IESET.
Hypotheses·labour·mortgage_rate_shock_housing_starts_us_1971_2026

Large US mortgage-rate increases are followed by materially weaker housing starts within one year, consistent with interest-rate-sensitive residential construction labour demand.

REFUTEDengine/runs/mortgage_rate_shock_housing_starts_us_1971_2026

refuted

confidence cueThis test cuts against the claim as written or misses its pre-declared threshold.

policy briefNeeds review

In ordinary language

In plain terms, this asks whether thirty year mortgage rate is actually linked to better or worse housing starts from 1971 to 2026.

plain answer

The data did not support the prediction. refuted

why it matters

Labor-market rules often help some workers while risking job loss or slower hiring for others. This test looks for that tradeoff in observable employment or unemployment data.

how the test works

It compares 1 country or place units from 1971 to 2026, using a event study design.

what was measured
What changed
  • Thirty year mortgage rate
What we checked
  • Housing starts
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/mortgage_rate_shock_housing_starts_us_1971_2026
1007550250197119992026USA
illustrative sketch · run pending
No coefficients yet. When the model fires, this chart will show housing_starts across 1 sampled countries over 19712026.
The shapes above are stylised — none of the lines are real data.
Placeholder for mortgage_rate_shock_housing_starts_us_1971_2026. Published chart will be generated from engine/runs/mortgage_rate_shock_housing_starts_us_1971_2026/chart_data.json.

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

1 school list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

pre-registered
first-spec commit 4c8ce8e · 2026-07-18T22:11:21Z

Large US mortgage-rate increases are followed by materially weaker housing starts within one year, consistent with interest-rate-sensitive residential construction labour demand.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

Identify non-overlapping monthly episodes where the 30-year fixed mortgage rate rises at least +150bp over the previous 12 months. For each completed episode, compare housing starts 12 months later with the episode month. SUPPORTED if at least 60% of completed episodes have starts down at least 15% and the median 12-month starts change is <= -15%. REFUTED if fewer than 40% pass or the median starts change is positive. PARTIAL otherwise.

formal test & threshold
test:      fred_mortgage_rate_shock_housing_starts_12m
threshold: SUPPORTED: pass rate >= 60% and median 12m starts change <= -15%; REFUTED: pass rate < 40% or median starts change > 0%.

Method

Template
event_study
Clustering
none
Sample
1 countries · 19712026
Evidence type
associational

Non-overlapping shock windows with 12-month forward change in seasonally adjusted annualized housing starts.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
housing_starts
outcome
fred:HOUSTtier 1
12-month log change after shock
thirty_year_mortgage_rate
treatment
fred:MORTGAGE30UStier 1
monthly average; 12-month change in basis points

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

Result card - mortgage_rate_shock_housing_starts_us_1971_2026

Verdict: refuted - 3/8 episodes pass; median 12m starts change -8.4%

Episode Table

| Month | 12m mortgage-rate change bp | 12m housing-starts change | Pass | |---|---:|---:|:---:| | 1979-09-01 | 154 | -21.9% | yes | | 1980-09-01 | 190 | -47.9% | yes | | 1981-09-01 | 496 | 22.8% | no | | 1984-06-01 | 155 | -9.5% | no | | 1994-09-01 | 173 | -7.4% | no | | 2000-02-01 | 152 | -6.7% | no | | 2022-04-01 | 192 | -29.6% | yes | | 2023-08-01 | 185 | 5.5% | no |

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Notes

Placed under labour because the mechanism is residential construction activity and labour demand; the treatment is monetary/credit-market transmission through mortgage rates.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.