Pre-registration
In a panel of advanced economies 1987-2007, base-money expansion and broad money growth correlate positively with asset-price indices (equity, real estate) but only weakly with headline CPI inflation. This dissociation — money flowing into asset markets rather than goods-market prices — is the empirical pattern Austrians (Rothbard, Salerno, Shostak) call "asset-price inflation" and use to argue that CPI-targeting central banks systematically miss the welfare- relevant inflation. The pre-registered claim is that the panel-FE coefficient on broad-money growth in an asset-price-index regression is at least 3x the coefficient in a parallel CPI regression over the same window.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
Hypothesis is falsified if the coefficient on broad-money growth in the asset-price regression is not at least 3x the coefficient in the CPI regression at p<0.05, OR if the asset-price coefficient is itself not positive and significant.
formal test & threshold
test: panel_fe_money_asset_vs_money_cpi_coefficient_ratio threshold: coefficient(money_growth → asset_price_growth) / coefficient(money_growth → cpi_inflation) >= 3.0 AND coefficient(money_growth → asset_price_growth) > 0 at p<0.05
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 12 countries · 1987 – 2007
- Evidence type
- associational
Two parallel panel-FE regressions: (1) real asset-price index growth on broad-money growth and controls; (2) CPI inflation on broad-money growth and the same controls. Test compares the two coefficients via Wald test. Mainstream/monetarist priors expect a CPI-link; finding it absent (or weaker than the asset-link) supports the Austrian "asset inflation" framing. Heterodox null is that the money-asset correlation is an artefact of credit-driven asset accumulation, not a money-disequilibrium phenomenon.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
real_home_price_index outcome | bis:WS_SPPtier 2 | log_diff |
real_equity_price_index outcome | shiller:us_home_price_realtier 3 oecd:share_price_indextier 2 | log_diff |
cpi_inflation_yoy outcome | world_bank_wdi:FP.CPI.TOTL.ZGtier 2 | level |
broad_money_growth_yoy treatment | fred:M2SLtier 1 ecb:BSI.M.U2.Y.V.M30.X.1.U2.2300.Z01.Etier 1 boe:LPMVWYRtier 1 | yoy |
base_money_growth_yoy treatment | fred:BOGMBASEtier 1 | yoy |
real_gdp_growth control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZGtier 2 | level |
short_term_rate control | bis:WS_CBPOLtier 2 | level |
trade_openness control | world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — austrian_monetary_expansion_asset_bubble_not_cpi_panel
Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — insufficient observations after listwise deletion (21)
Pre-registration
- Claim: In a panel of advanced economies 1987-2007, base-money expansion and broad money growth correlate positively with asset-price indices (equity, real estate) but only weakly with headline CPI inflation. This dissociation — money flowing into asset markets rather than goods-market prices — is the empirical pattern Austrians (Rothbard, Salerno, Shostak) call "asset-price inflation" and use to argue that CPI-targeting central banks systematically miss the welfare- relevant inflation. The pre-registered claim is that the panel-FE coefficient on broad-money growth in an asset-price-index regression is at least 3x the coefficient in a parallel CPI regression over the same window.
- Falsification rule: Hypothesis is falsified if the coefficient on broad-money growth in the asset-price regression is not at least 3x the coefficient in the CPI regression at p<0.05, OR if the asset-price coefficient is itself not positive and significant.
- Falsification test: panel_fe_money_asset_vs_money_cpi_coefficient_ratio
Estimate
- Error: insufficient observations after listwise deletion (21)
Variables resolved
bis:WS_SPP→ real_home_price_index (outcome, publisher=bis, n=2272)shiller:us_home_price_real; oecd:share_price_index→ real_equity_price_index (outcome, publisher=shiller, n=134)world_bank_wdi:FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG→ cpi_inflation_yoy (outcome, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=7550)fred:M2SL; ecb:BSI.M.U2.Y.V.M30.X.1.U2.2300.Z01.E; boe:LPMVWYR→ broad_money_growth_yoy (treatment, publisher=fred, n=68)fred:BOGMBASE→ base_money_growth_yoy (treatment, publisher=fred, n=68)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZG→ real_gdp_growth (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=13897)bis:WS_CBPOL→ short_term_rate (controls, publisher=bis, n=2119)world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS→ trade_openness (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=10714)
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:54:08+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
Salerno (1987 "True Money Supply"), Rothbard (1963 America's Great Depression), Shostak (2002 "Defining Inflation"). The hypothesis reframes the standard CPI-targeting consensus as a measurement failure: the welfare-relevant inflation is the one the metric fails to see.