Pre-registration
Public R&D spending (government and higher-education R&D) complements private-market innovation at the technology frontier, raising private patenting, total factor productivity, and venture-capital activity in sectors with high spillover potential (defence, health, general-purpose technologies). The complementarity is stronger in high-income countries 1990-2020 where private R&D is already substantial, and weaker or absent in catch-up economies where imitation dominates invention.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
The hypothesis is falsified if public R&D has a negative and significant (p < 0.10) coefficient on private innovation outcomes, or if the public-private interaction term is negative and significant in a frontier-country panel.
formal test & threshold
test: panel_fe_public_rd_private_innovation_complement_1990_2020 threshold: [object Object]
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 25 countries · 1990 – 2020
- Evidence type
- associational
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
private_patents_per_capita outcome | wipo:patent_applications_residentstier 2 | log |
tfp_growth outcome | pwt:rtfpnatier 3 | log_diff_5y |
venture_capital_gdp outcome | constructed:PitchBook; oecd: venture_capital_investmentstier 5 | log |
public_rd_gdp treatment | world_bank_wdi:GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZStier 2 | level |
private_rd_gdp treatment | oecd: main_science_technology_indicators; world_bank_wdi | level |
log_gdp_per_capita control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | log |
human_capital_index control | pwt:hctier 3 | level |
trade_openness control | world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2 | level |
ip_protection_index control | constructed:park_patent_rights_indextier 5 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — public_rd_frontier_innovation_complement
Verdict: PARTIAL — coef=+0.01228, p=0.15 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
Pre-registration
- Claim: Public R&D spending (government and higher-education R&D) complements private-market innovation at the technology frontier, raising private patenting, total factor productivity, and venture-capital activity in sectors with high spillover potential (defence, health, general-purpose technologies). The complementarity is stronger in high-income countries 1990-2020 where private R&D is already substantial, and weaker or absent in catch-up economies where imitation dominates invention.
- Falsification rule: The hypothesis is falsified if public R&D has a negative and significant (p < 0.10) coefficient on private innovation outcomes, or if the public-private interaction term is negative and significant in a frontier-country panel.
- Falsification test: panel_fe_public_rd_private_innovation_complement_1990_2020
Estimate
- Method: linearmodels.PanelOLS
- Coefficient (treatment): +0.01228
- Std error: 0.008519
- p-value: 0.15
- Observations: 464, countries: 20
- Within R²: 0.649
- Fixed effects: entity=True, time=True
- Clustering: country
Variables resolved
pwt:rtfpna→ tfp_growth (outcome, publisher=pwt, n=6407)world_bank_wdi:GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS→ public_rd_gdp (treatment, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=3140)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD→ log_gdp_per_capita (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=12104)pwt:hc→ human_capital_index (controls, publisher=pwt, n=8637)world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS→ trade_openness (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=10714)
Variables missing data
wipo:patent_applications_residents(outcome, name=private_patents_per_capita) — vintage not on diskconstructed: PitchBook; oecd: venture_capital_investments(outcome, name=venture_capital_gdp) — vintage not on diskoecd: main_science_technology_indicators; world_bank_wdi(treatment, name=private_rd_gdp) — vintage not on diskconstructed: park_patent_rights_index(controls, name=ip_protection_index) — vintage not on disk
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:53:00+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.