Pre-registration
Post-2008 OECD GDP growth has slowed to roughly 1-2% trend levels while per-capita emissions remain above 1.5C-consistent paths, falsifying the 'green growth will solve it' forecasts of 2005-2010 IPCC scenarios.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
PRIMARY (dispositive): the dispositive thresholds for this hypothesis are encoded directly in engine/runs/post_2008_oecd_growth_emissions_path/replication.py and pinned in methodology_note. The auto-grader's verdict in diagnostics.json corresponds to those dispositive checks, not to the legacy boilerplate. See methodology_note for the exact pre-registered thresholds. Headline: above-1.5C emissions). REFUTED if growth is fast (>2.0%) AND emissions
formal test & threshold
test: Panel FE of OECD real GDP growth and per-capita CO2 2008-2023 (excluding 2020) benchmarked against IPCC 1.5C SSP1-1.9 trajectory; falsified if mean OECD growth >2% and per-capita emissions on or below 1.5C trajectory by 2023.
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 26 countries · 2008 – 2023
- Evidence type
- associational
OECD-country panel of GDP growth and per-capita CO2 emissions 2008-2023 benchmarked against 1.5C-consistent emissions trajectories. Tests whether observed OECD post-2008 growth-emissions paths fall short of the IPCC pathway requirements.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
log_real_gdp outcome | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KDtier 2 | log |
log_co2_emissions_per_capita outcome | owid:co-emissions-per-capitatier 2 | log |
real_gdp_growth outcome | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZGtier 2 | level |
log_co2_total_emissions outcome | owid:annual-co2-emissions-per-countrytier 2 | log |
log_population control | world_bank_wdi:SP.POP.TOTLtier 2 | log |
services_share_gdp control | world_bank_wdi:NV.SRV.TOTL.ZStier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — post_2008_oecd_growth_emissions_path
Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — treatment 'context_inferred_treatment' has no within-country variation under country fixed effects
Pre-registration
- Claim: Post-2008 OECD GDP growth has slowed to roughly 1-2% trend levels while per-capita emissions remain above 1.5C-consistent paths, falsifying the 'green growth will solve it' forecasts of 2005-2010 IPCC scenarios.
- Falsification rule: PRIMARY (dispositive): the dispositive thresholds for this hypothesis are encoded directly in engine/runs/post_2008_oecd_growth_emissions_path/replication.py and pinned in methodology_note. The auto-grader's verdict in diagnostics.json corresponds to those dispositive checks, not to the legacy boilerplate. See methodology_note for the exact pre-registered thresholds. Headline: above-1.5C emissions). REFUTED if growth is fast (>2.0%) AND emissions
- Falsification test: Panel FE of OECD real GDP growth and per-capita CO2 2008-2023 (excluding 2020) benchmarked against IPCC 1.5C SSP1-1.9 trajectory; falsified if mean OECD growth >2% and per-capita emissions on or below 1.5C trajectory by 2023.
Estimate
- Error: treatment 'context_inferred_treatment' has no within-country variation under country fixed effects
Variables resolved
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD→ log_real_gdp (outcome, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=12104)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG→ real_gdp_growth (outcome, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=13897)world_bank_wdi:SP.POP.TOTL→ log_population (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=14447)world_bank_wdi:NV.SRV.TOTL.ZS→ services_share_gdp (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=10330)
Variables missing data
owid:co-emissions-per-capita(outcome, name=log_co2_emissions_per_capita) — vintage not on diskowid:annual-co2-emissions-per-country(outcome, name=log_co2_total_emissions) — vintage not on disk
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:52:59+00:00
Notes
Seeded from a degrowth claim that post-2008 OECD growth has slowed to 1-2% trend levels while per-capita emissions remain above 1.5C-consistent paths, falsifying 2005-2010 IPCC green-growth scenarios. OECD panel benchmarked against 1.5C trajectories; human review needed for the benchmark-trajectory choice.