IESET.
Movements·uk_brexit_2016_2020

Brexit — UK departure from EU

GBR·20162020·Cross-party referendum (2016); Conservative governments under May and Johnson delivered
Leaders: David Cameron (called referendum) · Theresa May (PM 2016–2019, negotiated withdrawal) · Boris Johnson (PM 2019–2022, delivered withdrawal + TCA)
positionsdevelopmentalismmarxianmarxist_leninistpost_keynesiandemocratic_socialistempirical_pragmatistclassical_liberalordoliberalaustrianchicago_monetarisminstitutionalismmarket_socialistsocial_democratic

Doctrine — stated goals and content

Formal departure from the EU Single Market and Customs Union; re- imposition of trade frictions with the largest trading partner in exchange for regulatory autonomy + ending free movement of labour. The stated economic rationale was that regulatory autonomy + global- trade repositioning would offset single-market access loss; the OBR and most academic forecasts projected a ~4% long-run GDP level reduction relative to EU membership.

Policy-content fingerprint — how the framework codes this movement on its axes

trade openness
regulatory.trade_openness
Trade policy openness — tariffs, non-tariff barriers, FTAs, industrial protection.
decreased · strong
more protectionist
Trade frictions re-imposed with EU; services access materially reduced.
immigration openness
regulatory.immigration_openness
Immigration policy openness — work visas, family reunification, asylum processing, border enforcement posture.
decreased · moderate
more restrictive (lower caps, tighter enforcement)
End of EU free movement; points-based system replaced it (net migration has subsequently risen via non-EU routes, producing mixed effect on some metrics).
~
product market competition
regulatory.product_market_competition
Product-market regulation, entry barriers, licensing burdens, network-industry regulation, price controls.
mixed
Regulatory autonomy used inconsistently — some liberalisation (gene editing, financial services) but also continued alignment on many standards to preserve EU access.

Policies enacted

What the data says — linked outcome hypotheses

The movement's outcome claims are tied to these hypotheses. Verdicts update as models run.

inconclusive
uk_economic_decline_multi_movement
INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — treatment 'uk_post_2008' has no within-country variation under country fixed effects

Schools of thought aligned or opposed

opposed
developmentalism
derived: score=-0.85, overlap=3 axes vs developmentalism profile (mechanical backfill v1)
aligned
marxian
derived: score=+0.64, overlap=2 axes vs marxian profile (mechanical backfill v1)
aligned
marxist_leninist
derived: score=+0.74, overlap=2 axes vs marxist_leninist profile (mechanical backfill v1)
aligned
post_keynesian
derived: score=+0.84, overlap=3 axes vs post_keynesian profile (mechanical backfill v1)
partial
democratic_socialist
derived: score=+0.23, overlap=3 axes vs democratic_socialist profile (mechanical backfill v1)
partial
empirical_pragmatist
derived: score=-0.24, overlap=3 axes vs empirical_pragmatist profile (mechanical backfill v1)
opposed
classical_liberal
derived: score=-0.50, overlap=3 axes vs classical_liberal profile (mechanical backfill v1)
partial
ordoliberal
derived: score=+0.25, overlap=3 axes vs ordoliberal profile (mechanical backfill v1)
opposed
austrian
derived: score=-0.61, overlap=3 axes vs austrian profile (mechanical backfill v1)
opposed
chicago_monetarism
derived: score=-0.69, overlap=2 axes vs chicago_monetarism profile (mechanical backfill v1)
opposed
institutionalism
derived: score=-1.00, overlap=2 axes vs institutionalism profile (mechanical backfill v1)
opposed
market_socialist
derived: score=-0.77, overlap=2 axes vs market_socialist profile (mechanical backfill v1)
opposed
social_democratic
derived: score=-0.89, overlap=3 axes vs social_democratic profile (mechanical backfill v1)

References