Pre-registration
Minimum-wage increases above the local median-wage ratio produce disemployment effects at the low-skill margin, even if aggregate employment effects are small.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
The hypothesis is considered falsified if the pre-registered empirical test shows the opposite direction of the claim at conventional significance (p > 0.10), or if the primary outcome measure moves less than 10% in the claimed direction across the sample. Exact thresholds will be pinned in the variables and estimator blocks when this stub is promoted from draft.
formal test & threshold
test: Stratified Callaway-Sant'Anna DiD on US state min-wage cohorts by bite-ratio terciles 1971-2023; supported if high-bite (>0.6) cohorts show low-skill disemployment >2pp larger than low-bite at p<0.10.
Method
- Template
did_callaway_santanna- Fixed effects
state, year- Clustering
state- Sample
- 15 countries · 1990 – 2022
- Evidence type
- associational
Staggered DiD across US state minimum-wage increases stratified by bite ratio (minimum/median wage). Tests whether high-bite cohorts show measurable low-skill (teen, low-education) disemployment relative to low-bite cohorts.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
teen_employment_to_population outcome | fred:LNS12300012tier 1 | level |
low_education_unemployment_rate outcome | oecd:OECD.ELS.EMPtier 2 | level |
low_skill_employment_share outcome | oecd:OECD.ELS.EMPtier 2 | share |
minimum_to_median_wage_ratio treatment | oecd:OECD.ELS.SAEtier 2 | ratio |
state_minimum_wage treatment | fred:STTMINWGCAtier 1 | log |
minimum_wage_real_level treatment | oecd:OECD.ELS.SAEtier 2 | log |
unemployment_rate control | world_bank_wdi:SL.UEM.TOTL.ZStier 2 | level |
gdp_per_capita_real control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | log |
epl_overall_index control | oecd:OECD.ELS.EMPtier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Minimum-wage disemployment at high bite ratios, 1990-2022
Verdict: inconclusive — data gap on bls:LAU_state_teen_employment_population_ratio_panel, bls:OES_state_median_hourly_wage_panel. The spec's primary stratified Callaway-Sant'Anna DiD on US-state cohorts split by bite ratio (state-min / state-median-hourly-wage) cannot be estimated without (a) the BLS LAU state teen employment-population panel, (b) the USDOL state minimum-wage history, and (c) the BLS OES state median-hourly-wage panel. On-disk BLS vintages currently include only national LNS/CES/CUUR series; the state fan-out has not been fetched. OECD contextual panels are present but cannot replace the preregistered US state cohort design. No coefficients computed.
Summary
- Tests the Chicago-monetarist claim that high bite-ratio (state-min / state-median-hourly-wage ≥ 0.55) cohorts show measurable extra teen disemployment vs low bite-ratio (< 0.45) cohorts in the 1990-2022 US-state panel.
- Primary statistic: ATT(high-bite) − ATT(low-bite) on teen E/P, percentage points. SUPPORTED iff ≤ −0.020 pp at p<0.10.
- Informative: Dube-Lester-Reich border-county elasticity on QCEW NAICS-722 (food services); cross-country OECD bite-ratio panel regression for the 15 spec countries.
- Required series: 1 outcome, 2 treatment (state min-wage history + state median hourly wage), 1 border-pair, 2 OECD = 6 total.
- Found on-disk: 4 of 6.
- Missing primary outcome: ['bls:LAU_state_teen_employment_population_ratio_panel'].
- Missing treatment: ['bls:OES_state_median_hourly_wage_panel'].
- Missing border-pair: (none).
- Missing OECD cross-country: (none).
- Hold marker: HOLD until sibling-panel signs reconcile with the preregistered high-bite disemployment direction.
Method
Pre-registered specification (50-state panel, 1990-2022, excluding 2020-2021 COVID labour-market shock):
Step 1: bite_ratio_{s,t} = state_min_wage_{s,t} /
state_median_hourly_wage_{s,t}
Step 2: assign each (state, treatment-cohort) to
HIGH-BITE if max(bite_ratio) >= 0.55
LOW-BITE if max(bite_ratio) < 0.45
Step 3: Callaway-Sant'Anna 2021 staggered DiD on teen E/P,
state and year FE, never- and late-treated controls,
state-clustered SE.
Step 4: Differential = ATT_high - ATT_low (percentage points).
Falsification thresholds (dispositive): PRIMARY: differential ≤ -0.020 pp at p<0.10 → SUPPORTED. REFUTED if differential ≥ 0 at p<0.10 (Chicago direction wrong). REFUTED if |differential| < +0.005 pp with sufficient power (effect too small to support the claim).
Informative (not gating): Border-county DLR elasticity on QCEW NAICS-722 employment for state-pairs whose bite ratios diverge by ≥ 0.10. OECD MWUSD bite-ratio panel: low-skill unemployment rate ~ bite-ratio + country FE + year FE on the 15-country spec sample.
Data
Required (per spec):
bls:LAU_state_teen_employment_population_ratio_panel— missingusdol:state_minimum_wage_history— availablebls:OES_state_median_hourly_wage_panel— missingbls:QCEW_county_NAICS722_employment_panel— availableoecd:MWUSD— availableoecd:DSD_LMS_low_education_unemployment_rate— available
Promotion verdict: inconclusive (method-validity gate fails on data availability — the primary state-level BLS outcome and median-wage bite-ratio inputs are not on disk; OECD contextual panels are present but cannot replace the preregistered US state cohort design). Per HANDOFF_TO_RUN_AGENT.md a data gap is NOT a refutation — the scoreboard treats this as neutral. Re-run when (a) the BLS state fan-out lands (LAU state teen E/P panel, OES state median hourly wage), and (b) sibling-panel signs reconcile with the preregistered high-bite disemployment direction.
Notes
Stub seeded from a Chicago-monetarist school prediction about minimum-wage bite-ratio disemployment. Cross-country bite-ratio measurement is harmonised through OECD; needs human review on demographic-margin definition.