IESET.
Hypotheses·labour·meidner_wage_earner_fund_capital_flight

Swedish Meidner plan / wage-earner funds 1984-1991 did not produce measurable capital flight during their brief implementation, falsifying claims that citizen ownership funds trigger disinvestment.

SUPPORTEDengine/runs/meidner_wage_earner_fund_capital_flight

SUPPORTED — none of the three registered macro capital-flight proxies breached the Sweden 1984-1991 Meidner-fund thresholds.

confidence cueThis is a clear pass for the claim as written. It still applies only to this sample, period, and method.

policy briefNeeds review

In ordinary language

In plain terms, this asks whether meidner fund enactment is actually linked to better or worse portfolio capital outflows sweden from 1980 to 1995.

plain answer

The data clearly moved in the predicted direction. none of the three registered macro capital-flight proxies breached the Sweden 1984-1991 Meidner-fund thresholds.

why it matters

Labor-market rules often help some workers while risking job loss or slower hiring for others. This test looks for that tradeoff in observable employment or unemployment data.

how the test works

It compares 1 country or place units from 1980 to 1995, using a event study design, with fixed effects for date.

what was measured
What changed
  • Meidner fund enactment
What we checked
  • Portfolio capital outflows sweden
  • Gross fixed capital formation
  • Corporate investment share
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/meidner_wage_earner_fund_capital_flight
1007550250198019881995SWE
illustrative sketch · run pending
No coefficients yet. When the model fires, this chart will show portfolio_capital_outflows_sweden across 1 sampled countries over 19801995.
The shapes above are stylised — none of the lines are real data.
Placeholder for meidner_wage_earner_fund_capital_flight. Published chart will be generated from engine/runs/meidner_wage_earner_fund_capital_flight/chart_data.json.

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

1 school list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

pre-registered
first-spec commit bae09ab · 2026-04-29T22:09:42Z
run generated · 2026-05-03T10:43:54Z

Swedish Meidner plan / wage-earner funds 1984-1991 did not produce measurable capital flight during their brief implementation, falsifying claims that citizen ownership funds trigger disinvestment.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

Primary event-window proxy compares Sweden's 1984-1991 wage-earner-fund period with the 1980-1983 pre-period using WDI gross fixed capital formation (% GDP), FDI net inflows (% GDP), and the SEK/USD official exchange rate. The null/no-large-capital-flight claim is supported if investment does not fall by more than 2pp of GDP, FDI inflows do not fall by more than 1pp of GDP, and the SEK/USD average does not depreciate by more than 25% relative to pre-period. It is refuted if at least two of those three capital-flight proxies breach their thresholds. Otherwise it is weakened.

formal test & threshold
test:      sweden_meidner_macro_capital_flight_proxy_1984_1991
threshold: support if fewer than one proxy breaches; refute if at least two proxies breach

Method

Template
event_study
Fixed effects
date
Clustering
date
Sample
1 countries · 19801995
Evidence type
associational

Event study around the 1984 Meidner-fund enactment in Sweden, with capital flows (BoP), corporate investment, and SEK as outcomes. Tight pre/post window 1980-1991 (until 1991 fund abolition). Caveat noted: small fund scale limits power.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
portfolio_capital_outflows_sweden
outcome
imf:BFOAFAtier 2
log
gross_fixed_capital_formation
outcome
world_bank_wdi:NE.GDI.FTOT.ZStier 2
level
corporate_investment_share
outcome
world_bank_wdi:NE.GDI.FPRV.ZStier 2
level
sek_usd_exchange_rate
outcome
world_bank_wdi:PA.NUS.FCRFtier 2
log_yoy
sek_real_effective_exchange_rate
outcome
bis:WS_EERtier 2
log
meidner_fund_enactment
treatment
derived:meidner_fund_datestier 4
indicator
oecd_fdi_inflows_average
control
world_bank_wdi:BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZStier 2
level
real_gdp_per_capita_growth
control
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD.ZGtier 2
level
real_interest_rate_sweden
control
world_bank_wdi:FR.INR.RINRtier 2
level

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

meidner_wage_earner_fund_capital_flight

Verdict: SUPPORTED — none of the three registered macro capital-flight proxies breached the Sweden 1984-1991 Meidner-fund thresholds.

Registered Metrics

  • investment_pct_gdp: pre 24.246, event 26.329, change +2.083, breach=False.
  • fdi_inflows_pct_gdp: pre 0.211, event 0.800, change +0.589, breach=False.
  • sek_usd_exchange_rate: pre 5.811, event 6.860, change +0.181, breach=False.

Method Note

The 1992 Swedish currency crisis is outside the primary event window; this is a macro-proxy test, not household-level offshore wealth measurement.

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Notes

Stub seeded from a market-socialist school prediction about Meidner-fund capital-flight null. v2 pins a limited macro-proxy event test using local WDI data. The fund was small-scale and short-lived, so support remains evidence against a large immediate capital-flight shock, not proof that larger citizen-ownership funds are harmless.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.