Pre-registration
Large real effective exchange-rate appreciations mean-revert. In the BIS real broad EER panel, a 15 percent or larger three-year REER appreciation should predict subsequent two-year real depreciation or at least materially weaker REER growth.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
Falsified if large three-year REER appreciations do not predict weaker subsequent two-year REER growth after fixed effects, or if the raw appreciation contrast is not economically negative.
formal test & threshold
test: bis_reer_appreciation_reversal_panel threshold: Supported only if coefficient(large_reer_appreciation) <= -2.0 percentage points with cluster-robust p <= 0.05, raw high-minus-normal mean outcome <= -2.0 percentage points, at least 1200 observations, and at least 25 countries. Partial if exactly one of the regression or raw contrast gates clears.
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Fixed effects
country, year- Clustering
country- Sample
- 21 countries · 1994 – 2026
- Evidence type
- associational
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
fwd_reer_growth_8q outcome | bis:WS_EERtier 2 | 100 * log(real_broad_reer_t+8 / real_broad_reer_t) |
large_reer_appreciation treatment | bis:WS_EERtier 2 | indicator(12-quarter log REER growth >= 15 percent) |
reer_appreciation_12q control | bis:WS_EERtier 2 | 100 * log(real_broad_reer_t / real_broad_reer_t-12) |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — bis_reer_appreciation_reversal_panel
Verdict: PARTIAL — coef=+0.5, p=0; claim direction not auto-inferred
Pre-registration
- Claim: Large real effective exchange-rate appreciations mean-revert. In the BIS real broad EER panel, a 15 percent or larger three-year REER appreciation should predict subsequent two-year real depreciation or at least materially weaker REER growth.
- Falsification rule: Falsified if large three-year REER appreciations do not predict weaker subsequent two-year REER growth after fixed effects, or if the raw appreciation contrast is not economically negative.
- Falsification test: bis_reer_appreciation_reversal_panel
Estimate
- Method: statsmodels OLS FE fallback (linearmodels failed: exog does not have full column rank. If you wish to proceed with model estimation irrespective of the numerical accuracy of coefficient estimates, you can set check_rank=False.)
- Coefficient (treatment): +0.5
- Std error: 4.705e-16
- p-value: 0
- Observations: 693, countries: 21
- Within R²: 1
- Fixed effects: entity=True, time=True
- Clustering: country
Variables resolved
bis:WS_EER→ fwd_reer_growth_8q (outcome, publisher=bis, n=2112)bis:WS_EER→ large_reer_appreciation (treatment, publisher=bis, n=2112)bis:WS_EER→ reer_appreciation_12q (controls, publisher=bis, n=2112)
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:54:10+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
Runnable via engine/runs/bis_reer_appreciation_reversal_panel/replication.py. Uses only pinned BIS vintages already on disk.