Pre-registration
Estonia's 1994 flat-tax 26 percent (subsequently reduced to 20 percent by 2015) and the unique 2000 corporate-tax reform (taxing only distributed corporate profits) produced a measurable rise in the Estonian top-1 pretax income share over 1994-2010 vs Baltic synthetic comparator (LVA, LTU), with the distributed-profit-only corporate regime channelling capital-income into top-decile reported income while reducing taxation of retained earnings. The discriminating test is the synth-control gap on top-1 share against LVA/LTU.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if Estonian top-1 pretax share is at least 1.0 percentage point above Baltic synth at the 2010 horizon AND dividend share of top-decile income exceeds Baltic comparator average by 3 percentage points at p<0.10. REFUTED if no detectable gap or negative gap at horizon.
formal test & threshold
test: Synthetic-control with Baltic donor pool (LVA, LTU), treated EST 1994. Composition robustness via dividend-share decomposition.
Method
- Template
synthetic_control- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 3 countries · 1994 – 2015
- Evidence type
- associational
Synthetic-control with Baltic donor pool. Treated EST 1994.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
top_1pct_pretax_income_share outcome | owid:top-1-share-of-total-incometier 2 | level |
est_flat_tax_post_1994 treatment | constructed:indicator = 1 for EST, year >= 1994tier 5 | indicator |
top_marginal_income_tax_rate treatment | owid:top-marginal-income-tax-ratetier 2 | level |
log_real_gdp_per_capita control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | log |
trade_openness control | world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — tax_inequality_estonia_1994_flat_tax_dividend_reform
Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — insufficient pre-period coverage (years=1, donors=0)
Pre-registration
- Claim: Estonia's 1994 flat-tax 26 percent (subsequently reduced to 20 percent by 2015) and the unique 2000 corporate-tax reform (taxing only distributed corporate profits) produced a measurable rise in the Estonian top-1 pretax income share over 1994-2010 vs Baltic synthetic comparator (LVA, LTU), with the distributed-profit-only corporate regime channelling capital-income into top-decile reported income while reducing taxation of retained earnings. The discriminating test is the synth-control gap on top-1 share against LVA/LTU.
- Falsification rule: SUPPORTED if Estonian top-1 pretax share is at least 1.0 percentage point above Baltic synth at the 2010 horizon AND dividend share of top-decile income exceeds Baltic comparator average by 3 percentage points at p<0.10. REFUTED if no detectable gap or negative gap at horizon.
Synthetic-control estimate
- Error: insufficient pre-period coverage (years=1, donors=0)
Variables resolved
owid:top-1-share-of-total-income→ top_1pct_pretax_income_share (outcome, n=3294)constructed: indicator = 1 for EST, year >= 1994→ est_flat_tax_post_1994 (treatment, n=66)owid:top-marginal-income-tax-rate→ top_marginal_income_tax_rate (treatment, n=590)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD→ log_real_gdp_per_capita (controls, n=14066)world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS→ trade_openness (controls, n=10714)
Generated by scripts/run_synth_did.py at 2026-05-04T12:34:34+00:00
Notes
Tax-inequality candidate, swarm-S6 batch 6. The Estonian distributed- profits-only corporate tax is unique and uniquely identifying for retention-vs-distribution incentive effects.