Pre-registration
New Zealand's 1991 Employment Contracts Act (abolition of national awards, individual contracts default, voluntary unionism) lowered the New Zealand unemployment rate by at least 2 pp by 1996 relative to a synthetic control of Anglo peer economies, with the largest gains in low-skill employment, but did not raise productivity growth above donor-pool baseline.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if synth-DiD gap on NZ unemployment rate < -2.0 pp by 1996 AND productivity-growth gap is not statistically distinguishable from zero. REFUTED if unemployment gap is wrong-signed at p<0.10. PARTIAL if unemployment gap meets threshold and productivity gap is also significantly positive (productivity-bonus interpretation).
formal test & threshold
test: Synth-DiD on NZ unemployment rate 1991-1996 vs Anglo donor pool, placebo permutation at p<0.10.
Method
- Template
synth_did- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 6 countries · 1985 – 2000
- Evidence type
- associational
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
unemployment_rate outcome | world_bank_wdi:SL.UEM.TOTL.ZStier 2 | level |
employment_to_population_ratio outcome | world_bank_wdi:SL.EMP.TOTL.SP.ZStier 2 | level |
labour_productivity_per_hour outcome | pwt:rgdpotier 3 | log |
eca_enactment_1991 treatment | constructed:indicator for 1991-Q2 ECA enactmenttier 5 | indicator |
gdp_per_capita_real control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | log |
trade_openness control | world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2 | level |
terms_of_trade_index control | world_bank_wdi:TT.PRI.MRCH.XD.WDtier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — labour_reform_nz_employment_contracts_act_1991
Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — insufficient pre-period coverage (years=0, donors=0)
Pre-registration
- Claim: New Zealand's 1991 Employment Contracts Act (abolition of national awards, individual contracts default, voluntary unionism) lowered the New Zealand unemployment rate by at least 2 pp by 1996 relative to a synthetic control of Anglo peer economies, with the largest gains in low-skill employment, but did not raise productivity growth above donor-pool baseline.
- Falsification rule: SUPPORTED if synth-DiD gap on NZ unemployment rate < -2.0 pp by 1996 AND productivity-growth gap is not statistically distinguishable from zero. REFUTED if unemployment gap is wrong-signed at p<0.10. PARTIAL if unemployment gap meets threshold and productivity gap is also significantly positive (productivity-bonus interpretation).
Synthetic-control estimate
- Error: insufficient pre-period coverage (years=0, donors=0)
Variables resolved
world_bank_wdi:SL.UEM.TOTL.ZS→ unemployment_rate (outcome, n=8071)world_bank_wdi:SL.EMP.TOTL.SP.ZS→ employment_to_population_ratio (outcome, n=8071)pwt:rgdpo→ labour_productivity_per_hour (outcome, n=10399)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD→ gdp_per_capita_real (controls, n=14066)world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS→ trade_openness (controls, n=10714)world_bank_wdi:TT.PRI.MRCH.XD.WD→ terms_of_trade_index (controls, n=6478)
Generated by scripts/run_synth_did.py at 2026-05-04T12:34:31+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
Treatment dated 1991-Q2 (ECA enactment). NZ is the canonical "deepest deregulation" case in the Anglo set and has been studied extensively. Donor pool is AUS, GBR, IRL, USA, CAN. The productivity-channel test is the steelman discipline: if NZ deregulation produced employment growth without productivity, the welfare verdict is mixed.