Pre-registration
The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act (signed 1930-06-17, raising US weighted average tariffs on dutiable imports from approximately 40% to approximately 47-50%) coincided with a collapse in global merchandise trade that exceeded the contemporaneous fall in global GDP. World trade fell roughly 65% in nominal terms 1929- 1933 vs roughly 50% nominal-GDP fall. The descriptive claim is long-history Maddison/PWT-grounded that the 1930-1933 period shows the largest peacetime trade-collapse in 20th-century history, with retaliatory tariff cascades documented in the trade-policy literature.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if trade-to-GDP for the major-economy panel mean fell from 1925-1929 mean to 1932-1933 mean by >=8 pp (a collapse exceeding any other peacetime episode in JST coverage). REFUTED if the fall was less than 5 pp.
formal test & threshold
test: descriptive_smoot_hawley_great_depression_trade_collapse threshold: PRIMARY: panel-mean trade-to-GDP fall(1925-29 -> 1932-33) >= 8 pp. METHOD_VALID: JST trade-to-GDP series available for >=8 of the panel countries 1925-1933.
Method
- Template
descriptive- Clustering
none- Sample
- 14 countries · 1925 – 1939
- Evidence type
- descriptive
Long-history descriptive analysis using JST and Maddison/PWT data. Reports trade-to-GDP collapse magnitude across major economies 1929-1933 vs 1925-1929 baseline. Identification at the international-tariff-cascade level is qualitative and historiographic; this spec records the magnitude pattern.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
real_gdp_pc_pwt outcome | pwt:rgdpetier 3 maddison:gdppc_ppptier 3 | log |
trade_to_gdp_jst outcome | jst:exports_to_gdptier 3 jst:imports_to_gdptier 3 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.