Pre-registration
Countries escaping middle income into high income are more likely to combine export openness with domestic market competition than export promotion with persistent domestic protection.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
The hypothesis is refuted if the interaction between export openness and low domestic protection (or high competition) is not positive and significant at p<0.10 in predicting high-income escape, or if export promotion combined with high domestic protection performs equally well.
formal test & threshold
test: panel_fe_interaction_openness_competition threshold: [object Object]
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 29 countries · 1950 – 2024
- Evidence type
- associational
Panel FE or conditional logit for escaping middle income, with interaction between export openness and domestic competition. Tests whether the combination outperforms export promotion with domestic protection.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
high_income_escape_dummy outcome | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | indicator_crossing_threshold |
real_gdp_per_capita_growth outcome | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZGtier 2 | level |
export_openness treatment | world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2 | level |
domestic_market_competition treatment | oecd_pmr:pmrtier 4 | level |
tariff_protection_avg treatment | wits:tariff_averagetier 2 | level |
log_initial_gdp_pc control | maddison:real_gdp_pctier 3 | log |
institutional_quality control | wgi:RL.ESTtier 4 | level |
human_capital control | owid:mean-years-of-schooling-long-run-1870tier 2 | level |
manufacturing_value_added_share control | world_bank_wdi:NV.IND.MANF.ZStier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — high_income_escape_market_openness_1950_2024
Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — insufficient observations after listwise deletion (4)
Pre-registration
- Claim: Countries escaping middle income into high income are more likely to combine export openness with domestic market competition than export promotion with persistent domestic protection.
- Falsification rule: The hypothesis is refuted if the interaction between export openness and low domestic protection (or high competition) is not positive and significant at p<0.10 in predicting high-income escape, or if export promotion combined with high domestic protection performs equally well.
- Falsification test: panel_fe_interaction_openness_competition
Estimate
- Error: insufficient observations after listwise deletion (4)
Variables resolved
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD→ high_income_escape_dummy (outcome, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=12104)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG→ real_gdp_per_capita_growth (outcome, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=13897)world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS→ export_openness (treatment, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=10714)oecd_pmr:pmr→ domestic_market_competition (treatment, publisher=oecd_pmr, n=14)world_bank_wits:tariff_average→ tariff_protection_avg (treatment, publisher=wits, n=3806)maddison:real_gdp_pc→ log_initial_gdp_pc (controls, publisher=maddison, n=19706)wgi:RL.EST→ institutional_quality (controls, publisher=wgi, n=5296)world_bank_wdi:NV.IND.MANF.ZS→ manufacturing_value_added_share (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=9698)
Variables missing data
owid:mean-years-of-schooling-long-run-1870(controls, name=human_capital) — vintage not on disk
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:52:50+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
WITS tariff data has gaps for many countries before 1990; interpolation and UN Comtrade alternative used. OECD PMR coverage limited before 1998 for emerging economies.