Pre-registration
Liberal democracies with binding numerical fiscal rules in place for at least 10 years over the 1976–2025 window show systematically lower (less positive, or more negative) statist-drift slopes than peers without such rules. Mechanism: fiscal rules constrain the deficit-financed transfer flywheel that public-choice theory says drives the drift; if the managerial-flywheel hypothesis is correct, then constitutional / legal caps on it should bite. The corpus already contains the inputs — every movement coded on framework axes, every fiscal-rule introduction noted in its movement YAML — so the test reduces to comparing per-decade drift slopes between rule-bound and rule-free liberal democracies.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if the median per-decade drift slope of rule-bound countries is at least 1.0 index points per decade lower than the median slope of rule-free countries, AND a one-sided Mann-Whitney U test rejects the null of equal distributions at p<0.10. PARTIAL if the median gap is in the predicted direction but does not meet the magnitude or significance threshold. REFUTED if the median slope of rule-bound countries is equal to or greater than rule-free countries.
formal test & threshold
test: two-sample comparison of per-decade drift slopes; non-parametric one-sided Mann-Whitney U threshold: median(rule-bound slopes) <= median(rule-free slopes) - 1.0 AND Mann-Whitney U p<0.10 (one-sided)
Method
- Template
descriptive- Sample
- 26 countries · 1976 – 2025
- Evidence type
- associational
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
per_decade_drift_slope outcome | constructed:from data/derived/country_drift.json (replication.py recomputes from movements/*.yaml axes_summary)tier 5 | OLS slope of cumulative composite drift on year, scaled to index points per decade |
binding_fiscal_rule_10y treatment | constructed:hand-coded from IMF Fiscal Rules Database 2022 + EU Fiscal Rules Database 2024 + national legislationtier 5 | binary: 1 if country had a binding numerical fiscal rule (debt brake, deficit ceiling, structural-balance target, debt-reduction rule) in force for at least 10 years over 1976–2025 |
log_initial_gdp_per_capita control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | log of GDP-per-capita at start of corpus window for each country (1976 or earliest available) |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — fiscal_rule_presence_dampens_statist_drift
Verdict: PARTIAL — gap is in the predicted direction (rule-bound -4.07 vs rule-free -1.10, gap -2.97) but Mann-Whitney one-sided p = 0.2357 fails to reject 0.10.
Group statistics
| Group | n | Median slope/decade | Mean slope/decade | |---|---:|---:|---:| | Rule-bound | 14 | -4.07 | -3.12 | | Rule-free | 12 | -1.10 | -1.73 | | Gap (bound − free) | | -2.97 | |
Mann-Whitney one-sided p (H1: bound < free): 0.2357
Rule-bound countries
| Country | Slope/decade | Movements | |---|---:|---:| | ITA | -11.05 | 27 | | GRC | -9.69 | 14 | | NLD | -6.66 | 18 | | FIN | -6.60 | 12 | | CZE | -5.84 | 10 | | DNK | -5.63 | 9 | | ESP | -5.02 | 15 | | HUN | -3.12 | 10 | | POL | -1.01 | 16 | | CHE | -0.58 | 3 | | SWE | -0.45 | 14 | | IRL | -0.04 | 17 | | AUT | +4.02 | 15 | | DEU | +7.97 | 20 |
Rule-free countries
| Country | Slope/decade | Movements | |---|---:|---:| | PRT | -8.08 | 10 | | ISR | -7.93 | 16 | | CAN | -6.58 | 10 | | NZL | -5.66 | 10 | | BEL | -2.62 | 14 | | NOR | -1.48 | 9 | | FRA | -0.71 | 19 | | GBR | -0.43 | 21 | | AUS | +1.20 | 9 | | KOR | +1.95 | 11 | | JPN | +3.35 | 19 | | USA | +6.27 | 25 |
Steelman live concerns
See hypotheses/steelman/fiscal_rule_presence_dampens_statist_drift.md.
Particularly relevant: rule-presence is endogenous to fiscal preferences,
the binary lumps biting + non-biting rules together, and Sondervermögen-
style off-balance-sheet vehicles can circumvent rules without flipping the
treatment indicator.
Provenance
Reproduces from data/derived/country_drift.json + the FISCAL_RULE_BOUND
dictionary in this script. Edit the dictionary + re-run to test alternative
codings (every assignment carries a citation in the YAML).
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.