Pre-registration
Spain's Ingreso Mínimo Vital (IMV, June 2020 emergency-launched during COVID) reached fewer than half of intended-eligible households within 24 months due to take-up frictions, producing a measured reduction in extreme-poverty headcount of less than 3 percentage points by 2022 — well below the pre-launch government estimate of 7-10pp — and providing a natural test of unconditional-floor design in a high-frictions administrative environment.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
Refuted if IMV take-up (recipients / eligible households) exceeds 60% by end-2022, OR if the extreme-poverty-rate gap with donor pool exceeds minus-3pp at 24-month horizon (i.e., poverty reduction LARGER than 3pp would refute the under-delivery framing).
formal test & threshold
test: descriptive_take_up_and_poverty_gap_24mo threshold: take_up_2022 < 0.60 AND poverty_gap >= -3pp
Method
- Template
descriptive- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 4 countries · 2015 – 2023
- Evidence type
- associational
Descriptive comparison of ESP take-up trajectory and post-IMV poverty path against southern-EU peers. No causal claim beyond the take-up failure — the under-delivery is a design-and-administration outcome.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
extreme_poverty_rate outcome | eurostat:ilc_mddd11tier 1 | level_pct |
imv_take_up_rate_eligibles outcome | eurostat:ilc_li02tier 1 | ratio |
imv_indicator treatment | eurostat:ilc_mddd11tier 1 | indicator |
gdp_per_capita_real control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | log |
unemployment_rate control | eurostat:une_rt_atier 1 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — welfare_transfer_spain_imv_poverty_effect
Verdict: REFUTED — shape=panel_summary, sign + OPPOSITE claim -; |Δ_log|=0.398, ratio=1.49; threshold 3.0%, observed 39.8%
Pre-registration
- Claim: Spain's Ingreso Mínimo Vital (IMV, June 2020 emergency-launched during COVID) reached fewer than half of intended-eligible households within 24 months due to take-up frictions, producing a measured reduction in extreme-poverty headcount of less than 3 percentage points by 2022 — well below the pre-launch government estimate of 7-10pp — and providing a natural test of unconditional-floor design in a high-frictions administrative environment.
- Falsification rule: Refuted if IMV take-up (recipients / eligible households) exceeds 60% by end-2022, OR if the extreme-poverty-rate gap with donor pool exceeds minus-3pp at 24-month horizon (i.e., poverty reduction LARGER than 3pp would refute the under-delivery framing).
- Falsification test: descriptive_take_up_and_poverty_gap_24mo
Comparison
- shape: panel_summary
- treatment_country: ESP
- treatment_value: 270.0057189542484
- donor_pool_median: 181.43611111111113
- ratio: 1.4881586543094356
- log_diff: 0.39753955324690526
- n_donor_countries: 3
- end_year_window: [2018, 2023]
Extracted threshold: {'percent': 3.0, 'pp': 10.0}
Variables resolved
eurostat:ilc_mddd11→ extreme_poverty_rate (outcome, publisher=eurostat, n=653)eurostat:ilc_li02→ imv_take_up_rate_eligibles (outcome, publisher=eurostat, n=976)eurostat:ilc_mddd11→ imv_indicator (treatment, publisher=eurostat, n=653)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD→ gdp_per_capita_real (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=14066)eurostat:une_rt_a→ unemployment_rate (controls, publisher=eurostat, n=634)
Generated by scripts/run_descriptive.py at 2026-04-30T12:52:14+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.