Pre-registration
Energy-price spikes increase household distributional stress.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if treatment coefficient has the predicted sign at p<0.10; REFUTED if opposite sign at p<0.10; otherwise PARTIAL.
formal test & threshold
test: panel_fe_eurostat_energy_price_household_distribution_stress threshold: p<0.10 with pre-registered sign
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 31 countries · 2019 – 2025
- Evidence type
- associational
Short-panel throughput screen; household/distribution claims require additional local tables before running.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
distribution_stress outcome | eurostat:ilc_mdes01tier 1 | level |
household_electricity_price treatment | eurostat:nrg_pc_204tier 1 | annual_mean_level |
gdp_pc_growth control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZGtier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — eurostat_energy_price_household_distribution_stress
Verdict: PARTIAL — coef=+1.065, p=0.21 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
Pre-registration
- Claim: Energy-price spikes increase household distributional stress.
- Falsification rule: SUPPORTED if treatment coefficient has the predicted sign at p<0.10; REFUTED if opposite sign at p<0.10; otherwise PARTIAL.
- Falsification test: panel_fe_eurostat_energy_price_household_distribution_stress
Estimate
- Method: linearmodels.PanelOLS
- Coefficient (treatment): +1.065
- Std error: 0.8458
- p-value: 0.21
- Observations: 170, countries: 29
- Within R²: -0.0433
- Fixed effects: entity=True, time=True
- Clustering: country
Variables resolved
eurostat:ilc_mdes01→ distribution_stress (outcome, publisher=eurostat, n=822)eurostat:nrg_pc_204→ household_electricity_price (treatment, publisher=eurostat, n=739)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZG→ gdp_pc_growth (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=13897)
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:52:06+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.