IESET.
Hypotheses·fiscal·eurozone_austerity_distributional_incidence

Post-2008 eurozone austerity disproportionately affected households in the bottom income quintile; distributional cost was not necessary for fiscal consolidation, given alternative tax-side options.

INCONCLUSIVEengine/runs/eurozone_austerity_distributional_incidence

inconclusive (data gap) — required Eurostat distributional series missing: ['eurostat:ilc_peps01n']. Cannot test distributional incidence without ilc_di12 (Gini) and/or ilc_peps01n (at-risk-of-poverty) on disk.

confidence cueResult card produced; verdict unclassified.

policy briefCoverage too thin

In ordinary language

Over a long period, do more market-oriented institutions translate into higher income or productivity, once the comparison looks beyond a single success story?

plain answer

This test cannot make a firm call yet. required Eurostat distributional series missing: ['eurostat:ilc_peps01n'].

why it matters

This matters because fiscal claims should change belief only when they survive a pre-declared empirical test.

how the test works

It compares 11 country or place units from 2005 to 2017, using a local projections design, with fixed effects for country and year.

what was measured
What changed
  • Austerity shock narrative
  • Cyclically adjusted primary balance change
What we checked
  • Bottom quintile disposable income
  • At risk of poverty rate
  • In work poverty rate
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/eurozone_austerity_distributional_incidence
Loading chart…

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

10 schools list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

pre-registered
first-spec commit bae09ab · 2026-04-29T22:09:42Z

Post-2008 eurozone austerity disproportionately affected households in the bottom income quintile; distributional cost was not necessary for fiscal consolidation, given alternative tax-side options.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

PRIMARY (dispositive): the hypothesis is SUPPORTED if BOTH (a) the eurozone-periphery (GRC, ESP, PRT, IRL, ITA) mean within-country change in the Gini coefficient of equivalised disposable income (eurostat:ilc_di12) from 2008 to 2014 exceeds the same change in the eurozone-core (AUT, BEL, DEU, FRA, FIN, NLD) by at least +1.0 Gini points, AND (b) the periphery mean within-country change in the at-risk-of-poverty rate (eurostat:ilc_peps01n) from 2008 to 2014 exceeds the same change in the core by at least +2.0 percentage points. REFUTED if BOTH gaps are in the OPPOSITE direction (i.e. core deteriorated more) by more than half the threshold. Otherwise PARTIAL. INFORMATIVE: treatment confirmation — periphery 2008→2014 change in primary balance / GDP (imf:GGXCNL_NGDP) must exceed core change by at least +1.5pp, otherwise the periphery-core comparison cannot be treated as a treatment-vs-control contrast. METHOD_VALID: at least 4 of 5 periphery and 4 of 6 core countries have 2008 and 2014 observations on each Eurostat series; otherwise emit `inconclusive (coverage)`.

formal test & threshold
test:      eurozone_periphery_vs_core_gini_and_arop_endpoint_comparison_2008_to_2014
threshold: PRIMARY: (Δ_periphery_gini − Δ_core_gini) ≥ +1.0pp AND (Δ_periphery_arop − Δ_core_arop) ≥ +2.0pp.

Method

Template
local_projections
Fixed effects
country, year
Clustering
country
Sample
11 countries · 20052017
Evidence type
associational

Local projections of distributional outcomes (bottom-quintile income, in-work poverty, social-spending shares) on identified austerity shocks (Alesina-Favero-Giavazzi narrative; Guajardo- Leigh-Pescatori) across Eurozone periphery. Country-clustered SE.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
bottom_quintile_disposable_income
outcome
eurostat:ilc_di01tier 1
real_eur_yoy
at_risk_of_poverty_rate
outcome
eurostat:ilc_li02tier 1
pct_population
in_work_poverty_rate
outcome
eurostat:ilc_iw01tier 1
pct_employed
gini_disposable_income
outcome
eurostat:ilc_di12tier 1
wid:gini_disptier 3
level
social_protection_expenditure_pct_gdp
outcome
eurostat:spr_exp_sumtier 1
pct_gdp
austerity_shock_narrative
treatment
manual: Alesina-Favero-Giavazzi narrative austerity shocks (consolidation events, share of GDP)pct_gdp_consolidation
cyclically_adjusted_primary_balance_change
treatment
imf:GGXCNL_NGDPtier 2
oecd:underlying_primary_balancetier 2
pp_change_yoy
tax_vs_spending_consolidation_share
treatment
oecd:tax_revenuetier 2
oecd:gov_expendituretier 2
tax_share_of_consolidation_pct
real_gdp_growth
control
imf:NGDP_RPCHtier 2
eurostat:nama_10_gdptier 1
pct_yoy
unemployment_rate
control
eurostat:une_rt_atier 1
ilostat:unemployment_ratetier 2
pct_labour_force
ecb_policy_rate
control
ecb:FMtier 1
level_pct
nominal_effective_exchange_rate
control
bis:WS_EERtier 2
index_2010_100

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

eurozone_austerity_distributional_incidence

Verdict: inconclusive (data gap) — required Eurostat distributional series missing: ['eurostat:ilc_peps01n']. Cannot test distributional incidence without ilc_di12 (Gini) and/or ilc_peps01n (at-risk-of-poverty) on disk.

Method

Dispositive test requires Eurostat ilc_di12 (Gini) and ilc_peps01n (at-risk-of-poverty) for the eurozone periphery vs core comparison; one or both are not in data/vintages/eurostat/.

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Notes

Maps the democratic-socialist school's eurozone-austerity-bottom-quintile claim to a periphery-vs-core endpoint comparison on harmonised EU-SILC distributional measures. Promoted v1→v2 (2026-04-24) — original spec called for local projections on Alesina-Favero-Giavazzi narrative shocks; those shock series and ilc_di01 mean-income-by-quintile are not in vintages, so the dispositive test is reduced to a periphery-vs-core 2008→2014 endpoint comparison on Gini (ilc_di12) and at-risk-of-poverty (ilc_peps01n). The bottom-quintile-incidence claim mechanically implies both rise more in periphery than in core; treatment is confirmed informally via primary-balance change.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.