Pre-registration
Stricter rent-price controls predict slower residential building-permit growth in European country panels. The market mechanism is that binding rent ceilings reduce expected returns to new rental housing and maintenance; the redistribution counterclaim is that rent controls can transfer surplus to tenants without reducing future supply.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if rent_control_intensity is negative for residential building-permit growth at p<=0.10 with at least 150 observations and 15 countries. REFUTED if rent_control_intensity is positive at p<=0.10 under the same sample floor. Otherwise PARTIAL or INCONCLUSIVE depending on data coverage.
formal test & threshold
test: panel_fe_rent_price_controls_building_permits_eu_panel threshold: [object Object]
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 28 countries · 2000 – 2024
- Evidence type
- associational
Two-way fixed effects with country-clustered errors. The overburden-rate outcome is reported separately because rent controls can lower measured incumbent rents while reducing supply for future tenants.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
residential_building_permits_index_growth outcome | eurostat:bldg_pi_lttier 1 | annual_log_change |
housing_cost_overburden_rate outcome | eurostat:ilc_lvho07atier 1 | level |
rent_control_intensity treatment | constructed:european_rent_control_indextier 5 | level |
log_gdp_pc control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | log |
population_growth control | world_bank_wdi:SP.POP.GROWtier 2 | level |
real_interest_rate control | world_bank_wdi:FR.INR.RINRtier 2 | level |
rule_of_law control | wgi:RL.ESTtier 4 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — rent_price_controls_building_permits_eu_panel
Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — treatment 'rent_control_intensity' has no within-country variation under country fixed effects
Pre-registration
- Claim: Stricter rent-price controls predict slower residential building-permit growth in European country panels. The market mechanism is that binding rent ceilings reduce expected returns to new rental housing and maintenance; the redistribution counterclaim is that rent controls can transfer surplus to tenants without reducing future supply.
- Falsification rule: SUPPORTED if rent_control_intensity is negative for residential building-permit growth at p<=0.10 with at least 150 observations and 15 countries. REFUTED if rent_control_intensity is positive at p<=0.10 under the same sample floor. Otherwise PARTIAL or INCONCLUSIVE depending on data coverage.
- Falsification test: panel_fe_rent_price_controls_building_permits_eu_panel
Estimate
- Error: treatment 'rent_control_intensity' has no within-country variation under country fixed effects
Variables resolved
eurostat:ilc_lvho07a→ housing_cost_overburden_rate (outcome, publisher=eurostat, n=828)constructed:european_rent_control_index→ rent_control_intensity (treatment, publisher=constructed, n=700)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD→ log_gdp_pc (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=12104)world_bank_wdi:SP.POP.GROW→ population_growth (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=16672)world_bank_wdi:FR.INR.RINR→ real_interest_rate (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=4694)wgi:RL.EST→ rule_of_law (controls, publisher=wgi, n=5296)
Variables missing data
eurostat:bldg_pi_lt(outcome, name=residential_building_permits_index_growth) — vintage not on disk
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:53:15+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
Eurostat and WDI are ready publishers. The main blocker for a runnable replication is transparent construction of the rent-control intensity index.