IESET.
Hypotheses·growth·uk_nationalised_industry_investment_rates

UK post-war nationalised industries (coal, rail, steel, gas) through 1979 achieved capital-investment rates comparable to sectoral peers in West Germany and France, falsifying the claim that public ownership categorically starves investment.

INCONCLUSIVEengine/runs/uk_nationalised_industry_investment_rates

INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — no outcome or no treatment variable in spec

confidence cueResult card produced; verdict unclassified.

policy briefCoverage too thin

In ordinary language

Over a long period, do more market-oriented institutions translate into higher income or productivity, once the comparison looks beyond a single success story?

plain answer

This test cannot make a firm call yet. no outcome or no treatment variable in spec

why it matters

Growth claims can look convincing in single success stories. This test asks whether the pattern survives a broader comparison.

how the test works

It compares 3 country or place units from 1950 to 1979, using a panel fe design, with fixed effects for country and year.

what was measured
What we checked
  • Capital investment rate
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/uk_nationalised_industry_investment_rates
Loading chart…

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

1 school list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

registration ordering unverified
first-spec commit 4c8ce8e · 2026-07-18T22:11:21Z
run generated · 2026-06-29T17:53:06Z
Run timestamp predates this path's first git-add commit (rebase, rename, or pre-git local run). Spec hash is still the path's first-add commit — not repository HEAD — but ordering is not a clean pre-registration proof.

UK post-war nationalised industries (coal, rail, steel, gas) through 1979 achieved capital-investment rates comparable to sectoral peers in West Germany and France, falsifying the claim that public ownership categorically starves investment.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

PRIMARY (dispositive): the hypothesis is SUPPORTED if the absolute gap |mean(UK csh_i, 1950-1979) - mean(DEU+FRA csh_i, 1950-1979)| is at most 5 percentage points of gross capital formation share of GDP. REFUTED if the UK undershoots the DEU+FRA peer mean by more than 10pp. Outcomes between -10pp and -5pp (UK below peers by 5-10pp) score as weakened (directionally consistent with crowd-out but not dispositive under the symmetric SUPPORTED band). Outcomes between +5pp and +10pp (UK above peers by 5-10pp) score as partial. METHOD_VALID: PWT csh_i has non-null annual coverage for all three countries (GBR, DEU, FRA) for at least 28 of the 30 years in 1950-1979. INFORMATIVE: per-country mean csh_i, year-by-year UK-vs-peer-mean gap series, reported in diagnostics.

formal test & threshold
test:      uk_vs_peer_country_csh_i_gap_1950_1979
threshold: PRIMARY: |mean(UK csh_i 1950-1979) - mean({DEU,FRA} csh_i 1950-1979)| <= 0.05 SUPPORTED. UK below peers by > 0.10 REFUTED.

Method

Template
panel_fe
Fixed effects
country, year
Clustering
country
Sample
3 countries · 19501979
Evidence type
associational

v2 country-level mean comparison. UK csh_i 1950-1979 vs peer (DEU+FRA) mean csh_i over the same window. Implementation in engine/runs/uk_nationalised_industry_investment_rates/replication.py computes the gap directly rather than running a regression — with only 3 countries and 30 years a panel FE adds noise without additional identification.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
capital_investment_rate
outcome
pwt:csh_itier 3

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

Result card — uk_nationalised_industry_investment_rates

Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — no outcome or no treatment variable in spec

Pre-registration

  • Claim: UK post-war nationalised industries (coal, rail, steel, gas) through 1979 achieved capital-investment rates comparable to sectoral peers in West Germany and France, falsifying the claim that public ownership categorically starves investment.
  • Falsification rule: PRIMARY (dispositive): the hypothesis is SUPPORTED if the absolute gap |mean(UK csh_i, 1950-1979) - mean(DEU+FRA csh_i, 1950-1979)| is at most 5 percentage points of gross capital formation share of GDP. REFUTED if the UK undershoots the DEU+FRA peer mean by more than 10pp. Outcomes between -10pp and -5pp (UK below peers by 5-10pp) score as weakened (directionally consistent with crowd-out but not dispositive under the symmetric SUPPORTED band). Outcomes between +5pp and +10pp (UK above peers by 5-10pp) score as partial. METHOD_VALID: PWT csh_i has non-null annual coverage for all three countries (GBR, DEU, FRA) for at least 28 of the 30 years in 1950-1979. INFORMATIVE: per-country mean csh_i, year-by-year UK-vs-peer-mean gap series, reported in diagnostics.
  • Falsification test: uk_vs_peer_country_csh_i_gap_1950_1979

Estimate

  • Error: no outcome or no treatment variable in spec

Variables resolved

  • pwt:csh_i → capital_investment_rate (outcome, publisher=pwt, n=10399)

Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:53:06+00:00

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Notes

v2 (2026-04-27) downgrades the original sector-level ambition (coal/rail/steel/gas) to a country-level test. No on-disk publisher provides comparable sectoral capital-formation series for GBR/DEU/FRA back to 1950. PWT csh_i (gross capital formation share of GDP at current PPPs) is the only series that covers the full 1950-1979 window for all three countries. The country-level test treats the UK's economy-wide investment share as a noisy proxy for the nationalised-sector investment share, on the rationale that the nationalised industries were a large enough share of UK gross fixed capital formation in this period to dominate the country-level signal if they were truly investment-starved. See methodology_note.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.