern-recognition spec to anchor downstream causal hypotheses.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
total_fertility_rate outcome | world_bank_wdi:SP.DYN.TFRT.INtier 2 | level |
birth_rate_crude outcome | world_bank_wdi:SP.DYN.CBRT.INtier 2 | level |
lfp_25_34_female outcome | ilostat:EAP_2WAP_SEX_AGE_RTtier 2 | level |
gdp_per_capita_ppp control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KDtier 2 | log |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.