IESET.
Positions·Scoreboard·classical_liberal

Classical Liberal

Associated proponents:Adam Smith · David Ricardo · John Stuart Mill · Friedrich Hayek · Milton Friedman · Frédéric Bastiat

Axis fingerprint — what this school speaks to

Derived from the steelman + listed predictions. These are the framework axes this school makes empirical claims about. Any hypothesis testing one of these axes is relevant evidence, whether or not the school explicitly cited that hypothesis ID.

product market competitiontrade opennessrule of lawproperty rightsspending levellabour market flexibilityenergy supply securitytransfer expansion

Empirical track record

Of 340 listed predictions, 299 have been tested. 66 supported · 21 partial + · 49 refuted · 1 partial − · 162 inconclusive · 41 pending.
Support rate
56%

Steelman — the strongest version of this school

Voluntary exchange between property-rights-secure parties is the engine of prosperity. Government's legitimate economic functions are limited to: protection of person and property, enforcement of contracts, provision of public goods that markets undersupply, and — in the Millian development — education and some distributional concerns. Tax and regulatory burdens beyond this narrow scope crowd out private initiative, distort price signals, and typically generate deadweight costs larger than their posted benefits. Free trade, sound money, and limited government are the recurring policy recommendations. The doctrine admits of debate on public-goods scope (Smith accepted publicly-funded education; Friedman accepted a negative income tax) without abandoning the central commitment to voluntary exchange as the default allocation mechanism.

Movements that align, oppose, or partially align with this school

Historical movements (parties, governments, doctrinal coalitions) whose programmes the framework codes as aligned with, opposed to, or partially aligned with this school's predictions. Alignment is scored by what the movement enacted on each axis, not by the labels it used.

Aligned126 movements
Menem PJ first term — Convertibility launch, privatisation, Pacto de Olivos
ARG
Menem PJ second term — Tequila effect, privatisation completion, IMF orthodoxy
ARG
Abbott Coalition government (Australia)
AUS
Howard Liberal-National Coalition — GST 2000, gun control, middle-class welfare, WorkChoices, Tampa
AUS
Keating ALP — Working Nation, Mabo, superannuation, 'recession we had to have'
AUS
Schuessel OeVP-FPOe/BZOe coalition 2000-2007
AUT
Sinowatz SPÖ-FPÖ small coalition — verstaatlichte-crisis management
AUT
Vranitzky SPÖ-ÖVP grand coalition — EU accession and ÖIAG privatisation 1986-1997
AUT
Di Rupo PS-led six-party coalition 2011-2014
BEL
Michel MR-led Suédoise centre-right coalition 2014-2019
BEL
Paz Estenssoro MNR 'pacto por la democracia' government 1985-1989
BOL
Sánchez de Lozada I MNR — Capitalización, Participación Popular, Pension reform
BOL
Cardoso II — Real devaluation, inflation targeting, Fiscal Responsibility Law
BRA
Itamar PMDB — Plano Real birth under FHC Finance
BRA
Temer MDB government — orthodox fiscal adjustment post-Dilma (Brazil)
BRA
Harper-era Conservative government (Canada)
CAN
Mulroney PC first term — FTA, privatisation, tax reform
CAN
Mulroney PC second term — GST, NAFTA, Meech/Charlottetown failure
CAN
Frei Ruiz-Tagle Concertación — trade-integration, Asian-crisis test
CHL
Gaviria Liberal — Apertura Económica, 1991 Constitution, BanRep autonomy
COL
Spidla / Gross / Paroubek CSSD-KDU-US coalition 2002-2006
CZE
Fischer technocratic caretaker 2009-2010
CZE
Klaus ODS first government — Czech transition exemplar and 1997 crisis 1993-1997
CZE
Necas ODS-TOP09-VV austerity coalition 2010-2013
CZE
Topolanek ODS-KDU-Greens centre-right flat-tax 2006-2009
CZE
Čalfa Government of National Understanding and Klaus Federal Finance — Czechoslovak transition 1989-1992
CSK
Loekke Rasmussen I continuation government 2009-2011
DNK
Nyrup Rasmussen Social Democrat-led coalitions — active labour market and Maastricht settlement 1993-2001
DNK
Schlüter 'kartoffelkur' — fixed-krone disinflation, fiscal consolidation
DNK
Durán Ballén PUR — Washington Consensus turn, Cenepa war, Brady Plan
ECU
Lasso CREO centre-right banker-technocrat (Ecuador)
ECU
Sadat Infitah — Open Door opening, Camp David, bread riots, assassination
EGY
Aho Centre-led bourgeois government — Great Depression II and EU accession 1991-1995
FIN
Katainen Kokoomus-led six-party coalition 2011-2014
FIN
Lipponen rainbow coalitions — EMU membership and Nokia-era structural reforms 1995-2003
FIN
Mitsotakis Sr. ND: stabilisation, privatisations, austerity programme
GRC
Papandreou PASOK crisis-and-first-Memoranda government 2009-2011
GRC
Antall-Boross MDF conservative government — gradualist transition 1990-1994
HUN
Gyurcsany MSZP-SZDSZ reform and austerity 2004-2009
HUN
Horn MSZP-SZDSZ coalition — Bokros package shock orthodoxy under socialist banner 1994-1998
HUN
Kádár MSZMP 'goulash communism' — New Economic Mechanism to late-era decay
HUN
Németh MSZMP/MSZP transitional reform government — negotiated transition 1988-1990
HUN
Narasimha Rao INC — Manmohan Singh 1991 liberalisation (India)
IND
Vajpayee BJP/NDA — liberal-Hindutva reformist coalition (1998-2004)
IND
B. J. Habibie transitional presidency — reformasi opening and East Timor referendum (1998-1999)
IDN
Megawati Sukarnoputri — PDI-P-led secular-nationalist stabilisation (2001-2004)
IDN
Khatami Reformist era — civil-society opening, Article 44 privatisation debate, Axis of Evil response, nuclear disclosure
IRN
Cowen Fianna Fáil GFC-and-bailout government 2008-2011
IRL
Haughey return: Tallaght Strategy, PNR, IFSC, Celtic Tiger foundations
IRL
Netanyahu Likud I — supply-side pivot, Wye River stall, Oslo slowdown
ISR
Netanyahu II Likud government (Israel)
ISR
Netanyahu III-IV Likud governments (Israel)
ISR
Peres Labor transition — post-assassination continuation, 1996 election loss
ISR
Peres National Unity government — July 1985 Stabilization Plan
ISR
Letta PD-PdL Grand Coalition 2013-2014
ITA
Monti technocratic emergency government 2011-2013
ITA
Hashimoto LDP — Big Bang financial reform and Asian-crisis response (1996-1998)
JPN
Koizumi LDP — supply-side structural reform and postal privatisation (2001-2006)
JPN
Noda DPJ — consumption-tax hike framework and DPJ collapse
JPN
Lee Kuan Yew + PAP founding-era Singapore (1955-1990)
SGP
De la Madrid PRI — IMF austerity, opening, 1985 earthquake
MEX
Peña Nieto PRI modernising-neoliberal + Pacto por México reforms
MEX
Mexico Salinas PRI neoliberal turn + NAFTA
MEX
Zedillo PRI — Tequila crisis, FOBAPROA, democratic opening
MEX
Rutte I VVD-CDA minority with PVV parliamentary support 2010-2012
NLD
Rutte II VVD-PvdA purple-red-blue coalition 2012-2017
NLD
Bolger National — Mother of All Budgets, Employment Contracts Act, MMP referendum
NZL
Hipkins Labour — transitional caretaker (NZ Jan-Nov 2023)
NZL
Key National government (New Zealand)
NZL
Shipley National — first female NZ PM, brief transitional government under MMP
NZL
Babangida military — SAP-imposed neoliberalism, annulled June 12 1993 election
NGA
Obasanjo PDP civilian return — NEEDS reform, Paris Club debt relief, telecom privatisation
NGA
Bondevik II KrF-H-V centre-right coalition 2001-2005
NOR
Brundtland AP governments II-III — petroleum wealth architecture and EU rejection 1986-1996
NOR
Willoch Høyre — liberalisation, housing-credit deregulation, broadcasting monopoly end
NOR
Pervez Musharraf military government — Enlightened Moderation and 9/11 pivot (1999-2008)
PAK
Nawaz Sharif IJI/PML-N first term — privatisation launch (Pakistan)
PAK
Peel ministry + Corn Law repeal (UK 1841-1846)
GBR
Toledo Perú Posible — democratic restoration, US FTA, mining-boom orthodoxy
PER
Cory Aquino post-EDSA democratic transition (Philippines)
PHL
Fidel Ramos Philippines 2000 tiger-economy push (Philippines)
PHL
Buzek AWS-UW four-reforms coalition 1997-2001
POL
Mazowiecki Solidarity government — Balcerowicz Plan shock therapy 1989-1991
POL
Miller/Belka SLD-UP-PSL EU-accession government 2001-2005
POL
SLD-PSL post-communist coalition — transition continuation and NIF privatisation 1993-1997
POL
Bielecki, Olszewski, Pawlak-1, Suchocka — Solidarity-era fragmentation and transition consolidation 1991-1993
POL
Cavaco Silva PSD: IMF exit, EEC entry, liberalisations and privatisations
PRT
Iliescu FSN/FDSN/PDSR governments — Romanian gradualism and mineriade 1990-1996
ROU
Abdullah de-facto regency as Crown Prince — cautious liberalisation, post-9/11 recalibration, WTO accession
SAU
King Fahd early era — oil-glut adjustment, riyal peg, Gulf War financing
SAU
Fahd Gulf-War fiscal recycling and 1994 budget reform
SAU
Kim Dae-jung — Sunshine Policy and IMF-conditioned chaebol reform (1998-2003)
KOR
Kim Young-sam segyehwa globalisation — IMF crisis endpoint (South Korea)
KOR
Lee Myung-bak Grand National business-friendly era
KOR
Dzurinda SDKU flat-tax EU-NATO convergence 1998-2006
SVK
Radicova SDKU-DS centre-right coalition 2010-2012
SVK
Aznar PP first and second terms (combined)
ESP
Rajoy I PP absolute-majority austerity and banking-bailout government 2011-2015
ESP
Zapatero II PSOE GFC-and-reversal government 2008-2011
ESP
Sri Lanka 1977 Open Economy reforms
LKA
Bildt four-party centre-right coalition — crisis management and systemic shift 1991-1994
SWE
Carlsson SAP government — late Swedish model under strain 1986-1991
SWE
Carlsson SAP return — crisis consolidation and EU accession 1994-1996
SWE
Reinfeldt Moderate-led Alliance 2006-2014
SWE
Swiss Zauberformel consensus — 2-2-2-1 Federal Council stability era
CHE
Swiss Federal Council ordoliberal continuity 1992-present
CHE
KMT developmentalist Taiwan (Chiang Ching-kuo + Lee Teng-hui era, 1961-2000)
TWN
Anand Panyarachun technocratic interim governments (Thailand)
THA
Chuan Leekpai II Democrat — IMF-programme-implementation government (1997-2001)
THA
Chuan Leekpai Democrat Party first term (Thailand)
THA
Evren military government — coup consolidation, Özal stabilisation continuation
TUR
Özal market liberalisation (Turkey)
TUR
Turkey pre-coup instability — Demirel/Ecevit rotation, BoP crisis, January 24 package
TUR
Yılmaz ANAP and Ecevit DSP coalitions — 2001 banking crisis, Derviş $16bn programme, Copenhagen criteria preparation
TUR
Zayed late era — Jebel Ali scale-up, Emirates expansion, DIFC launch, post-9/11 reputation management
ARE
Zayed oil-glut response — Abu Dhabi transfers, Dubai trade pivot
ARE
UK Cameron–Osborne austerity
GBR
Thatcher first term: disinflation, MTFS, opening privatisations
GBR
Thatcher second term: Miners' Strike, Big Bang, BT and British Gas privatisations
GBR
Thatcher third term: Poll Tax, Lawson Boom, ERM entry
GBR
Lacalle Pou Coalición Multicolor — centre-right structural reform 2020-2025
URY
Reagan first term — supply-side + Volcker disinflation + defence buildup
USA
Reagan second term — TRA 1986, Cold War endgame, S&L, Black Monday
USA
Pérez AD second term — Gran Viraje, Caracazo, Chávez coups, impeachment
VEN
Nguyễn Xuân Phúc PM era — CPTPP and early COVID success
VNM
Post-Tito collective presidency — IMF austerity, inflation, republican breakdown
YUG
Opposed113 movements
Duhalde PJ transition — pesificación asymmetric devaluation, Jefes y Jefas
ARG
Albanese Labor — cautious-progressive restoration 2022-present
AUS
Faymann SPOe-OeVP grand coalition 2008-2016
AUT
Gusenbauer SPOe-OeVP grand coalition 2007-2008
AUT
Kern SPOe-OeVP grand coalition 2016-2017
AUT
Kreisky SPÖ era — Austro-Keynesian corporatism and hard-schilling peg
AUT
Lukashenko state-capitalist continuity (Belarus, 1994-present)
BLR
Leterme–Van Rompuy CD&V-led GFC governments 2008-2009
BEL
Arce MAS model-preservation and dollar crisis (Bolivia)
BOL
MAS extractivist-redistributive model (Bolivia)
BOL
Morales third-term entrenchment and 2019 crisis (Bolivia)
BOL
Bulgarian communist state-building and planning (1944-1989)
BGR
Trudeau (Pierre) Liberal restoration — NEP, Patriation, Charter
CAN
Xi Jinping era — common prosperity, SOE reassertion, security primacy
CHN
Samper Liberal — Proceso 8000, Tequila contagion, apertura backlash
COL
Babis ANO-CSSD minority with KSCM tolerance 2017-2021
CZE
Sobotka CSSD-ANO-KDU-CSL coalition 2014-2017
CZE
Husák 'normalizace' KSČ — post-Prague-Spring orthodox planning
CSK
Anker Jørgensen Socialdemokraterne — crisis Keynesianism and 'kartoffelkur' prelude
DNK
Bucaram PRE — El Loco populism, mental-incapacity removal
ECU
Morsi / Muslim Brotherhood Freedom and Justice Party presidency
EGY
Mubarak early era — post-assassination consolidation, 1986-88 IMF, Gulf-War debt relief
EGY
Sisi second term — constitutional amendment, New Administrative Capital, Hayah Karima
EGY
Imperial Germany tariff-social-insurance state
DEU
Merkel I CDU/CSU-SPD Grand Coalition 2005-2009
DEU
Merkel III CDU/CSU-SPD Grand Coalition 2013-2017
DEU
Merkel IV CDU/CSU-SPD Grand Coalition 2018-2021
DEU
Medgyessy MSZP-SZDSZ 100-days package 2002-2004
HUN
Orbán Fidesz second and third terms — illiberal-democracy foundation (Hungary)
HUN
Orbán Fidesz fourth term — consolidated illiberal-democratic statism (Hungary)
HUN
Indira Gandhi return — INC(I) statist consolidation (India)
IND
Singh UPA-II — rights-based entitlement expansion (India)
IND
India pre-1991 planned-economy / License Raj
IND
V.P. Singh Janata Dal National Front minority (India)
IND
Khomeini revolutionary consolidation — Islamic Republic founding, nationalisations, war economy
IRN
Raisi principlist-conservative government (Iran)
IRN
Shah late era — oil-boom overstretch, inflation, revolution
IRN
Barak One Israel — Camp David II, Lebanon withdrawal, failed grand-bargain peace push
ISR
Begin Likud — economic liberalisation attempt, inflation spiral, settlement expansion
ISR
Netanyahu sixth government 2022–present
ISR
Shamir Likud first term — bank-shares crash and hyperinflation peak
ISR
Fascist corporatist state and state-directed capitalism (Italy)
ITA
Gentiloni PD caretaker-continuity government 2016-2018
ITA
Italy Meloni centre-right coalition (FdI–Lega–FI) 2022-present
ITA
Fukuda-Asō late LDP — GFC crisis response cabinets
JPN
Hatoyama DPJ — regime change and Futenma collapse
JPN
Murayama SDPJ-LDP-Sakigake grand coalition (Japan)
JPN
Obuchi-Mori LDP — fiscal-stimulus lost-decade response (1998-2001)
JPN
Late Meiji-Taisho state-building and managed social incorporation
JPN
Takaichi LDP government and Second Takaichi Cabinet
JPN
Kibaki NARC first term — growth takeoff, Anglo-Leasing scandal, 2005 referendum NO, 2007 post-election violence
KEN
Khmer Rouge Democratic Kampuchea
KHM
Mahathir early era — Look East + heavy industry (Malaysia)
MYS
AMLO Cuarta Transformación — Morena heterodox-populist turn
MEX
López Portillo PRI — oil boom to 1982 debt-crisis bank nationalisation
MEX
Sheinbaum Morena continuity + judicial-reform consolidation
MEX
Burmese Way to Socialism
MMR
Muldoon National — Think Big, wage-price freeze, exchange crisis, snap-election collapse
NZL
Ortega-Murillo FSLN consolidation 2007-present
NIC
Abacha military — kleptocratic dirigisme, Ogoni Nine, sanctions and debt talks
NGA
Buhari military government — War Against Indiscipline, austerity, IMF rejection
NGA
Obasanjo military (first) — indigenisation, oil-rent spending, transition to civilian rule
NGA
Shagari Second Republic — oil-bust fiscal crisis, austerity, coup end
NGA
Cross-administration US energy-regulation regime 1973-1981
USA
Norway Jagland AP + Bondevik I centre coalition 1996-2000
NOR
Bhutto nationalisations (Pakistan)
PAK
Gilani-Zardari PPP — 18th Amendment, NFC Award, energy-crisis cabinet
PAK
García APRA first term — heterodox shock, debt-service limit, hyperinflation
PER
Philippines Marcos authoritarian economy
PHL
Marcos late-martial-law crony capitalism (Philippines)
PHL
Morawiecki PiS government — consolidated national-conservative governance (Poland)
POL
PiS Marcinkiewicz/Kaczynski Fourth Republic government 2005-2007
POL
Putin fifth term entrenched war economy 2024-present
RUS
Putin first term vertical-of-power and 13% flat tax 2000-2004
RUS
Putin fourth term full-scale Ukraine invasion and war economy 2018-2024
RUS
Putin second term state capitalism consolidation 2004-2008
RUS
Kagame fourth elected term 2024-present
RWA
King Khalid era — oil-boom state-building and post-Grand-Mosque consolidation
SAU
Chun Doo-hwan military Fifth Republic (South Korea)
KOR
Fico fourth government Smer-SD + Hlas + SNS 2023-present
SVK
Fico Smer II and III 2012-2018
SVK
Mečiar HZDS governments — national-populist crony privatisation 1993-1998
SVK
Pellegrini Smer-SNS-Most-Hid 2018-2020
SVK
Gotabaya Rajapaksa SLPP — Vistas of Prosperity (Sri Lanka)
LKA
Andersson Social Democratic minority government (Sweden, 2021-2022)
SWE
Fälldin non-socialist coalitions — end of SAP 44-year hegemony
SWE
Palme SAP second term — third way, wage-earner funds, devaluation
SWE
Syria Ba'ath-Assad statist regime
SYR
Paetongtarn Shinawatra — Pheu Thai-led coalition (2024-present)
THA
Prayut Chan-o-cha — NCPO junta then Palang Pracharath elected-junta (2014-2023)
THA
Samak-Somchai PPP — Thaksin-proxy cabinets and yellow-shirt siege
THA
Srettha Thavisin — Pheu Thai-led post-Move-Forward coalition (2023-2024)
THA
Surayud military-interim government post-September 2006 coup
THA
Thaksin Thai Rak Thai — pro-rural populist heterodox presidency (2001-2006)
THA
Yingluck Pheu Thai — rice-pledging and amnesty-bill coup
THA
Erbakan Refah coalition — Islamist government cut short by 28 February 1997 postmodern coup
TUR
Erdoğan / AKP supermajority phase (Turkey 2011-2018)
TUR
Erdoğan third presidential term — Şimşek orthodox pivot (Turkey 2023-present)
TUR
Brexit — UK departure from EU
GBR
UK Brown Labour GFC-Keynesian stewardship 2007-2010
GBR
UK industrial energy cost regime
GBR
UK May Conservative Brexit-negotiation government 2016-2019
GBR
UK planning-restriction regime persistence
GBR
Biden administration — Bidenomics industrial-policy progressivism (USA)
USA
FDR New Deal
USA
LBJ Great Society + War on Poverty
USA
Obama ARRA + Dodd-Frank + ACA
USA
Trump second term — MAGA-populist economic nationalism (USA)
USA
Chavismo / Bolivarian Revolution (Venezuela)
VEN
Pérez AD first term — oil nationalisation, 'Gran Venezuela'
VEN
Le Duan post-reunification socialist reconstruction (Vietnam)
VNM
Mobutu MPR resource-state authoritarianism
COD
Mnangagwa ZANU-PF 'Second Republic' 2017-present
ZWE
Partially aligned156 movements
Proceso de Reorganización Nacional — military junta (Videla-Galtieri-Bignone)
ARG
Fraser Liberal-National government — Whitlam dismissal successor, Campbell inquiry, stagflation
AUS
Morrison Liberal-National Coalition — pro-business plus COVID fiscal 2018-2022
AUS
Turnbull Liberal-National Coalition — small-l liberal reformer constrained 2015-2018
AUS
Martens CVP-led coalitions (Belgium): devaluation, indexation adjustment, federalisation
BEL
Verhofstadt Paars-groen then Paars liberal governments
BEL
Áñez conservative transitional government (Bolivia)
BOL
Banzer ADN — Plan Dignidad coca eradication, Cochabamba water war, early exit
BOL
Sánchez de Lozada II — Gas War, impuestazo 2003, forced resignation
BOL
Bolsonaro government — right-populist with liberal economic team (Brazil)
BRA
Collor PRN — Plano Collor, liberalisation, impeachment
BRA
Carney-era Liberal government (Canada)
CAN
Chrétien Liberal first term — Martin Budget 1995 deficit slaying
CAN
Lagos Concertación — AUGE health, US FTA, constitutional reform 2005
CHL
Tiananmen austerity and Deng's Southern Tour reset (China)
CHN
Duque — Centro Democrático Uribista restoration (Colombia)
COL
Pastrana Conservative — Caguán peace attempt, Plan Colombia, recession
COL
Santos II — Unidad Nacional, FARC peace and OECD convergence (Colombia)
COL
Colombia market-continuity era — Uribe / Santos / Duque (2002-2022)
COL
Uribe democratic security and market-friendly reforms (Colombia)
COL
Houphouet-Boigny export-developmental cocoa state
CIV
Fiala SPOLU + Pirates/STAN coalition 2021-2025
CZE
Noboa ADN security-first reformist (Ecuador)
ECU
Egypt Economic Reform and Structural Adjustment (late Mubarak)
EGY
Sisi third term — Ras El-Hekma shock, second EGP float, IMF expansion
EGY
Bukele first-term Nuevas Ideas consolidation (El Salvador)
SLV
Bukele second-term Nuevas Ideas consolidation (El Salvador)
SLV
Kiviniemi Centre-led caretaker 2010-2011
FIN
Koivisto-Sorsa SDP era — consensus corporatism under Finlandisation
FIN
Sipilä liberal-agrarian structural-reform cabinet (Finland, 2015-2019)
FIN
Stubb Kokoomus-led continuation 2014-2015
FIN
Vanhanen II Centre-led coalition 2007-2010
FIN
Giscard d'Estaing centrist-liberal presidency (France)
FRA
Third Republic radical republican reformism (France)
FRA
Kohl CDU-CSU-FDP early coalition: die Wende and consolidated ordoliberalism
DEU
Kohl reunification and EMU-convergence era
DEU
Merkel II CDU/CSU-FDP centre-right coalition 2009-2013
DEU
Merz CDU/CSU-SPD grand coalition 2025-present
DEU
Karamanlis New Democracy (Greece): Metapolitefsi stabilisation and EEC accession
GRC
Kostas Karamanlis ND centre-right government
GRC
Papademos technocratic national-unity government 2011-2012
GRC
Gyurcsány–Bajnai MSZP-SZDSZ era — post-communist social-democracy and IMF stand-by (Hungary)
HUN
Orban FIDESZ first term centrist-reformer 1998-2002
HUN
Congress founding consensus - Constitution and mixed economy (India)
IND
Janata Party Desai government post-Emergency (India)
IND
Late Raj constitutional devolution and state-building (India)
IND
Manmohan Singh UPA-I — rights-based welfare plus liberalisation continuity (2004-2009)
IND
Modi first + second term — Hindutva-economic-nationalism + supply-side reform (India)
IND
Modi third term — coalition NDA 3.0 (India)
IND
Rajiv Gandhi Congress — technocratic early liberalisation (India)
IND
Suharto deregulation paket era — pre-crisis liberalisation (Indonesia)
IDN
Suharto New Order oil-boom + Pertamina crisis + Pancasila economy (Indonesia)
IDN
Abdurrahman Wahid (Gus Dur) — PKB-led reformasi presidency (1999-2001)
IDN
Ahmadinejad principlist populist government (Iran)
IRN
Pezeshkian reformist-aligned government (Iran)
IRN
Rafsanjani pragmatist reconstruction — post-Khomeini liberalisation under clerical constraint
IRN
Rouhani moderate-reformist government (Iran)
IRN
Ahern Fianna Fáil-PD-Green era: Celtic Tiger peak
IRL
Bruton Rainbow Coalition: Celtic Tiger takeoff
IRL
Kenny Fine Gael-Labour and FG-minority bailout-exit governments 2011-2017
IRL
Bennett–Lapid 'Change Coalition' 2021–2022
ISR
Lapid caretaker government 2022
ISR
Netanyahu V emergency unity government (Israel)
ISR
Olmert Kadima centrist government (Israel)
ISR
Rabin Labor government — Oslo Accords and economic-peace doctrine
ISR
Shamir Likud second term — post-stabilisation liberalisation, Soviet aliyah absorption
ISR
Sharon Likud/Kadima — Second Intifada containment, Netanyahu 2003 reform, Gaza disengagement, Kadima breakaway
ISR
Berlusconi I: Forza Italia-Lega-AN coalition
ITA
Berlusconi II and III: Casa delle Libertà
ITA
Berlusconi IV PdL-Lega Nord GFC-era government 2008-2011
ITA
Giolittian liberal reformism and state-building (Italy)
ITA
Prodi II Unione centre-left coalition 2006-2008
ITA
Renzi PD reformist government 2014-2016
ITA
Abe I LDP first cabinet — beautiful country conservatism
JPN
Ishiba LDP-Komeito minority government
JPN
Kan DPJ — Tōhoku/Fukushima crisis cabinet
JPN
Kishida LDP — 'new form of capitalism' (Atarashii Shihon-shugi)
JPN
LDP bubble-era governance — Takeshita to Miyazawa (Japan)
JPN
Nakasone privatisation-reform LDP (Japan)
JPN
Hosokawa–Hata non-LDP reform interlude (Japan)
JPN
Suga LDP transitional government
JPN
Kibaki-Odinga grand-coalition government (Kenya)
KEN
Moi KANU era — Nyayoism, one-party state, IMF-SAP, belated liberalisation
KEN
Aoun-Salam post-war reconstruction government 2025-present
LBN
Abdullah Badawi UMNO/BN — Islam Hadhari and anti-corruption rhetoric administration (2003-2009)
MYS
Mahathir Wawasan 2020 Vision and Asian-crisis response (Malaysia)
MYS
Najib BN — 1MDB kleptocracy, GST, and ETP market opening
MYS
Fox PAN — first non-PRI presidency, democratic alternancia, market continuity
MEX
Morocco monarchy-led mixed economy and administrative consolidation
MAR
Balkenende I and II CDA-led centre-right
NLD
Lubbers I-II CDA cabinets (Netherlands): Wassenaar and the no-nonsense adjustment
NLD
Clark Labour three terms — KiwiBank, Working for Families, Civil Union, anti-nuclear foreign policy
NZL
English National government (New Zealand)
NZL
Nordli / Brundtland I Labour governments — oil-era counter-cyclical Keynesianism
NOR
Solberg Conservative-led centre-right government (Norway)
NOR
Benazir Bhutto PPP first term (Pakistan)
PAK
Benazir Bhutto PPP second term — privatisation continuation (Pakistan)
PAK
Imran Khan PTI — Naya Pakistan / Ehsaas (Pakistan)
PAK
Nawaz Sharif PML-N II — heavy-mandate premiership, nuclear tests and Kargil (1997-1999)
PAK
Nawaz Sharif PML-N third term — CPEC launch and IMF stabilisation (Pakistan)
PAK
Shehbaz Sharif PML-N+PPP coalition — IMF stabilisation and SIFC (Pakistan)
PAK
Zia ul-Haq Islamisation + denationalisation military era (Pakistan)
PAK
Pena Colorado government - administrative centralisation and targeted programmes (Paraguay)
PRY
Boluarte post-Castillo government (Peru)
PER
Fujimori autogolpe — 5 April 1992 self-coup and constitutional rupture
PER
Fujimori stabilisation and liberalisation (Peru)
PER
García APRA II — heterodox-turned-orthodox, 'dog in the manger', Bagua
PER
Vizcarra — anti-corruption reformer (Peru)
PER
Philippines Aquino III Daang Matuwid
PHL
Gloria Macapagal Arroyo Lakas-CMD — post-EDSA-II technocratic fiscal reform presidency (2001-2010)
PHL
Philippines Duterte PDP-Laban era
PHL
Joseph Estrada LAMMP — populist-nationalist interrupted presidency (1998-2001)
PHL
Philippines Marcos Jr restoration (Bongbong)
PHL
Jaruzelski martial-law PZPR — WRON, price reform, Round Table
POL
Tusk KO-led centrist coalition — pro-EU rule-of-law restoration (Poland)
POL
Tusk PO-PSL coalition 2007-2014
POL
Durão Barroso PSD-CDS centre-right government
PRT
Dan-Bolojan reformist consolidation 2025-present
ROU
Gorbachev CPSU — perestroika, glasnost, and Soviet dissolution 1985-1991
SUN
Medvedev presidency tandem with Putin-PM 2008-2012
RUS
Yeltsin second term GKO default and oligarch era 1996-1999
RUS
MBS Crown Prince era (de-facto rule)
SAU
Saudi Vision 2030 diversification programme
SAU
Park Geun-hye Saenuri — Creative Economy and impeachment
KOR
Roh Moo-hyun — Uri-led participatory reform plus KORUS FTA (2003-2008)
KOR
Roh Tae-woo Democratic Justice Party — Nordpolitik transition (South Korea)
KOR
Fico Smer first-term euro-adoption social democracy 2006-2010
SVK
Wickremesinghe UNP transitional — IMF crisis executor (Sri Lanka)
LKA
Kristersson centre-right bloc with Sweden Democrats (Tidö agreement)
SWE
Löfven SAP-led red-green governments (Sweden, 2014-2021)
SWE
Abhisit Democrat — red-shirt crackdown and Bangkok-middle-class restoration
THA
Chatichai Choonhavan Chart Thai — battlefields-to-marketplaces (Thailand)
THA
Chavalit Yongchaiyudh NAP — Baht-float crisis-triggering government (1996-1997)
THA
Prem Tinsulanonda semi-democratic technocracy (Thailand)
THA
Çiller DYP — 1994 currency crisis, EU customs union, Erbakan coalition
TUR
AKP / Erdoğan governance (Turkey)
TUR
UAE federal state capitalism and free-zone diversification
ARE
Khalifa early era: Dubai debt crisis, Abu Dhabi bailout, state-capitalism expansion
ARE
MBZ de-facto rule: Abraham Accords, Expo 2020, Covid and Yemen
ARE
MBZ formal federal presidency: AI-emirate pivot and fiscal broadening
ARE
Zayed federation-consolidation — oil-boom federal state-capitalism
ARE
Blair New Labour first and second terms
GBR
New Liberalism and prewar welfare reforms (UK)
GBR
Ukraine independence and early market transition (1991-1999)
UKR
Bush 41 Republican — 1990 budget deal, Gulf War, ADA, FIRREA
USA
Bush 43 first term — 9/11, Patriot Act, tax cuts, Afghanistan+Iraq, SOX, Medicare Part D
USA
Carter deregulation + stagflation-era adjustments
USA
Clinton first term — OBRA 1993, NAFTA, HillaryCare failure, Welfare Reform
USA
Clinton II — Balanced Budget, GLB, surplus peak, impeachment
USA
US Progressive Era reform consensus
USA
Trump first term — Republican supply-side + tariff-mercantilism fusion (USA)
USA
Đỗ Mười General Secretary era — reform consolidation (Vietnam)
VNM
Phan Văn Khải PM plus Nông Đức Mạnh CPV General Secretary — Đổi Mới deepening and WTO-track opening (1997-2006)
VNM
Nguyễn Văn Linh Đổi Mới implementation (Vietnam)
VNM
Tito late era — Associated Labour Law, peak self-management model
YUG
Hichilema UPND reformist government 2021-present
ZMB

Specific predictions — live empirical status

refutes

Trajectory analysis of liberalisation episodes shows output growth follows reforms (not precedes them).

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:liberalisation_episodes_growth_trajectory
refuted — Both the post-reform growth pickup and the clean-pre-trend conditions fail. h=3 -0.47pp (p=0.30); h=5 +1.99pp (p=0.17); h=10 +0.34pp (p=0.68). Pre-trends: h=-3 -1.28pp; h=-5 +5.62pp.
test failed

Property-rights and rule-of-law indices (WGI, Heritage) predict per-capita-income levels and growth rates in cross-country panel regressions, controlling for geography and initial conditions.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:rule_of_law_institutional_growth
PARTIAL — coef=+5.028e-17, p=0.0526; effect magnitude effectively zero
supports

Economic-freedom indices (Fraser, Heritage) correlate positively with per-capita income levels across countries, with the strongest sub-indices being legal-system and sound-money.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:economic_freedom_index_income_correlation
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.1471 (sign matches claim +), p=0.00098
partial +

Trade liberalisation episodes (China 1978, India 1991, NZ Rogernomics, EU single market 1993, China WTO 2001) are followed within a decade by per-capita income acceleration relative to counterfactual non-reform paths.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:trade_liberalisation_growth_effect
PARTIAL — ATT=+6.139e-12, p=0.285, N=584, treated_countries=29 (above α=0.10)
refutes

Thatcher-era UK privatisations (BT, British Gas, BA, water utilities) produced measurable productivity gains and price reductions in the privatised sectors, net of cost-shifting concerns.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:privatisation_productivity_effect
refuted — GBR TFP growth FELL post-1984 (-0.51pp/yr, pre +0.97% → post +0.46%) AND underperformed the comparator-OECD mean (-0.55pp/yr; comparator post +1.01%). The productivity-from-privatisation premise does not show in PWT country-level TFP.
refutes

NZ Rogernomics 1984–1993 liberalisation (tariff removal, SOE corporatisation, financial-market liberalisation) produced productivity acceleration and real-income gains over 1990s–2000s relative to pre-reform trend.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:nz_rogernomics_productivity_effect
refuted — NZ synthetic-control log-TFP gap mean over 1995-2005 = -3.80% (<= 0); informative log GDP-pc gap = -22.70%. Productivity acceleration claim not supported by the data: NZ TFP sits at or below its synthetic counterfactual built from 8 donor advanced economies.
refutes

Mitterrand's 1981–1983 French nationalisations reduced productivity and required the 1983 'tournant de la rigueur' reversal, vindicating the classical-liberal diagnosis that political ownership distorts resource allocation.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:mitterrand_nationalisations_productivity_effect
refuted — French TFP was +2.19% ABOVE its 1975-80 pre-trend (net of European-peer controls) during the 1981-83 active-nationalisation window, not below it. The productivity-damage premise is not visible at the country level.
partial −

Reagan's 1981–1986 marginal-tax-rate reductions produced measurable labour-supply response at the top of the distribution, with output growth exceeding the pre-reform trend.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:reagan_tax_cuts_growth_effect
PARTIAL — shape=TWFE, coef=+0.006685, p=0.827 (above α=0.10)
supports

Price controls under the US 1973-1981 oil price-control regime and Chavismo Venezuela produced the shortage-quality-degradation-black-market pattern predicted by classical price theory, not the consumer-welfare gains controls advocates project.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:price_controls_shortage_effect
SUPPORTED — all 4 canonical episodes show the shortage signature (parallel ratio > 1.5 or post/pre inflation >= 1.5x). Aggregate event-time ATT (post 0..+5, log-inflation) = +0.507.
refutes

Clinton's 1996 welfare reform (TANF, work requirements) increased low-skill labour-force participation and reduced caseloads without the catastrophic child-poverty outcomes critics predicted.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:clinton_welfare_reform_labour_participation_effect
REFUTED — shape=ITS, sign - OPPOSITE claim +, mean_gap=-2.02, z=-8.8
test failed

The v1 decomposition (three channels: WGI gov effectiveness, WGI rule of law, IMF debt/GDP) left 98% of the Nordic-vs-Southern-Europe log GDP/capita gap unexplained

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:nordic_outcome_persistence_decomposition_v2
PARTIAL — coef=-0.1578, p=0.211 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial +

El Salvador's ~98% homicide-rate decline from 103/100k (2015) to 2.4/100k (2023) — with the sharpest decline occurring after the Mar 2022 régimen de excepción and the Jan 2023 CECOT opening — is causally attributable ...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bukele_mass_incarceration_homicide_impact_2019_2024
PARTIAL — mean_gap=+27.06, |gap|/pre_sd=2.4, p_perm=0.222 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)
test failed

El Salvador's fiscal trajectory under Bukele (2019-2024) shows improvement in the primary balance and stabilisation (or modest decline) in debt-to-GDP after the 2020 COVID spike, achieved via a combination of: (a) the...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bukele_fiscal_trajectory_tax_cuts_imf_2019_2024
PARTIAL — coef=-1.313, p=0.293 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
partial +

Large-scale universal or near-universal transfer programmes produce a three-order causal chain

partial — Prime-age LFP fell by ≥1.0pp in 2/5 cases (threshold for SUPPORTED: ≥3). First-order improved in 3/4 cases. Mixed: consistent with the spec's design-dependence caveat — some programmes show the chain, others do not.
test failed

Across the OECD 38, over 2000-latest, larger general government final consumption as a share of GDP is associated with slower growth in real household disposable income per capita, controlling for demographics, initia...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:state_size_reduces_household_income_growth
PARTIAL — coef=-1.248e-17, p=0.809; effect magnitude effectively zero
partial +

The natural-gas price shock that began in late 2021 and intensified after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 produced a measurable differential contraction of EU industrial output relative to US, UK, and...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:eu_post_2021_gas_shock_industrial_output_impact
PARTIAL — ATT=+6.187e+09, p=0.755, N=91, treated_countries=14 (above α=0.10)
partial +

Policy-driven nuclear phaseouts produce a three-order causal chain

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:nuclear_phaseout_energy_cost_industry_exit
PARTIAL — mean_gap=+0.04357, |gap|/pre_sd=8.7, p_perm=0.25; claim direction ambiguous
partial +

German industrial gross value added, manufacturing output, and real household income diverged materially from a synthetic-Germany donor- pool counterfactual over 2018-2025, and a variance decomposition across candidat...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:germany_decline_2018_2025_regulatory_not_fiscal
partial — DEU below synthetic by -0.251 cumulative over 2018-2022 (sign correct), but magnitude or placebo p=0.36363636363636365 below pre-registered thresholds. Regulatory-vs-fiscal channel split unresolved (data-gated).
partial +

Precautionary-principle-based regulation in the EU produces a three-order causal chain relative to the US regulatory baseline

PARTIAL — ATT=+8.614e+04, p=0, N=260, treated_countries=1; claim direction ambiguous
supports

The EU Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals regulation (REACH, entered into force 2007 with phased registration deadlines 2010, 2013, 2018) imposed substantial fixed-cost registration r...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:eu_chemical_reach_regulation_firm_exit_effect
SUPPORTED at aggregate proxy — EU industrial VA per capita post-2007 ATT = -0.0314 log (threshold β<-0.02 met); pre-trend clean. This is stronger than YAML's prior expected; SME-margin test still pending.
partial +

Binding statutory price controls produce a three-order causal chain

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:price_controls_shortage_black_market_progression
PARTIAL — shape=TWFE, coef=+0.5, p=0; claim direction ambiguous
partial +

The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — reporting phase from October 2023, certificate-purchase phase from 2026 — raises the effective landed cost of EU-manufactured CBAM-covered products (steel, aluminium,...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:eu_cbam_export_competitiveness_2023_onwards
WEAKLY SUPPORTED — ATT = -0.0215 log but pre-trend fails; effect identification unreliable.
partial +

Binding rent control initiates a three-order causal chain

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:rent_control_housing_supply_quality_decay_chain
PARTIAL — mean_gap=-1, p_perm=0.333; claim direction ambiguous
partial +

Argentina has experienced 12 distinct episodes of annual inflation exceeding 50% since 1945, each preceded by a fiscal deficit exceeding 4% of GDP financed via central bank money creation

PARTIAL — cointegration rank=1, α_infl=-0.003073235091341579; episode precedence 2/5 below 8/12 threshold.
partial +

Monetary finance of fiscal deficits (central-bank balance-sheet expansion directed at sovereign obligations in the absence of independent policy rate adjustment) produces a three-order causal chain

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:monetary_finance_deficit_currency_collapse_chain
partial — Currency depreciation confirmed in 4/6 cases, but inflation-acceleration second-order response missed: 4/6 (need 5/6). 3rd-order holds, 2nd-order weak.
test failed

Italy's real GDP per capita (PPP, constant international dollars) was approximately unchanged between 1999 (euro launch) and 2023 — a quarter-century of near-zero cumulative growth, with modest levels of variation aro...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:italian_stagnation_decomposition_1999_2023
PARTIAL — coef=-0.001113, p=0.8 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial +

El Salvador's FDI inflow, real-GDP growth, tourism arrivals, and business-formation rate accelerated under the Bukele era (2019-2024) relative to a Central American peer-country donor pool (Honduras, Guatemala, Nicara...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bukele_fdi_gdp_investment_climate_2019_2024
PARTIAL — mean_gap=-0.697, |gap|/pre_sd=1.2, p_perm=1 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)
supports

India's 1991 balance-of-payments-crisis-driven liberalisation programme (Manmohan Singh's package: rupee devaluation, industrial delicensing, trade liberalisation, FDI opening, partial financial- sector reform) produc...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:india_1991_liberalisation_growth_acceleration
SUPPORTED — post-1991 annualised log-growth +4.67%/yr vs pre-1991 +1.96%/yr; acceleration +2.70pp/yr (threshold +2.00pp/yr).
supports

Chile and Venezuela began the 1999-2023 window at broadly comparable GDP per capita (PPP, constant international dollars)

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:chile_vs_venezuela_divergence_1999_2023
SUPPORTED — 2023 log-gap (CHL−VEN) +2.30 (>=1.20). Cumulative growth gap 1999→2023 +1.50 log-points (>=0.60). Chile annualised +2.33%/yr; Venezuela -3.93%/yr.
test failed

Canadian GDP per capita (PPP, constant international dollars) diverged negatively from a donor pool of resource-plus-advanced-anglophone-plus- small-open-developed economies (USA, AUS, NZL, GBR, NOR, CHE) starting aro...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:canada_gdp_per_capita_stagnation_post_2015
PARTIAL — coef=+0.0162, p=0.2 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial +

Sectoral nationalisation produces a three-order causal chain

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:nationalisation_investment_productivity_decline_venezuela
PARTIAL — VEN real GDP -70.9% from 2013 to 2023 vs donor median 15.5% (ARG/CHL/MEX); underperformance 86.4pp
test failed

Spain's headline macroeconomic trajectory under the 2018-present PSOE-led governments is NOT uniformly worse than a peer euro-area donor pool, once euro-area-common shocks (COVID 2020-2021, 2022 energy shock, ECB rate...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:spain_sanchez_economic_trajectory_2018_2023
PARTIAL — coef=+0.009504, p=0.808 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

China's 1978 Deng-era reforms — Household Responsibility System in agriculture, Special Economic Zones, dual-track price liberalisation, Township and Village Enterprise reform, gradual opening to FDI and trade — produ...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:china_deng_reform_growth_acceleration_1978
SUPPORTED — post-1978 annualised log-growth +8.07%/yr vs pre-1978 +3.33%/yr; acceleration +4.74pp/yr (threshold +3.00pp/yr).
supports

Under Financial Secretary John Cowperthwaite (1961–1971) and successors, Hong Kong pursued near-laissez-faire economic policy — no capital controls, no industrial policy, minimal tariffs, low flat taxes, and light lab...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:hong_kong_minimal_state_growth_miracle_1960_1997
SUPPORTED — HKG/USA per-capita ratio 1997 = 0.80 (>=0.80); HKG annualised growth 1960-1997 = +5.22%/yr (>=5.0).
test failed

From 2000 to 2023, Asian economies that continued market-oriented institutional reform from a low starting GDP-per-capita base — China, India, Vietnam, Indonesia, Malaysia, Thailand, Philippines, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:asian_convergence_vs_western_stagnation_2000_2023
PARTIAL — coef=+4.616e-17, p=0.912; effect magnitude effectively zero
refutes

Developmentalist East Asian states (South Korea, Taiwan, Singapore, China) pursuing active industrial policy — export-discipline, selective credit, state-directed FDI screening, targeted sector promotion — achieved hi...

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:industrial_policy_developmentalist_states_growth
SUPPORTED — avg ATT across 4 developmentalist cases (KOR/TWN/SGP/CHN) is +1.088 log-points at 40-yr horizon (~+197%). 4/4 cases above the 30 log-point threshold. Mean per-case placebo rank-p = 0.20. Polity-restricted attenuation check NOT RUN (Polity5 vintage not in repo); the polity-positive subset attenuation gate is DEFERRED.
partial +

El Salvador's homicide rate fell from 52 per 100,000 (2019) to 2.4 per 100,000 (2023) — a 95% reduction — under Bukele's Estado de Excepción security crackdown beginning March 2022

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:el_salvador_bukele_gdp_crime_tradeoff_2019_2024
PARTIAL — mean_gap=-0.5576, |gap|/pre_sd=0.96, p_perm=1 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)
partial +

Estonia adopted among the most radical market-liberalisation packages of any post-Soviet state — flat tax (26% universal rate, 1994), currency board (EEK pegged to DM/EUR, 1992), rapid privatisation, unilateral free t...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:estonia_market_reform_post_soviet_growth_1991_2007
PARTIAL — recovery threshold pass=True (year_recovered=1998, 2007 vs 1991 = 70.53282727739165); Baltic−CIS gap pass=False (gap=5.1509956229348575)
test failed

Canadian real household disposable income per capita has stagnated or grown more slowly than in comparable resource-plus-anglophone-plus-small- open-developed economies (USA, AUS, NZL, GBR, NOR, CHE) over 2015-2023, o...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:canada_real_disposable_income_post_2015
PARTIAL — coef=-0.02236, p=0.451 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Strong employment-protection legislation (EPL) with high union wage-setting coverage and limited at-will dismissal produces a three-order causal chain in Southern European labour markets

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:strong_union_labour_law_youth_unemployment_south_europe
PARTIAL — coef=+2.943, p=0.252 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
supports

Argentina's December 2015 cepo lift produced a discrete official-peso devaluation and higher short-run monthly inflation, while BCRA reserves did not collapse over the next 90 days.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:argentina_cepo_lift_2015_fx_inflation_reserves
SUPPORTED
test failed

Large real effective exchange-rate appreciations mean-revert. In the BIS real broad EER panel, a 15 percent or larger three-year REER appreciation should predict subsequent two-year real depreciation or at least materially weaker REER growth.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bis_reer_appreciation_reversal_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.5, p=0; claim direction not auto-inferred
supports

The 2016 Brexit referendum shock produced a clear near-term UK inflation pass-through and a squeeze in CPI-deflated weekly earnings over the 2016Q2-2017Q4 event window.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:uk_brexit_2016_inflation_real_earnings_window
SUPPORTED
test failed

Countries with stronger market-institution scores in 1960 retain high-income frontier status through 2024 more often than countries with weaker property-rights scores.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:frontier_income_persistence_market_institutions_1960_2024
PARTIAL — coef=-3.379e+05, p=0.261 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
supports

Developmentalist catch-up growth premiums fade after countries reach roughly 40 percent of US GDP per capita; market institutions become the stronger predictor above the threshold.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:catch_up_growth_fades_after_middle_income_threshold
SUPPORTED — coef=+1.288 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0312
refutes

Among OECD and high-income Asian economies, lower product-market regulation and stronger property rights predict higher long-run TFP growth.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:frontier_tfp_market_liberal_panel_1970_2024
REFUTED — coef=-0.06298 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.0331
supports

Estonia's radical market reform (flat tax, currency board, rapid privatisation, free trade) produced stronger 1991-2024 convergence than gradual post-Soviet comparators.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:estonia_market_reform_30yr_income_convergence
supported
supports

Ireland's long-run convergence from below-EU-average to frontier-level GDP per capita is better predicted by trade openness, tax competitiveness, and FDI entry than by classic industrial planning.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ireland_market_opening_fdi_frontier_1987_2024
supported
supports

Property-rights protection predicts 40-year income growth more strongly than state investment share in horse-race regressions.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:property_rights_long_run_income_frontier
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.03081 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0144
test failed

Trade openness predicts long-run GDP-per-capita convergence more strongly than industrial-policy intensity.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:trade_openness_long_run_income_convergence
PARTIAL — coef=+6.729e-18, p=0.00881; effect magnitude effectively zero
test failed

Market reforms should produce prosperity even in weak-institution settings if price signals and property rights are established.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:market_reform_without_state_capacity_failure
PARTIAL — coef=-0.6889, p=0.24 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Countries that transition from state-direction to market competition achieve stronger long-run performance than persistent developmental states.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:developmental_state_to_market_transition_success
REFUTED — coef=-2.412e-08 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.000414
test failed

Industrial policy (sectoral targeting, export subsidies, conditional credit, technology push) succeeds in raising long-run manufacturing productivity and export sophistication when implemented in high-governance state...

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:industrial_policy_high_governance_success
PARTIAL — coef=-0.0009676, p=0.661 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Sweden’s post-1992 crisis market reforms — fiscal consolidation, inflation- targeting adoption, tax and pension overhauls, and product-market deregulation — predict stronger real GDP-per-capita growth during 1995–2024...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:sweden_1990s_market_reform_recovery
refuted
partial +

Countries that undertake unilateral tariff liberalisation — defined as an autonomous, non-FTA-driven reduction in the applied weighted-mean tariff of at least 5 percentage points sustained for at least 5 consecutive y...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:unilateral_tariff_liberalisation_growth_20yr
PARTIAL — mean_gap=+4.317e+05, |gap|/pre_sd=4.9, p_perm=0.4 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)
refutes

Across a broad panel of economies 1980-2020, market reforms (privatisation, trade liberalisation, and price decontrol) produce durable gains in real GDP per capita growth only when rule-of-law scores exceed a minimum ...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:rule_of_law_market_reform_complementarity
REFUTED — coef=-0.1483 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.00481
test failed

Across a broad panel of economies 1980-2020, state allocation of resources — measured by government consumption share, state- enterprise share of output, and public-investment share — has negative long-run effects on ...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:corruption_state_allocation_growth_interaction
PARTIAL — coef=+0.001013, p=0.729 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
test failed

Labour-market flexibility (ease of hiring and firing, low EPL, decentralised wage bargaining) improves long-run employment rates, productivity growth, and GDP per capita only when paired with complementary adjustment ...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:labour_flexibility_security_complement
PARTIAL — coef=+1.306e-16, p=0.339; effect magnitude effectively zero
test failed

Higher government-consumption shares predict weaker TFP growth after controlling for public investment, education, and health spending, across a broad panel of advanced and emerging economies from 1970 to 2020.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:government_consumption_share_tfp
PARTIAL — coef=+0.0001719, p=0.949 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
partial +

Chile’s long-run income convergence is stronger after the combination of market reforms (1975–1990) and democratic institutional repair (1990 onward) than under the earlier state-led import-substitution regime (1950–1...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:chile_market_reform_long_horizon_with_democracy
PARTIAL — mean_gap=+5132, |gap|/pre_sd=15, p_perm=0.417 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)
partial +

New Zealand’s 1984–1993 liberalisation (deregulation, tariff cuts, privatisation, inflation targeting, and fiscal consolidation) improved long-run macroeconomic stability and tradables-sector productivity over 1984–20...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:new_zealand_reform_long_run_productivity_recheck
PARTIAL — mean_gap=-5017, |gap|/pre_sd=6.5, p_perm=0.692 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)
test failed

Australia’s long expansion after the Hawke-Keating reforms (1983–1996) — including tariff cuts, financial deregulation, competition-policy introduction, and fiscal consolidation — is better predicted by market liberal...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:australia_hawke_keating_reform_long_run
PARTIAL — coef=-0.03935, p=0.076 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
test failed

Across countries 1990-2020, faster insolvency and bankruptcy resolution — measured by years to resolve, recovery rate, and strength of insolvency framework index — predicts stronger post- shock productivity recovery t...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bankruptcy_law_efficiency_capital_reallocation
PARTIAL — coef=+0.02111, p=0.113 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
test failed

Across emerging-market and developing economies 1990-2020, stronger contract enforcement — measured by years to resolve a commercial dispute, contract-enforcement index, and legal-origin dummies — predicts whether for...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:contract_enforcement_fdi_productivity_spillovers
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.1145 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0196
supports

Across an unbalanced panel of OECD and emerging-market economies 1980-2020, higher firm-entry rates (new business registrations per 1000 working-age population) predict stronger subsequent 20-year total-factor-product...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:firm_entry_rate_long_run_productivity
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.06104 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0079
refutes

Across middle-income and catch-up economies 1980-2020, high state-directed allocation — measured by state-enterprise share of output, directed-credit intensity, and public-investment-driven growth — is associated with...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:frontier_income_volatility_state_allocation
REFUTED — coef=-0.496 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.000422
partial +

In Maddison long-run country panels, catch-up growth is materially faster below roughly 40 percent of US GDP per capita than above that threshold, but the post-threshold premium is small enough that the developmentali...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:catch_up_growth_fades_after_middle_income_threshold_v2
partial
partial +

In a 1996-2018 Maddison/WGI cross-section, countries with stronger rule of law should show higher mean annual GDP-per-capita growth after controlling for initial income if the property-rights growth channel is strong ...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:property_rights_long_run_income_frontier_v2
partial
test failed

State capacity (proxied by government effectiveness, rule of law, and fiscal extraction) is a prerequisite for effective liberal market policy

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:state_capacity_precedes_liberal_market
partial
supports

Credible fiscal consolidation in mature economies should outperform repeated discretionary stimulus over long horizons by improving private-investment incentives and sovereign-risk credibility.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:fiscal_consolidation_credibility_growth
supported
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, stronger rule-of-law institutions should be associated with higher private and total investment shares through property-rights, contract-enforcement, and economic-calculation channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_rule_of_law_investment_share_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.3477, p=0.814 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, stronger rule-of-law institutions should be associated with deeper private credit intermediation through property-rights, contract-enforcement, and economic-calculation channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_rule_of_law_private_credit_depth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+4.153, p=0.513 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, stronger rule-of-law institutions should be associated with faster real GDP per capita growth through property-rights, contract-enforcement, and economic-calculation channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_rule_of_law_gdp_pc_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.08348, p=0.913 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, stronger rule-of-law institutions should be associated with higher high-technology export intensity through property-rights, contract-enforcement, and economic-calculation channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_rule_of_law_high_tech_exports_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.621, p=0.746 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, more predictable and market-compatible regulation should be associated with higher private and total investment shares through entry, competition, and entrepreneurship channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_regulatory_quality_investment_share_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+1.91 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0782
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, more predictable and market-compatible regulation should be associated with higher employment rates through entry, competition, and entrepreneurship channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_regulatory_quality_employment_rate_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+1.53, p=0.282 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, more predictable and market-compatible regulation should be associated with higher high-technology export intensity through entry, competition, and entrepreneurship channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_regulatory_quality_high_tech_exports_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+2.39, p=0.254 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, more predictable and market-compatible regulation should be associated with faster real GDP per capita growth through entry, competition, and entrepreneurship channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_regulatory_quality_gdp_pc_growth_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+1.017 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0806
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, stronger control of corruption should be associated with higher private and total investment shares through rent-seeking and rule-bound-competition channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_control_corruption_investment_share_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.2542, p=0.831 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, stronger control of corruption should be associated with deeper private credit intermediation through rent-seeking and rule-bound-competition channels.

PARTIAL — coef=-8.876, p=0.258 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, stronger control of corruption should be associated with faster real GDP per capita growth through rent-seeking and rule-bound-competition channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_control_corruption_gdp_pc_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+1.095, p=0.148 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, stronger control of corruption should be associated with higher high-technology export intensity through rent-seeking and rule-bound-competition channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_control_corruption_high_tech_exports_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+1.44, p=0.328 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher broad economic-freedom scores should be associated with higher private and total investment shares through market-order, decentralized-allocation, and policy-predictability channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_economic_freedom_investment_share_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.8498, p=0.37 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher broad economic-freedom scores should be associated with faster real GDP per capita growth through market-order, decentralized-allocation, and policy-predictability channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_economic_freedom_gdp_pc_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.528, p=0.417 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher broad economic-freedom scores should be associated with higher employment rates through market-order, decentralized-allocation, and policy-predictability channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_economic_freedom_employment_rate_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.7284, p=0.498 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher broad economic-freedom scores should be associated with higher high-technology export intensity through market-order, decentralized-allocation, and policy-predictability channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_economic_freedom_high_tech_exports_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.8275, p=0.677 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher inflation should be associated with lower investment shares through sound-money, calculation, and real-contracting channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_sound_money_investment_share_panel
REFUTED — coef=+0.07515 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0356
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher inflation should be associated with slower real GDP per capita growth through sound-money, calculation, and real-contracting channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_sound_money_gdp_pc_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.07696, p=0.103 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher inflation should be associated with shallower private credit intermediation through sound-money, calculation, and real-contracting channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_sound_money_private_credit_depth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.106, p=0.584 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher inflation should be associated with lower employment rates through sound-money, calculation, and real-contracting channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_sound_money_employment_rate_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.04118, p=0.118 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, larger government expenditure shares should be associated with lower investment shares through crowding-out, tax-expectation, and discretionary-allocation channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_government_spending_investment_share_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.2038 (sign matches claim -), p=0.00516
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, larger government expenditure shares should be associated with slower real GDP per capita growth through crowding-out, tax-expectation, and discretionary-allocation channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_government_spending_gdp_pc_growth_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.2569 (sign matches claim -), p=1.52e-09
refutes

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, larger government expenditure shares should be associated with shallower private credit intermediation through crowding-out, tax-expectation, and discretionary-allocation channels.

REFUTED — coef=+1.688 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0121
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, larger government expenditure shares should be associated with lower employment rates through crowding-out, tax-expectation, and discretionary-allocation channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_government_spending_employment_rate_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.1949 (sign matches claim -), p=0.000187
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, larger tax-revenue shares should be associated with lower investment shares through private-incentive, retained-earnings, and deadweight-loss channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_tax_burden_investment_share_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.07954, p=0.726 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, larger tax-revenue shares should be associated with slower real GDP per capita growth through private-incentive, retained-earnings, and deadweight-loss channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_tax_burden_gdp_pc_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.007715, p=0.913 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, larger tax-revenue shares should be associated with shallower private credit intermediation through private-incentive, retained-earnings, and deadweight-loss channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_tax_burden_private_credit_depth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+2.18, p=0.115 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, larger tax-revenue shares should be associated with lower employment rates through private-incentive, retained-earnings, and deadweight-loss channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_tax_burden_employment_rate_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.08592, p=0.535 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher trade openness should be associated with higher private and total investment shares through competition, specialization, and market-size channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_trade_openness_investment_share_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.02048, p=0.355 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher trade openness should be associated with faster real GDP per capita growth through competition, specialization, and market-size channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_trade_openness_gdp_pc_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.005285, p=0.524 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher trade openness should be associated with higher high-technology export intensity through competition, specialization, and market-size channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_trade_openness_high_tech_exports_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.01621, p=0.513 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2023 country panel, higher trade openness should be associated with higher employment rates through competition, specialization, and market-size channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_trade_openness_employment_rate_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.008463, p=0.567 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, more effective rule-bound public administration should be associated with higher private fixed-investment shares through state-capacity, policy-credibility, and contract-enforcement channels.

PARTIAL — coef=+1.875, p=0.407 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, more effective rule-bound public administration should be associated with higher domestic savings shares through state-capacity, policy-credibility, and contract-enforcement channels.

PARTIAL — coef=+1.552, p=0.117 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, more effective rule-bound public administration should be associated with higher manufacturing value-added shares through state-capacity, policy-credibility, and contract-enforcement channels.

PARTIAL — coef=+0.5479, p=0.568 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, more effective rule-bound public administration should be associated with faster real GDP per capita growth through state-capacity, policy-credibility, and contract-enforcement channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_government_effectiveness_gdp_pc_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.7221, p=0.239 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, more open capital accounts should be associated with higher FDI inflows as a share of GDP through capital mobility, allocative-efficiency, and external-discipline channels.

PARTIAL — coef=-1.361, p=0.613 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, more open capital accounts should be associated with higher private fixed-investment shares through capital mobility, allocative-efficiency, and external-discipline channels.

REFUTED — coef=-3.047 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.0989
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, more open capital accounts should be associated with higher high-technology export intensity through capital mobility, allocative-efficiency, and external-discipline channels.

PARTIAL — coef=+2.167, p=0.259 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, more open capital accounts should be associated with faster real GDP per capita growth through capital mobility, allocative-efficiency, and external-discipline channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_capital_account_openness_gdp_pc_growth_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+1.985 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0156
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, stronger fiscal balances should be associated with higher private fixed-investment shares through crowding-out, risk-premium, and fiscal-expectations channels.

SUPPORTED — coef=+0.2315 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0778
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, stronger fiscal balances should be associated with higher domestic savings shares through crowding-out, risk-premium, and fiscal-expectations channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_fiscal_balance_gross_savings_share_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.3266 (sign matches claim +), p=0.00143
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, stronger fiscal balances should be associated with faster real GDP per capita growth through crowding-out, risk-premium, and fiscal-expectations channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_fiscal_balance_gdp_pc_growth_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.1811 (sign matches claim +), p=0.000211
refutes

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, stronger fiscal balances should be associated with deeper private credit intermediation through crowding-out, risk-premium, and fiscal-expectations channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_fiscal_balance_private_credit_depth_panel
REFUTED — coef=-1.028 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.0788
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, larger public-debt shares should be associated with lower private fixed-investment shares through debt-overhang, future-tax-expectation, and sovereign-risk channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_public_debt_private_investment_share_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.1888 (sign matches claim -), p=0.00842
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, larger public-debt shares should be associated with lower domestic savings shares through debt-overhang, future-tax-expectation, and sovereign-risk channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_public_debt_gross_savings_share_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.005145, p=0.831 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, larger public-debt shares should be associated with slower real GDP per capita growth through debt-overhang, future-tax-expectation, and sovereign-risk channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_public_debt_gdp_pc_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.0007575, p=0.919 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, larger public-debt shares should be associated with shallower private credit intermediation through debt-overhang, future-tax-expectation, and sovereign-risk channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_public_debt_private_credit_depth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.2819, p=0.183 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, larger government-consumption shares should be associated with lower private fixed-investment shares through resource-crowding, bureaucratic-consumption, and private-sector displacement channels.

PARTIAL — coef=-0.2076, p=0.217 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, larger government-consumption shares should be associated with lower domestic savings shares through resource-crowding, bureaucratic-consumption, and private-sector displacement channels.

SUPPORTED — coef=-1.112 (sign matches claim -), p=4.06e-07
test failed

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, larger government-consumption shares should be associated with lower manufacturing value-added shares through resource-crowding, bureaucratic-consumption, and private-sector displacement channels.

PARTIAL — coef=-0.2155, p=0.263 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Classical liberal theory predicts that, in a 1996-2021 OECD/market-peer panel, larger government-consumption shares should be associated with slower real GDP per capita growth through resource-crowding, bureaucratic-consumption, and private-sector displacement channels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_order_government_consumption_gdp_pc_growth_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.4447 (sign matches claim -), p=0.000888
supports

Australia's punitive tobacco excise escalation was LESS effective at reducing smoking than comparator countries that adopted harm-reduction alternatives (vaping, snus).

REFUTED — AUS decline 11.3pp < comparator mean 21.07pp (threshold: <20.57pp)
test failed

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Among high-income frontier economies 1980-2020, countries with higher business dynamism — measured by firm-entry rates, job- reallocation rates, and low incumbent-employment share — maintain stronger real income growth per capita than countries with low churn and high incumbent protection. The pre-registered claim is that the top quartile of dynamism shows at least 0.4 percentage points higher annual real income growth than the bottom quartile, after controlling for initial income, education, and sectoral composition.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:business_dynamism_frontier_income_growth
PARTIAL — coef=-1.64e-05, p=0.217 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Technology markets with sustained multi-platform competition show faster quality-adjusted improvement than markets protected by interoperability barriers.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:platform_competition_dissipates_monopoly_rent
REFUTED — coef=+16.11 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0106
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Countries maintaining long-lived food price controls or state procurement show slower agricultural value-added growth than market-priced peers.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:price_controls_food_output_decline_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.4196 (sign matches claim -), p=0.00206
test failed

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Countries moving from administrative spectrum allocation to market auctions show faster mobile and internet diffusion.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:spectrum_auction_vs_administrative_allocation_telecom
PARTIAL — coef=-11.06, p=0.25 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: High public-debt overhang — defined as general government gross debt exceeding 90% of GDP for at least 5 consecutive years — predicts lower private gross fixed capital formation and slower real GDP per capita growth over subsequent 30-year windows, in a broad-country panel 1970-2020. The directional claim is that debt-overhang episodes are followed by cumulative private-investment shortfalls of 10-25% relative to matched non-overhang peers, and by annual growth shortfalls of 0.3-0.7 percentage points, controlling for initial income, institutions, and crisis history.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:debt_overhang_private_investment_30yr
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.08971 (sign matches claim -), p=7.62e-08
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Deeper private-credit market proxies predict stronger productivity growth than state-owned banking allocation.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bank_state_ownership_credit_misallocation
REFUTED — coef=-0.02944 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.000655
test failed

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Deeper private financial-market proxies predict stronger high-technology and innovation diffusion outcomes.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:venture_capital_market_depth_innovation
PARTIAL — coef=-0.02458, p=0.356 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Countries permitting GM crop cultivation without prolonged moratoria experienced faster agricultural yield convergence than ban or delay countries.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:gm_crop_adoption_yield_convergence
REFUTED — coef=+31.57 (sign opposite claim -), p=0
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Higher broad economic freedom predicts faster real GDP per-capita growth.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:cross_school_efw_growth_market_order_1990_2023
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.6849 (sign matches claim +), p=0.073
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Higher broad economic freedom predicts higher private-investment shares.

SUPPORTED — coef=+3.214 (sign matches claim +), p=1.15e-05
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order claim should hold: Rule of law predicts deeper private credit intermediation.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:cross_school_rule_of_law_private_credit_depth_1996_2023
SUPPORTED — coef=+6.888 (sign matches claim +), p=0.00953
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this energy-market claim should hold: Higher renewable-electricity shares predict faster GDP per-capita growth.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:cross_school_renewables_growth_cost_tradeoff_1990_2023
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.02492 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0574
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this institutional-choice claim should hold: countries with stronger market institutions should attract higher net migration after controlling for income and conflict.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:net_migration_revealed_preference_market_institutions
REFUTED — coef=-1.281e+05 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.00405
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this regulatory-efficiency claim should hold: unified national code frameworks and lower regulatory fragmentation should support faster entry and productivity growth.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_entry_uniform_code_productivity
REFUTED — coef=+1.318 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0699
test failed

Classical liberalism predicts this human-capital channel should hold: market-led income growth should be associated with higher female educational attainment across broad country panels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_reform_female_education
PARTIAL — coef=-0.0002614, p=0.277 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this labour-supply channel should hold: higher market-compatible income levels should be associated with stronger physician retention and medical-capacity availability.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:medical_migration_market_opportunity
SUPPORTED — coef=+7.824e-05 (sign matches claim +), p=1.97e-05
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this Hayekian mechanism should hold: increases in regulatory uncertainty should reduce private non-residential investment shares by raising the option value of waiting.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:hayek_regulatory_uncertainty_investment_chilling
REFUTED — coef=-3.98 (sign opposite claim +), p=0
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this competitive-healthcare claim should hold: clear generic-substitution rules should reduce pharmaceutical spending without worsening population health baselines.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:generic_substitution_mandate_savings_no_harm
REFUTED — coef=+811.4 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.00685
test failed

Classical liberalism predicts this rules-and-predictability claim should hold: more stable, rules-based regulatory settings should be associated with higher private investment shares.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:regulatory_predictability_cross_sector_investment
PARTIAL — coef=+1.79, p=0.18 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this market-order consumption claim should hold: stronger market-compatible regulatory quality should be associated with higher real household consumption per person.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:market_freedom_consumption_pc_1970_2024
SUPPORTED — coef=+2050 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0212
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this open-trade frontier claim should hold: Singapore's post-2014 FTA cascade should sustain very high trade openness and maintain a growth premium versus high-income regional peers.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:sea_singapore_fta_cascade_post_2014
REFUTED — coef=-1.46 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.00114
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this export-led growth claim should hold: Bangladesh's apparel export model should raise manufacturing share and outperform Pakistan on GDP-per-capita growth.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:asia_bangladesh_apparel_growth_1985_2024
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.7082 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0127
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this long-run fiat-money claim should hold: post-1971 fiat currencies lose purchasing power against hard-asset benchmarks over multi-decade horizons.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:fiat_expansion_erodes_currency_purchasing_power_long_run
SUPPORTED — 7/7 fiat currencies lost purchasing power against at least one hard-asset benchmark
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this India trade-liberalisation claim should hold: the 1991 tariff-cut reform should produce a visible structural increase in trade openness.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:trade_lib_india_1991_tariff_cut_export_response
SUPPORTED — trade openness rose +14.7pp, clearing the +10pp gate
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this Chile open-regionalism claim should hold: the bilateral FTA cascade should raise trade openness by more than Latin American comparators.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:trade_lib_chile_bilateral_fta_cascade
REFUTED — CHL openness rose +7.3pp but comparator differential moved -9.0pp
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this Indonesia unilateral-liberalisation claim should hold: the 1985-1995 reform wave should produce a clear pre-crisis trade-openness break.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:trade_lib_indonesia_1980s_1990s_unilateral
REFUTED — trade openness rose only +1.9pp, below the +5pp refutation gate
refutes

Classical liberalism predicts this Mexico-EU FTA claim should hold: the 2000 agreement should produce a detectable trade-openness gain relative to Latin American comparators.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:trade_lib_mexico_eu_fta_2000
REFUTED — MEX openness change lagged comparators by 6.1pp
test failed

Classical liberalism predicts this entrepreneurship claim should hold: higher startup density should predict faster frontier prosperity and productivity growth.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:startup_density_frontier_prosperity
PARTIAL — coef=-6.218e-06, p=0.386 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberalism predicts this youth labour-market claim should hold: higher minimum-wage bite ratios should be associated with higher youth unemployment in broad panels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:minimum_wage_youth_unemployment_tradeoff
PARTIAL — coef=-0.0919, p=0.331 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberalism predicts this agricultural market-access claim should hold: export openness should help agricultural economies diversify into higher-value crops over time.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:export_openness_agricultural_diversification
PARTIAL — coef=-2.498, p=0.691 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Classical liberalism predicts this rule-of-law entrepreneurship claim should hold: formal business entry should predict stronger subsequent growth where legal institutions let new firms operate productively rather than defensively.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:wdi_business_entry_rule_of_law_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+4.981e-16, p=0.583; effect magnitude effectively zero
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this Bangladesh market-access claim should hold: preferential access and quota removal should let a low-income exporter convert apparel market access into manufacturing-share gains versus close comparators.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:trade_lib_bangladesh_apparel_eu_eba_2008
SUPPORTED - BGD manufacturing share rose +5.62pp and beat PAK by +3.42pp
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this managed-regional industrialisation claim should hold in the negative direction: a customs-bloc arrangement like Mercosur should not by itself create durable industrial deepening absent broader market and institutional conditions.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:trade_lib_argentina_mercosur_industrial_effect
SUPPORTED — ARG manufacturing-share change differed from comparators by only +1.6pp
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this free-zone institutions claim should hold: legal autonomy, commercial courts, and rule-bound business zones should produce visibly stronger regulatory and market-institution scores than resource-rent peers.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:uae_freezone_institutional_quality_wgi_1996_2024
SUPPORTED - 3 of 4 metrics met threshold (support threshold 3)
supports

Classical liberalism predicts this capital-gains-tax claim should hold: lower statutory capital-gains tax rates should be associated with stronger real investment and business formation after standard macro and institutional controls.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:capital_gains_tax_cut_investment_response_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.1981 (sign matches claim -), p=0.00535
test failed

Public electrification complements private-sector growth when regulatory quality is high; in low-regulatory-quality states, electricity access expansions show weaker links to manufacturing value added and business entry.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_electricity_access_regulatory_quality
SUPPORTED — coef=-1.191 (sign matches claim -), p=0.00985
test failed

Energy-shock relief works better as targeted transfers or temporary tax smoothing in high-capacity states; administered price controls/subsidies predict shortages, fiscal slippage, or lower investment where pass-throu...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_energy_shock_transfers_vs_price_controls
PARTIAL — coef=+7.745e-11, p=0.229 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Green industrial policy complements markets when it lowers renewable costs or deployment without raising industrial electricity prices; where grid integration capacity is weak, higher renewable shares predict manufact...

PARTIAL — coef=-0.00237, p=0.877 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher industrial electricity prices predict lower manufacturing value-added share and weaker industrial production growth.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:eurostat_industrial_power_price_manufacturing_share_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.2893, p=0.326 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Agricultural output growth achieved through forest-cover loss has weaker poverty-reduction returns and worse emissions outcomes than output growth without forest loss.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:forest_loss_agricultural_growth_tradeoff_panel
REFUTED — coef=+0.0882 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.000928
supports

Fossil-fuel subsidy reductions lower emissions intensity only when paired with household compensation; otherwise they raise poverty or energy stress enough to weaken the just-transition claim.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:fossil_subsidy_phaseout_emissions_poverty_tradeoff_panel
REFUTED — coef=+0.0882 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.000928
test failed

In high-income countries, material footprint per capita can fall while life expectancy and life satisfaction are maintained or improved; refuted if footprint reductions systematically require welfare losses outside re...

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:material_footprint_wellbeing_decoupling_high_income_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.2342, p=0.313 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

carbon pricing achieves emissions reductions at lower output and household-cost penalties per ton abated than technology-specific mandates of similar ambition.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_carbon_pricing_command_control_cost_per_ton
REFUTED — coef=+1 (sign opposite claim -), p=0
test failed

sustained household fuel or electricity price controls predict higher shortage frequency, larger fiscal subsidy burdens, and lower energy-sector investment.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_energy_price_controls_shortage_fiscal_burden
PARTIAL — coef=-1.507e-11, p=0.134 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

fuel-subsidy reforms paired with targeted transfers produce stronger 5- to 15-year fiscal balances and social spending durability than unreformed universal subsidies.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_fuel_subsidy_reform_targeted_transfer_qol
SUPPORTED — coef=+2.769e-11 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0377
test failed

network-sector unbundling combined with independent regulation predicts lower prices and better service quality than vertically integrated state or protected monopoly models.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_network_unbundling_price_quality_telecom_energy
PARTIAL — coef=+2.116, p=0.822 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher nuclear electricity share predicts lower industrial power-price volatility and lower fossil electricity share.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:nuclear_share_power_price_volatility_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.001155, p=0.167 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher fossil-fuel consumption subsidies predict higher energy intensity and slower renewable-share growth.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:owid_fossil_subsidy_energy_intensity_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-2.382e-09, p=0.886 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Expanding protected land lowers land-use emissions or forest loss without reducing food production per capita in countries with adequate yield growth.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:protected_land_food_security_emissions_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.02435, p=0.141 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Public investment crowds in renewable capacity and private investment during slack periods, but is refuted if higher public investment systematically displaces private capital without capacity gains.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:public_investment_green_capacity_crowding_in_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.04515, p=0.58 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Renewable-capacity growth increases net employment or prevents industrial-employment loss in regions with transition policy, while the claim is refuted if capacity growth coincides with persistent employment losses.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:renewable_capacity_employment_transition_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.02398, p=0.254 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Rapid renewable electricity-share growth raises electricity prices in the short run unless fossil or nuclear backup volatility falls.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:renewable_share_electricity_price_transition_cost_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.0009708 (sign matches claim -), p=0.0734
test failed

Lower annual hours worked reduce energy use and emissions per capita without proportionate reductions in life satisfaction or employment.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:working_time_reduction_energy_use_per_capita_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-9.948e-05, p=0.738 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Fiscal consolidation within three years after recessions lowers employment and potential-output paths relative to countries that delay consolidation until recovery.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:austerity_after_recession_hysteresis_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.01692, p=0.541 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Larger automatic stabilizers reduce peak-to-trough GDP losses and poverty spikes during recessions, but may trade off against recovery speed if labor-market reentry is weak.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:automatic_stabilizers_recession_depth_recovery_panel
REFUTED — coef=+0.361 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.000899
test failed

Public investment raises infrastructure and growth outcomes only where corruption control is high; where corruption control is low, higher public investment predicts debt accumulation without road, electricity, or gro...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_corruption_public_investment_leakage
PARTIAL — coef=-0.1183, p=0.914 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Education spending raises human capital and later productivity only where governance quality and teacher/system capacity are high; spending alone is weakly related to outcomes in low-capacity systems.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_education_spending_learning_threshold
PARTIAL — coef=-0.008788, p=0.107 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Discretionary fiscal expansion raises real output with limited inflation when unemployment is above its country-specific 10-year mean, but the output gain shrinks and inflation pass-through rises when unemployment is ...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_fiscal_expansion_slack_inflation_tradeoff
REFUTED — coef=-0.205 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.000388
test failed

During the 2008-2012 crisis, faster fiscal stimulus in high-capacity states predicted smaller employment losses and faster GDP recovery; in low-capacity/high-debt states, stimulus size had weaker recovery payoff and w...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_gfc_stimulus_speed_output_recovery
REFUTED — coef=-0.205 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.000388
test failed

Government size only drags growth when the marginal increase is government consumption or wage-bill heavy; public investment-heavy expansions in high-capacity states have neutral or positive five-year productivity eff...

PARTIAL — coef=+0.04439, p=0.659 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Government spending has a nonmonotonic relationship with growth: moderate-to-large spending is compatible with growth in high-effectiveness states, while similarly large spending in low-effectiveness states predicts l...

PARTIAL — coef=+0.04439, p=0.659 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Public health spending reduces mortality and raises life expectancy when corruption control is high; low corruption-control states show weaker health outcome gains per spending point.

PARTIAL — coef=+0.9991, p=0.129 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Industrial-policy intensity proxies such as R&D spending or high-tech export targeting predict durable high-tech export shares only above a government-effectiveness threshold; below it, the same policy intensity predi...

PARTIAL — coef=+2.96, p=0.475 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Public investment complements private investment and productivity only in high-execution states; in low government-effectiveness states, higher public capital formation predicts weaker private investment shares and no...

SUPPORTED — coef=+0.08826 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0052
test failed

R&D spending converts into patenting and productivity only when private finance and regulatory quality are adequate; otherwise R&D intensity is weakly associated with innovation outcomes.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_rnd_spending_finance_patent_productivity
PARTIAL — coef=+7.645e+04, p=0.177 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

In OECD recessions from 1980-2024, larger automatic stabilizers cushion two-year GDP and employment losses only where government effectiveness is above the sample median; where effectiveness is low, the same spending ...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_stabilizers_output_loss_threshold_oecd
REFUTED — coef=+5e-07 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0263
test failed

Social spending reduces poverty more strongly when tax administration and corruption control are high; in weak-capacity states, spending growth has lower poverty elasticity and higher fiscal slippage.

SUPPORTED — coef=-1.106e-06 (sign matches claim -), p=0.0263
test failed

Higher tax revenue supports growth and poverty reduction when tax collection capacity and rule of law are high; above similar revenue shares in low-capacity states, marginal revenue predicts lower private investment a...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_tax_revenue_public_goods_threshold
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.3608 (sign matches claim -), p=0.00366
test failed

Lower out-of-pocket health-spending shares predict lower avoidable mortality and less medical impoverishment after total health spending is controlled; refuted if decommodification has no independent outcome gain.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:decommodified_health_oop_spending_mortality_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.9991, p=0.129 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Government deficits are associated with higher private-sector net saving, especially when current-account balances are stable; the claim is refuted if private saving does not co-move after accounting identities and va...

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:deficits_private_saving_sectoral_balance_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.5616 (sign matches claim +), p=0
refutes

Public education spending reduces inequality or improves intergenerational mobility only when housing-cost burden is low.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:education_spending_inequality_mobility_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.5887 (sign matches claim -), p=0.0211
test failed

Higher public education spending predicts higher secondary and tertiary attainment among lower-income cohorts and lower intergenerational earnings persistence; a null or regressive attainment effect would refute the e...

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:education_spending_low_income_attainment_mobility_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+1.333, p=0.243 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Higher interest expenditure shares predict lower public investment or education/health spending in EU country-years outside monetary-sovereign conditions.

SUPPORTED — coef=-0.05732 (sign matches claim -), p=1.88e-05
test failed

Fiscal tightening predicts weaker next-year GDP growth when real interest rates are low or output gaps are negative, but not when inflation is high.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:fiscal_balance_real_rate_growth_interaction_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.04276, p=0.68 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Fiscal expansions during high-slack years reduce unemployment and accelerate GDP recovery more than expansions near capacity, with no persistent inflation overshoot unless supply constraints bind.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:fiscal_expansion_slack_unemployment_recovery_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.6776, p=0.189 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

R&D spending has larger high-tech export returns in countries with higher government effectiveness and rule of law.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:governance_rnd_hightech_return_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+4.132 (sign matches claim +), p=0.00287
refutes

Higher government consumption share predicts lower private investment share, especially when debt-service burden is high.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:government_consumption_private_investment_drag_panel
REFUTED — coef=+188.6 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0677
test failed

Higher health-spending shares improve mortality outcomes without reducing medium-run GDP-per-capita growth unless financed through high debt-service burdens.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:health_spending_growth_tradeoff_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.0652, p=0.677 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

higher central-bank independence predicts lower inflation volatility and stronger real wage growth over 15- to 30-year windows after controlling for fiscal dominance.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_central_bank_independence_inflation_real_wage_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-5.219 (sign matches claim -), p=1.03e-05
supports

revenue-neutral tax shifts from income taxation toward broad consumption taxation predict higher household saving and private investment, without systematically weaker lower-decile consumption growth when transfers ar...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_consumption_tax_shift_savings_investment_longrun
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.214 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0941
test failed

lower effective marginal tax rates on new investment predict faster capital deepening and manufacturing productivity growth than sector-specific investment credits.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_corporate_tax_neutrality_capital_deepening_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.04937, p=0.608 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

expenditure rules that cap current spending while preserving public investment predict higher private investment and lower fiscal volatility than untargeted deficit rules.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_expenditure_cap_public_investment_crowd_in
PARTIAL — coef=+0.8045, p=0.12 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

binding fiscal rules with transparent escape clauses predict lower debt-service burdens and faster post-shock recovery than discretionary fiscal regimes at similar initial debt levels.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_fiscal_rule_debt_service_growth_resilience
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.2236 (sign matches claim -), p=1.37e-08
refutes

countries that shift toward broader tax bases and lower statutory marginal rates achieve higher 10- to 25-year private investment growth without lower total revenue ratios than comparable countries relying on narrow b...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_tax_broad_base_low_rate_investment_growth_1980_2024
REFUTED — coef=+0.214 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0941
test failed

Higher public education spending as a share of GDP predicts later human-capital gains only where governance quality is above the sample median.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:oecd_education_spending_human_capital_gain_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.4533, p=0.226 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher housing-cost burdens are associated with higher after-tax inequality even after market-income inequality is controlled.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:oecd_housing_cost_inequality_after_tax_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.03495, p=0.691 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Social spending reduces poverty more effectively when active labour programmes and family benefits make up a larger spending share.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:oecd_socx_poverty_reduction_per_spending_point_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-1.165e-06 (sign matches claim -), p=0.0156
refutes

Increases in top marginal income-tax rates lower top-income concentration without reducing medium-run GDP per capita growth or private investment more than matched lower-tax countries.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:progressive_tax_top_income_share_and_growth_oecd
REFUTED — coef=+0.04831 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0187
test failed

Higher public health spending reduces amenable mortality, infant mortality, and out-of-pocket burden after income and population-age controls; the claim is refuted if spending growth does not improve outcomes or only ...

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:public_health_spending_avoidable_mortality_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.9991, p=0.129 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Countries with higher pre-2020 public health spending shares had smaller 2019-2022 life-expectancy losses, conditional on age structure and income.

PARTIAL — coef=-0.1413, p=0.141 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

More generous public pensions lower elderly poverty and material deprivation, and the claim is weakened if gains are accompanied by persistent working-age tax wedges, debt-service stress, or lower employment.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:public_pension_generosity_elderly_poverty_fiscal_tradeoff
PARTIAL — coef=+0.07651, p=0.576 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Larger tax-and-transfer redistribution gaps predict faster bottom-40 real disposable-income growth over the next three years without a GDP-per-capita growth penalty larger than 0.3 percentage points per year.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:redistribution_gap_bottom40_real_income_growth_oecd
REFUTED — coef=-0.1741 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.0675
test failed

R&D spending intensity predicts higher patent intensity only where government effectiveness or rule of law is high.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:rnd_spending_patent_intensity_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+7.645e+04, p=0.177 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher social spending reduces market-income poverty more strongly where benefits are more cash-and-service universal, and the claim is weakened if poverty falls only through accounting transfers with no improvement i...

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:social_spending_market_poverty_reduction_elasticity_oecd
PARTIAL — coef=+0.002469, p=0.947 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Higher tax revenue predicts faster growth only when it is associated with higher public investment or government effectiveness.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:tax_revenue_public_investment_growth_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.214 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0941
test failed

Health expenditure per capita increases life expectancy strongly at low and middle spending levels but has sharply diminishing returns above the OECD median.

PARTIAL — coef=+0.1233, p=0.198 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher out-of-pocket health spending shares predict higher infant, under-5, or amenable mortality at a given income level.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:wdi_out_of_pocket_health_spending_mortality_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.9991, p=0.129 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Growth in food or crop production per rural worker predicts lower poverty rates and child mortality in low- and middle-income countries.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:agricultural_productivity_poverty_reduction_panel
REFUTED — coef=+1.109 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0102
test failed

Declines in agricultural employment share predict faster GDP-per-capita growth only when manufacturing or services productivity rises at the same time.

PARTIAL — coef=+0.01268, p=0.709 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Broadband infrastructure improves business entry, productivity, and export services when telecom competition and regulatory quality are high; monopoly rollout without competition shows weaker diffusion benefits.

REFUTED — coef=-0.04444 (sign opposite claim +), p=3.75e-05
test failed

Transport infrastructure raises regional productivity and employment where procurement quality and maintenance capacity are high; low-capacity buildouts show weaker productivity gains and higher debt per road-km impro...

PARTIAL — coef=+1.382e-06, p=0.422 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

More restrictive capital-account regimes reduce crisis incidence and exchange-rate volatility without lowering long-run investment or GDP growth in emerging markets.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:capital_controls_crisis_volatility_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.8045, p=0.12 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

deeper private capital markets predict faster reallocation of capital toward high-productivity firms and stronger aggregate TFP growth than bank-dominated systems with politically concentrated credit.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_capital_market_depth_reallocation_productivity
REFUTED — coef=-0.001081 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.00922
supports

directed-credit intensity predicts lower marginal product of capital and slower total factor productivity growth than market-priced credit allocation.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_directed_credit_capital_misallocation_growth_drag
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.001081 (sign matches claim -), p=0.00922
refutes

moderate-to-strong IP protection predicts higher quality-adjusted innovation and technology diffusion, but extremely restrictive follow-on rules reduce downstream innovation.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_ip_protection_moderate_strength_innovation_diffusion
REFUTED — coef=-3.087e-07 (sign opposite claim +), p=1.68e-11
test failed

stable rule-bound regulation predicts higher private investment and lower investment volatility than discretionary licensing or case-by-case industrial policy.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_rule_bound_regulation_investment_volatility
PARTIAL — coef=+0.8045, p=0.12 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Higher ICT-sector value-added or productivity growth predicts faster aggregate GDP-per-hour growth.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:oecd_ict_sector_productivity_spillover_panel
REFUTED — coef=-0.04444 (sign opposite claim +), p=3.75e-05
test failed

Human-capital growth predicts TFP growth more strongly than capital-deepening alone over 5-year windows.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:pwt_human_capital_tfp_growth_panel
REFUTED — coef=-0.2534 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.0341
supports

Growth in resident patent applications predicts TFP growth over the next 3-5 years more strongly than non-resident patenting.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:wipo_resident_patenting_tfp_followthrough_panel
REFUTED — coef=-3.087e-07 (sign opposite claim +), p=1.68e-11
test failed

Universal or broad health coverage improves health outcomes without reducing employment when financed through broad-based taxes or social insurance and managed by high-capacity institutions; payroll-heavy financing wi...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_health_insurance_labour_market_complement
PARTIAL — coef=-0.1024, p=0.236 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Urban infrastructure investment lowers mortality and supports urban productivity only when municipal/state capacity is high; rapid urbanization without service delivery predicts worse health and weaker productivity.

SUPPORTED — coef=-0.865 (sign matches claim -), p=1.55e-15
supports

Energy use per capita has a strong positive association with life expectancy below a threshold but little additional association above high-income levels.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:energy_use_life_expectancy_saturation_threshold_panel
REFUTED — coef=-0.0001605 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.0691
test failed

countries implementing durable packages of trade openness, monetary stability, property-rights improvement, and entry liberalization show stronger 15- to 30-year gains in median consumption, life expectancy, and human...

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_market_reform_package_qol_long_horizon_synth
PARTIAL — coef=-0.005766, p=0.131 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher physician density predicts lower amenable mortality, with larger effects where public coverage or public health spending is higher.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:oecd_physician_density_amenable_mortality_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+814.4, p=0.282 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Credit-gap booms combined with house-price booms predict higher unemployment 2-4 years later.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bis_credit_gap_house_price_unemployment_lag_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.007118, p=0.404 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Real residential property-price growth above income growth predicts weaker private consumption growth over the next 2 years.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bis_house_price_growth_consumption_squeeze_panel
REFUTED — coef=+37.71 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0335
test failed

Credit booms turn into damaging house-price cycles primarily where housing supply and permitting capacity are constrained; elastic-supply markets show smaller price booms and smaller post-boom employment losses.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_housing_supply_credit_boom_amplifier
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.2024 (sign matches claim +), p=0.00869
refutes

EU countries with faster construction value-added or construction employment growth experience lower subsequent housing-cost overburden.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:eurostat_construction_supply_housing_cost_relief_panel
REFUTED — coef=+0.0006784 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0377
test failed

OECD country-years with higher housing-cost overburden rates have lower real private-consumption-per-capita growth over the next 1-3 years, after income, unemployment, and country/year effects.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:oecd_housing_cost_overburden_consumption_drag_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.2649, p=0.517 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Rising low-income rent burden predicts higher child poverty or disposable-income poverty, net of unemployment and GDP per capita.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:oecd_rent_burden_child_poverty_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.3983, p=0.233 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Capital-market depth raises patenting and high-growth entry when rule of law and disclosure quality are high; in weak-institution settings, market depth predicts volatility and crisis exposure more than innovation.

PARTIAL — coef=+466, p=0.216 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Regulation complements markets when regulatory quality is high: higher regulatory quality predicts more business entry and less informality; high procedural burden with low regulatory quality predicts lower entry and ...

PARTIAL — coef=-1.057e+04, p=0.352 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

faster and more predictable contract enforcement predicts larger average firm scale, lower working-capital constraints, and higher labor productivity.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_contract_enforcement_firm_scale_productivity
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.1179 (sign matches claim +), p=0.00344
test failed

higher formal business-entry barriers predict larger informal sectors and lower small-firm productivity growth over long windows.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_entry_barriers_informality_small_firm_productivity
PARTIAL — coef=+1510, p=0.698 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

improvements in expropriation-risk and property-rights indicators predict higher private investment and longer project maturities, especially in capital-intensive sectors.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_expropriation_risk_private_investment_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.8045, p=0.12 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher collective-bargaining coverage lowers in-work poverty and low-wage incidence with no youth-employment penalty in coordinated systems, but is refuted if coverage mainly prices out young or low-skill workers.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:bargaining_coverage_low_wage_poverty_employment_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.03644, p=0.104 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Active labour-market spending reduces long-term unemployment only where case-management capacity and benefit conditionality are strong; passive benefit generosity without activation predicts longer unemployment duration.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_activation_spending_unemployment_duration
REFUTED — coef=+1.109 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0201
test failed

Public childcare and family benefits raise female labour-force participation and fertility only when housing costs and childcare supply constraints are not binding; high transfers without supply expansion have weaker ...

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_childcare_spending_female_lfp_housing_cost
PARTIAL — coef=+1.237, p=0.427 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

In-work benefits increase low-income employment when phaseout cliffs are smooth and administration is simple; sharp cliffs or complex means tests predict lower hours growth and weaker reemployment.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_in_work_benefits_cliff_employment
REFUTED — coef=-0.7535 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.0421
test failed

More generous unemployment benefits do not lower employment when activation spending and case-management capacity are high; without activation, generosity predicts longer unemployment duration and lower employment rates.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_unemployment_benefits_activation_threshold
SUPPORTED — coef=-1.852 (sign matches claim -), p=5.9e-06
test failed

Childcare and family-benefit expansions raise female labor-force participation and fertility without lowering maternal employment; refuted if cash-only benefits reduce employment or fail to move fertility.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:child_family_benefits_female_lfp_fertility_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.02921, p=0.924 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Employment protection improves job security and tenure without creating youth/temporary-contract dualism only when active labor policy and growth are strong.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:epl_security_youth_unemployment_dualism_panel
REFUTED — coef=-2.84 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.00136
supports

Higher private-credit depth and financial-sector value-added shares predict lower labor shares and weaker real investment after credit booms, supporting financialization critiques if robust.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:financialization_labor_share_investment_panel
REFUTED — coef=+0.01019 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0583
test failed

Faster services-sector expansion predicts higher female labour-force participation, net of education and income.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ilostat_services_growth_female_lfp_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.01268, p=0.709 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Public employment or activation-heavy labor-market programs lower long-term unemployment and poverty more than passive transfers at similar fiscal cost.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:job_guarantee_almp_unemployment_floor_panel
REFUTED — coef=+1.109 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0201
supports

In demand-constrained high-income economies, rising labor share predicts stronger consumption and GDP growth, while profit-share gains predict weaker domestic demand.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:labor_share_demand_growth_wage_led_panel
REFUTED — coef=+0.01019 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0583
test failed

Moderate minimum-wage bite increases low-end wages and reduces working poverty with employment effects near zero; refuted if high-bite settings show significant low-skill job losses.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:minimum_wage_bite_low_pay_poverty_employment_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.0284, p=0.386 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

stricter employment protection legislation predicts higher youth unemployment and longer unemployment duration after demand shocks, with smaller effects where apprenticeships and temporary contracts are flexible.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_employment_protection_youth_unemployment_duration
PARTIAL — coef=-0.3388, p=0.19 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

high minimum-wage bite raises wages for covered incumbents but predicts weaker youth employment and higher informal employment in low-productivity regions.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_minimum_wage_bite_youth_informality_tradeoff
PARTIAL — coef=+0.0547, p=0.282 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

lower entry barriers in childcare, retail, transport, and personal services predict higher female labor-force participation through lower household-service prices and more flexible jobs.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_service_sector_entry_female_lfp_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+2.918, p=0.363 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

higher labor tax wedges predict lower prime-age employment and higher informality over long windows, with larger effects in middle-income economies.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_tax_wedge_labor_participation_formality_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.01506, p=0.833 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Active labour-market spending predicts faster unemployment declines after unemployment shocks than passive cash-support spending.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:oecd_almp_spending_unemployment_recovery_panel
REFUTED — coef=+1.109 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0201
refutes

Stricter employment protection legislation predicts higher youth unemployment, especially when GDP growth is weak.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:oecd_epl_youth_unemployment_panel
REFUTED — coef=-2.84 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.00136
test failed

Higher minimum-wage bite predicts higher low-education unemployment when productivity growth is below the OECD median.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:oecd_minimum_wage_bite_low_education_unemployment_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.0547, p=0.282 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher union density lowers wage dispersion but may reduce employment only where productivity growth is weak.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:oecd_union_density_wage_dispersion_employment_tradeoff
PARTIAL — coef=-0.0105, p=0.663 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Larger vocational or work-based upper-secondary pathways predict lower youth unemployment without reducing tertiary progression.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:oecd_vocational_track_youth_unemployment_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.5812, p=0.14 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Monetary tightening reduces labor share and wage growth more than profit income during disinflation episodes, implying a distributional cost channel.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:policy_rate_hikes_labor_share_distribution_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.000878, p=0.372 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Reductions in annual hours worked raise hourly productivity and wellbeing without lowering employment rates when implemented in high-productivity economies.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:shorter_hours_productivity_employment_wellbeing_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.345, p=0.342 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

More generous unemployment benefits reduce household-income losses and recession depth, but the strongest claim is refuted if they materially lengthen unemployment duration after controlling for labor-demand shocks an...

REFUTED — coef=+2.441 (sign opposite claim -), p=1.54e-08
test failed

Higher union density raises labor share and lowers disposable-income inequality without reducing medium-run GDP per hour growth once sector composition is controlled.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:union_density_labor_share_inequality_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.0005947, p=0.39 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Higher household debt-service ratios predict slower real private-consumption growth especially after policy-rate increases.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bis_household_dsr_policy_rate_consumption_slowdown_panel
REFUTED — coef=+188.6 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0677
supports

Periods of policy rates below inflation/GDP-growth fundamentals predict later credit-gap and house-price expansions.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bis_low_policy_rate_credit_gap_asset_cycle_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.02768 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0415
test failed

Higher pre-crisis bank capital buffers reduce crisis output losses without permanently lowering credit growth in high-supervision states; in weak-supervision states, nominal capital ratios do not prevent credit busts.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_bank_capital_buffers_credit_cycle_cost
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.03393 (sign matches claim -), p=4.25e-07
test failed

Financial depth supports productivity and innovation only under strong rule of law; in weak-rule-of-law settings, private credit growth predicts credit booms and asset prices more than TFP or patenting.

REFUTED — coef=-0.001081 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.00922
refutes

Large central-bank government-bond purchases lower long yields without producing proportional CPI inflation when unemployment is above pre-crisis levels.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:central_bank_asset_purchases_yields_inflation_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.2653 (sign matches claim +), p=1.7e-07
supports

US M2 or central-bank balance-sheet expansions predict asset-price inflation more strongly than CPI inflation over post-1990 windows.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:fred_m2_asset_price_cpi_divergence_us_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.2653 (sign matches claim +), p=1.7e-07
test failed

credit booms occurring under subsidized or politically directed credit regimes produce deeper post-boom output losses than credit booms under market-priced credit.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_credit_boom_price_signal_bust_severity
PARTIAL — coef=-0.007118, p=0.404 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

negative real deposit rates created by interest-rate caps or high inflation reduce private saving and lower long-run domestic investment quality.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_financial_repression_savings_real_rate_investment
SUPPORTED — coef=-3.117 (sign matches claim -), p=0.0178
refutes

sustained excess broad-money growth over real output growth predicts higher medium-run inflation across regimes, with weaker coefficients only where credible nominal anchors are present.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_money_growth_nominal_anchor_inflation_1960_2024
REFUTED — coef=+0.2653 (sign opposite claim -), p=1.7e-07
refutes

For monetary sovereigns with floating exchange rates and debt in domestic currency, high public-debt ratios do not predict inflation or default absent real-resource or external-balance stress.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:sovereign_currency_debt_inflation_threshold_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.08413 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0243
test failed

Real effective exchange-rate appreciation predicts lower export product variety and weaker goods-export growth over the next 2 years.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:bis_reer_appreciation_export_variety_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.009664, p=0.22 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Infant-industry protection works when tariffs are temporary and followed by export-share gains; persistent tariffs without export discipline predict lower consumption growth and no high-tech export upgrading.

School predicts:mixed·Hypothesis:capacity_tariff_sunset_infant_industry_upgrade
PARTIAL — coef=+6.429, p=0.375 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Tariff reductions increase consumption and export variety in high-rule-of-law and high-human-capital countries, but generate weak or negative medium-run growth in low-capacity countries with shallow finance.

PARTIAL — coef=+6.429, p=0.375 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Countries with both higher domestic food-production growth and higher food-trade openness have smaller food-price and poverty spikes after global commodity-price shocks.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:food_production_trade_openness_resilience_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+0.5882, p=0.107 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

High-tech export shares generate stronger GDP and TFP growth when export concentration is low.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:hightech_exports_product_concentration_growth_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+2.96, p=0.475 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
refutes

Mission-oriented industrial policy raises high-tech export shares and resident patenting after five to ten years, with support only if gains exceed general R&D and education trends.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:industrial_policy_hightech_exports_patents_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=+4.132 (sign matches claim +), p=0.00287
refutes

customs simplification and shorter border delays predict lower trade costs and faster small-exporter growth than tariff cuts alone.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_customs_simplification_trade_cost_growth
REFUTED — coef=+0.007985 (sign opposite claim -), p=0.0246
test failed

tighter FDI restrictions predict slower adoption of foreign technology and weaker productivity convergence in tradable sectors.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_fdi_restriction_technology_diffusion_slowdown
PARTIAL — coef=+40.54, p=0.425 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

durable tariff reductions predict lower tradable-goods prices and higher real household consumption, especially for lower-income households with high tradable basket shares.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:ml_tariff_reduction_consumer_real_income_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+6.429, p=0.375 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Higher trade openness raises short-run unemployment volatility but lowers average unemployment in flexible or high-capacity labour markets.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:trade_openness_unemployment_volatility_panel
SUPPORTED — coef=-0.01245 (sign matches claim -), p=0.0636
test failed

Tertiary attainment growth predicts higher high-tech export shares after 3-5 years, conditional on income and trade openness.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:wdi_tertiary_attainment_hightech_exports_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.03328, p=0.286 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

More diversified export baskets predict smaller export and GDP contractions during global downturns.

PARTIAL — coef=-2.009, p=0.128 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Higher food import tariffs predict higher food-price inflation and worse poverty outcomes, especially in food-import-dependent countries.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:wits_food_tariffs_food_price_inflation_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-0.01183, p=0.17 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
test failed

Tariff reductions predict greater import product variety and higher private consumption per capita over 3-year windows.

School predicts:supported·Hypothesis:wits_tariff_cuts_import_variety_consumption_panel
PARTIAL — coef=+6.429, p=0.375 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
supports

Higher tariff protection does not predict later high-tech export upgrading unless governance quality is high.

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:wits_tariff_protection_manufacturing_upgrade_panel
REFUTED — coef=-0.1587 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.000139
test failed

Output or energy-use contractions do not have to reduce basic-needs outcomes when health, education, and food-security institutions are protected; refuted if contractions reliably worsen mortality, schooling, or pover...

School predicts:falsified·Hypothesis:degrowth_recession_basic_needs_protection_panel
PARTIAL — coef=-2.29, p=0.308 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive

Inferred evidence — hypotheses testing this school's axes

Ranked by axis-overlap score. These are hypotheses already in the library whose tests speak to the axes this school's predictions live on, regardless of whether the school explicitly cited them.

Singapore's long-run prosperity and frontier convergence are better predicted by extreme trade openness, strong rule of law, competitive product and services markets, and high economic freedom than by state ownership or industrial targeting alone.
singapore_state_capacity_market_openness_combo
regulatory.trade_opennessinstitutional.rule_of_lawinstitutional.property_rights
partial
Rapid market liberalisation (price decontrol, mass privatisation, trade opening) under weak institutions produces large short-run welfare losses—rising mortality, falling life expectancy, rising inequality, and collapsing output—that may persist for at least a decade, compared to gradual reformers or non-reformers at similar initial income levels.
free_market_shock_therapy_social_cost
regulatory.product_market_competitionregulatory.trade_opennessfiscal.spending_level
partial
Following the 1989-1992 collapse of the Soviet bloc, post-communist countries that adopted market reforms rapidly (Poland, Estonia, Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia, Latvia, Lithuania — the "fast reformers") experienced faster recovery in life expectancy at birth than countries that reformed slowly or retained state-socialist economic structures (Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, Moldova, Kazakhstan — the "slow reformers").
post_soviet_market_reform_life_expectancy
regulatory.product_market_competitioninstitutional.property_rightsregulatory.trade_openness
pending
Germany's Agenda 2010 labour-market reforms worked within the Ordoliberal framework precisely because they preserved collective-bargaining institutions and vocational-training architecture; the same reforms imposed on UK-style labour markets produced larger inequality increases.
labour_market_reform_institutional_complementarity
regulatory.labour_market_flexibilityregulatory.trade_opennessregulatory.product_market_competition
partial
Deng's 1978 reforms succeeded not through pure market liberalisation but through dual-track pricing, TVE experimentation, and SEZ strategic openings — a gradualist-pragmatist pattern that pure shock-therapy could not reproduce in post-Soviet economies.
gradualist_vs_shock_therapy_transition_outcomes
regulatory.trade_opennessregulatory.product_market_competitioninstitutional.property_rights
pending
US GDP per capita (PPP, constant $) exceeds the EU15 weighted average by approximately 50% as of 2023, with the gap widening from ~20% in 2000 after converging during 1980-1995.
us_eu_gdp_per_capita_divergence_policy_causes
regulatory.product_market_competitionregulatory.trade_opennessregulatory.energy_supply_security
partial
Across emerging-market and developing economies 1990-2020, higher expropriation risk — measured by ICRG expropriation risk index, Heritage investment-freedom score, and political-risk ratings — predicts shorter investment horizons (higher share of short-term investment, lower share of structures and machinery) and lower capital intensity in tradable sectors.
expropriation_risk_investment_horizon
institutional.property_rightsregulatory.trade_opennessinstitutional.rule_of_law
partial
Large welfare states sustain long-run real GDP per capita growth when paired with market flexibility (low product- and labour-market barriers), trade openness, and fiscal discipline (debt-to-GDP below 90%), but not when paired with rigid product and labour markets, in an OECD and rich- country panel 1980-2020.
welfare_state_market_flexibility_complement
fiscal.spending_levelregulatory.trade_opennessfiscal.transfer_expansion
partial
Peru's 1990-1995 Fujimori shock-therapy package (price liberalisation, fiscal stabilisation under the August 1990 "Fujishock", Brady-style external debt restructuring 1996-1997, large-scale privatisation of SOEs, central-bank independence under the 1993 constitution, and trade liberalisation) produced a structural break in inflation and real-GDP per capita relative to Peru's 1985-1990 hyperinflation trajectory and relative to a Latin American peer pool that did not adopt comparable packages on the same timeline.
peru_fujimori_shock_therapy_1990_2000
regulatory.product_market_competitioninstitutional.property_rightsregulatory.trade_openness
partial
Vietnam's post-Doi Moi economic growth (1986-2020) is more strongly associated with private-sector enterprise entry, trade openness, and market-oriented reforms than with state-owned-enterprise (SOE) expansion or continued state direction.
vietnam_doi_moi_private_sector_growth_share
regulatory.trade_opennessinstitutional.property_rightsregulatory.product_market_competition
supported
Higher transition-era rule-of-law scores are positively associated with higher log GDP per capita within the post-Soviet and Eastern European transition cohort after country and year fixed effects; Estonia/Poland-style inclusive-institution build-out should outperform partial extraction persistence cases such as Russia and Ukraine.
post_soviet_transition_institutional_variation
institutional.rule_of_lawinstitutional.property_rightsregulatory.trade_openness
partial
Global value chain (GVC) participation predicts real GDP per capita income upgrading when firms can enter and exit freely, but not when rents are reserved for protected incumbents, in a panel of developing and emerging economies 1990-2020.
global_value_chain_participation_upgrade
regulatory.trade_opennessregulatory.product_market_competitioninstitutional.rule_of_law
pending

Key texts