IESET.
Hypotheses·monetary·m2_expansion_correlates_with_asset_price_inflation

Monetary base expansion (M2 growth) correlates with asset price inflation in equities and real estate with a lag, measurable via cointegration and lead-lag analysis across major developed economies 2008-2025.

The relationship is asymmetric across asset classes and does not require a strict Austrian Business Cycle mechanism to hold.

PARTIALengine/runs/m2_expansion_correlates_with_asset_price_inflation

partial — Housing leg met the >=6/10 + positive-mean thresholds but equities did not. Equities: 5/9 non-negative, mean lag-1 corr = +0.198. Housing: 6/10 non-negative, mean = +0.108. Spec's asymmetry clause is consistent with this outcome but the symmetric-claim formulation is not fully supported.

confidence cueThe result is useful, but not decisive. Treat it as a clue, not a settled conclusion.

policy briefMixed or noisy

In ordinary language

In plain terms, this asks whether m2 growth annualised is actually linked to better or worse equity index real returns from 2008 to 2025.

plain answer

The evidence is suggestive but not decisive. Housing leg met the >=6/10 + positive-mean thresholds but equities did not.

why it matters

This matters because monetary claims should change belief only when they survive a pre-declared empirical test.

how the test works

It compares 10 country or place units from 2008 to 2025, using a cointegration vecm design, with fixed effects for country.

what was measured
What changed
  • M2 growth annualised
What we checked
  • Equity index real returns
  • Real estate price index real
  • Cpi core
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/m2_expansion_correlates_with_asset_price_inflation
1007550250200820172025USAGBRJPNAUSCANDEUFRA
illustrative sketch · run pending
No coefficients yet. When the model fires, this chart will show equity_index_real_returns across 10 sampled countries over 20082025.
The shapes above are stylised — none of the lines are real data.
Placeholder for m2_expansion_correlates_with_asset_price_inflation. Published chart will be generated from engine/runs/m2_expansion_correlates_with_asset_price_inflation/chart_data.json.

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

4 schools list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

pre-registered
first-spec commit 4c8ce8e · 2026-07-18T22:11:21Z

Monetary base expansion (M2 growth) correlates with asset price inflation in equities and real estate with a lag, measurable via cointegration and lead-lag analysis across major developed economies 2008-2025. The relationship is asymmetric across asset classes and does not require a strict Austrian Business Cycle mechanism to hold.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

PRIMARY (dispositive): the hypothesis is SUPPORTED if BOTH asset classes (real equity total return AND real housing total return) show (a) at least 6 of 10 spec countries with a non-negative Pearson correlation between M2-growth(t-1) and real-asset-return(t), AND (b) a panel mean lag-1 correlation > 0. PARTIAL if exactly one asset class clears (consistent with the spec's "asymmetric across asset classes" clause but not the symmetric reading). REFUTED if both asset classes fail both legs. INFORMATIVE: contemporaneous correlations and the sign distribution across countries are reported in diagnostics for transparency. METHOD_VALID: JST Macrohistory must contain money + asset-return series for at least 8 of 10 spec countries with >=5 annual observations each in 2008-2020.

formal test & threshold
test:      panel_lag1_correlation_dual_asset_class
threshold: PRIMARY: For each asset class, n_countries_with_nonneg_lag1_corr >= 6 AND panel_mean_lag1_corr > 0. SUPPORTED iff both asset classes pass; PARTIAL iff exactly one passes; REFUTED iff neither passes.

Method

Template
cointegration_vecm
Fixed effects
country
Clustering
country
Sample
10 countries · 20082025
Evidence type
associational

Johansen test for cointegration rank; VECM with country fixed effects; lead-lag analysis via cross-correlation functions reported alongside. Robustness: panel-ARDL as secondary specification.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
equity_index_real_returns
outcome
oecd:KEItier 2
real_yoy_pct_change_base_2015
real_estate_price_index_real
outcome
bis:WS_SPPtier 2
real_yoy_pct_change_base_2015
cpi_core
outcome
oecd:OECD.SDD.TPStier 2
yoy_pct_change
m2_growth_annualised
treatment
fred:M2SL (USA)tier 1
ecb:BSI (EU)tier 1
boe:LPMAUYM (GBR)tier 1
boj:MA (JPN)tier 1
rba:D3 (AUS)tier 1
statcan:v41552796 (CAN)tier 1
yoy_pct_change

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

M2 expansion correlates with asset price inflation

Verdict: partial — Housing leg met the >=6/10 + positive-mean thresholds but equities did not. Equities: 5/9 non-negative, mean lag-1 corr = +0.198. Housing: 6/10 non-negative, mean = +0.108. Spec's asymmetry clause is consistent with this outcome but the symmetric-claim formulation is not fully supported.

Summary

  • 10-country developed-economy annual panel, JST Macrohistory vintage (effective period 2008-2020; spec asks 2008-2025; tail not yet covered).
  • Equity leg: 5 of 9 countries with non-negative M2-growth(t-1) → real-equity-return(t) correlation. Panel mean lag-1 correlation: +0.198.
  • Housing leg: 6 of 10 countries with non-negative M2-growth(t-1) → real-housing-return(t) correlation. Panel mean lag-1 correlation: +0.108.
  • Falsification threshold: ≥6/10 countries with non-negative lag-1 correlation AND positive panel mean, in at least one asset class.

Method

Annual data from the Jorda-Schularick-Taylor Macrohistory database (jst:money export, which carries the full wide JST_R6 row). For each of the 10 spec countries:

  1. M2 growth = first-difference of log(money).
  2. Real equity total return = (eq_tr) / (1 + CPI YoY) − 1, where eq_tr is the JST gross-return index ratio.
  3. Real housing total return = (housing_tr) / (1 + CPI YoY) − 1; for Canada, where JST has no housing_tr, fallback to real YoY of hpnom.
  4. Lag-1 correlation = Pearson(M2_growth(t-1), real_return(t)) over the 2008-2020 country sub-sample (≥5 obs required).

Falsification rule (sharpened from spec): the symmetric-claim formulation requires both asset classes to clear; the asymmetric clause ("asymmetric across asset classes") is honoured by reporting a partial verdict when only one class clears.

Data

  • jst:money (Jorda-Schularick-Taylor Macrohistory wide panel, containing money / eq_tr / housing_tr / hpnom / cpi columns)

Caveats

  • JST annual frequency loses the quarterly lead-lag structure the spec's VECM design contemplated. The cointegration_vecm template is downgraded here to a panel-correlation primary because (a) annual frequency over 13 years yields too few observations for stable Johansen ranks per country, and (b) the spec's threshold is operationalisable as a country-share-of-positive-lag-correlations test without estimating a full VECM. A v2 promotion using quarterly BIS WS_SPP property prices + national M3 series could restore the VECM design.
  • Sample period 2008-2020 only; 2021-2025 (post-COVID QE peak and subsequent QT) not covered by the JST vintage on disk. The QE-peak years are exactly the test most favourable to the claim, so the absent tail makes the test slightly conservative.

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Notes

Scope decision per mega-spec D.1.5: this hypothesis does NOT extend to claiming ABCT orthodoxy holds, nor that QE necessarily produces CPI inflation. The empirical claim is scoped to asset-price correlation with M2 growth across major developed economies post-2008.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.