IESET.
Movements·japan_takaichi_ldp_2025_present

Takaichi LDP government and Second Takaichi Cabinet

JPN·2025present·LDP-led government; Second Takaichi Cabinet current as of 18 February 2026
Leaders: Sanae Takaichi (Prime Minister) · Kimi Onoda (Minister for Economic Security) · Koichiro Gemba (Minister of Finance)
positionsdevelopmentalismordoliberalclassical_liberal

Doctrine — stated goals and content

Takaichi-era LDP governing programme centred on what the Prime Minister describes as "responsible proactive public finances": a high initial FY2026 budget with defence, child policy, semiconductor, GX, science, and economic-security allocations, combined with a stated primary-balance and bond-issuance discipline. The February 2026 policy speech frames the administration around crisis-management investment, a new growth strategy for 17 strategic fields, a CFIUS-like inbound-investment review system, nuclear-and-renewable energy security, and stronger control of critical supply chains. The governing content is therefore conservative-industrial: large targeted public investment and national-security screening, partial household relief through education and energy measures, and continued defence build-up, offset by explicit concern about fiscal sustainability.

Policy-content fingerprint — how the framework codes this movement on its axes

spending level
fiscal.spending_level
General government spending as share of GDP, excluding transfers already captured under fiscal.transfer_expansion to avoid double-counting.
increased · moderate
higher spending share
FY2026 total budget rises to JPY122.3tn, with defence, child policy, GX, semiconductor, science, and contingency increases.
sectoral subsidy
fiscal.sectoral_subsidy
Targeted industrial and sectoral subsidies (renewable energy, chip manufacturing, agriculture, green hydrogen, etc).
increased · strong
expanded sectoral subsidies
Semiconductor support, GX upfront investment, critical-products funding, and energy-price support expand targeted public support.
~
transfer expansion
fiscal.transfer_expansion
Size of cash and near-cash transfer programmes (unemployment benefits, means-tested assistance, universal child benefits). Architecturally distinct from forced-saving schemes — see condition welfare_architecture.
mixed · weak
Free education, school lunches, and livelihood-assistance top-ups expand household support while medical cost-sharing reforms restrain benefits.
sectoral licensing
regulatory.sectoral_licensing
Sector-specific licensing regimes, concentration / quota allocation, state-controlled entry (energy, telecoms, healthcare, banking).
increased · moderate
tighter sectoral licensing / more state gating
CFIUS-like investment review and critical-supply-chain controls tighten state gating in security-sensitive sectors.
trade openness
regulatory.trade_openness
Trade policy openness — tariffs, non-tariff barriers, FTAs, industrial protection.
decreased · weak
more protectionist
Inbound-investment and supply-chain review are security-targeted rather than broad protectionism, but narrow openness at the margin.
energy supply security
regulatory.energy_supply_security
Policy posture toward energy supply security — domestic production capacity, import diversification, strategic reserves, nuclear stance, fossil-fuel mix discipline.
increased · moderate
higher supply-security posture (diversified, strategic reserves)
Maximum use of nuclear and renewables, LNG-source diversification, and electricity/gas price reserves strengthen supply-security posture.

Policies enacted

Schools of thought aligned or opposed

aligned
developmentalism
Strategic public-private investment, semiconductors, GX, critical products, and economic-security screening are mission-oriented industrial policy.
partial
ordoliberal
The fiscal rhetoric stresses bond and primary-balance discipline, but the policy mix remains subsidy-heavy.
opposed
classical_liberal
Sectoral subsidies, investment screening, and crisis-management industrial policy are not market-neutral.

References

Notes

Created in the second-tranche Asia pass because the first Lane B pass found that official Kantei pages no longer showed Ishiba as current. Start year is 2025 because the FY2026 draft budget was approved under the Takaichi administration before the Second Takaichi Cabinet page dated 18 February 2026; exact first-cabinet date should be refined if a stable Kantei archive page is added later.