IESET.
Hypotheses·labour·jolts_openings_wage_pressure_us_2007_2026

Elevated US JOLTS job openings are a leading indicator of broad private-sector wage growth; when job openings accelerate, average hourly earnings growth follows within six months.

REFUTEDengine/runs/jolts_openings_wage_pressure_us_2007_2026

refuted

confidence cueThis test cuts against the claim as written or misses its pre-declared threshold.

policy briefNeeds review

In ordinary language

In plain terms, this asks whether jolts job openings yoy is actually linked to better or worse private average hourly earnings yoy from 2007 to 2026.

plain answer

The data did not support the prediction. refuted

why it matters

Labor-market rules often help some workers while risking job loss or slower hiring for others. This test looks for that tradeoff in observable employment or unemployment data.

how the test works

It compares 1 country or place units from 2007 to 2026, using a descriptive design.

what was measured
What changed
  • Jolts job openings yoy
What we checked
  • Private average hourly earnings yoy
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/jolts_openings_wage_pressure_us_2007_2026
1007550250200720172026USA
illustrative sketch · run pending
No coefficients yet. When the model fires, this chart will show private_average_hourly_earnings_yoy across 1 sampled countries over 20072026.
The shapes above are stylised — none of the lines are real data.
Placeholder for jolts_openings_wage_pressure_us_2007_2026. Published chart will be generated from engine/runs/jolts_openings_wage_pressure_us_2007_2026/chart_data.json.

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

1 school list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

pre-registered
first-spec commit 4c8ce8e · 2026-07-18T22:11:21Z

Elevated US JOLTS job openings are a leading indicator of broad private-sector wage growth; when job openings accelerate, average hourly earnings growth follows within six months.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

SUPPORTED if monthly YoY log growth in JOLTS job openings predicts private average hourly earnings YoY six months later with Pearson r >= 0.45, and months in the top quartile of openings growth show median six-month-ahead wage-growth acceleration of at least +0.25 percentage points. REFUTED if r <= 0.15 or median acceleration <= 0. PARTIAL otherwise. Exclude March 2020 through December 2021 from the primary correlation because pandemic labour-market measurement and reopening distort the signal.

formal test & threshold
test:      fred_jolts_openings_lead_private_ahe_yoy_6m
threshold: SUPPORTED: lead correlation >= 0.45 and top-quartile median wage-growth acceleration >= +0.25pp; REFUTED: correlation <= 0.15 or acceleration <= 0.

Method

Template
descriptive
Clustering
none
Sample
1 countries · 20072026
Evidence type
associational

Monthly lead-lag event-window diagnostic; openings YoY at t is compared with wage YoY at t+6, and wage acceleration is wage_yoy(t+6) minus wage_yoy(t).

Data

VariableSourceTransform
private_average_hourly_earnings_yoy
outcome
fred:CES0500000003tier 1
100 * log difference from 12 months earlier
jolts_job_openings_yoy
treatment
fred:JTSJOLtier 1
100 * log difference from 12 months earlier

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

Result card - jolts_openings_wage_pressure_us_2007_2026

Verdict: refuted - lead r=-0.219; top-quartile median 6m wage acceleration=0.07pp; n=200

Predeclared Test

Support requires openings YoY to correlate at least 0.45 with private AHE YoY six months later, and top-quartile openings-growth months to show at least +0.25pp median wage-growth acceleration six months later.

Primary sample excludes 2020-03 through 2021-12. Vintages: data/vintages/fred/JTSJOL@2026-04-30T114542Z.parquet, data/vintages/fred/CES0500000003@2026-04-30T114914Z.parquet.

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Notes

FRED-runnable labour-market tightness test using JOLTS job openings rather than quits because the on-disk BLS quits vintage is too short for a serious event-window test.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.