IESET.
Hypotheses·growth·liberalisation_episodes_growth_trajectory

Across cross-country liberalisation episodes since 1971 (trade opening, product-market deregulation, state-owned-enterprise divestiture, financial account liberalisation), output growth follows the reform rather than preceding it — i.e.

the observed growth pickup is policy-caused and not driven by reverse causation where successful economies reform because they can afford to. Tested via event-study across liberalisation-episode panel with pre-trend checks.

REFUTEDengine/runs/liberalisation_episodes_growth_trajectory

refuted — Both the post-reform growth pickup and the clean-pre-trend conditions fail. h=3 -0.47pp (p=0.30); h=5 +1.99pp (p=0.17); h=10 +0.34pp (p=0.68). Pre-trends: h=-3 -1.28pp; h=-5 +5.62pp.

confidence cueThis test cuts against the claim as written or misses its pre-declared threshold.

policy briefNeeds review

In ordinary language

Over a long period, do more market-oriented institutions translate into higher income or productivity, once the comparison looks beyond a single success story?

plain answer

The data did not support the prediction. Both the post-reform growth pickup and the clean-pre-trend conditions fail.

why it matters

Growth claims can look convincing in single success stories. This test asks whether the pattern survives a broader comparison.

how the test works

It compares 41 country or place units from 1971 to 2019, using a event study design, with fixed effects for country and year.

what was measured
What changed
  • Liberalisation episode indicator
  • Trade openness
What we checked
  • Log income pc cost-of-living adjusted
  • Real income growth
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/liberalisation_episodes_growth_trajectory
Loading chart…

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

2 schools list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

pre-registered
first-spec commit 4c8ce8e · 2026-07-18T22:11:21Z

Across cross-country liberalisation episodes since 1971 (trade opening, product-market deregulation, state-owned-enterprise divestiture, financial account liberalisation), output growth follows the reform rather than preceding it — i.e. the observed growth pickup is policy-caused and not driven by reverse causation where successful economies reform because they can afford to. Tested via event-study across liberalisation-episode panel with pre-trend checks.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

PRIMARY (dispositive): the hypothesis is SUPPORTED if event-study coefficients on real GDP-per-capita log-growth (excess over the country sample-mean baseline) are each at least +0.5pp/yr AND statistically positive at p<0.10 (country-block bootstrap) at horizons h=3, h=5, AND h=10, AND the pre-trend coefficients at h=-3 and h=-5 are NOT significantly positive (i.e. either p>=0.10 against the zero null or magnitude < +0.5pp). REFUTED if any post-reform coefficient at h=3,5,10 fails the magnitude OR the significance test, OR if either pre-trend at h=-3,-5 is significantly positive (the reverse-causation indicator). INFORMATIVE: per-horizon coefficients, SEs, and number of cells in diagnostics.json. METHOD_VALID: at least 30 EFW-jump episodes detected across the 41-country sample.

formal test & threshold
test:      liberalisation_episode_event_study_dual_threshold
threshold: PRIMARY: coef[h] >= +0.005 AND p[h] < 0.10 for h in {3,5,10}; AND not (coef[h] >= +0.005 AND p[h] < 0.10) for h in {-3,-5}.

Method

Template
event_study
Fixed effects
country, year
Clustering
country
Sample
41 countries · 19712019
Evidence type
associational

Stacked event-study across liberalisation-episode panel since 1971. Outcome: real GDP per capita growth at horizons h ∈ {-5,-3,0,3,5,10}. Pre-trend tests at h=-5,-3 distinguish policy causation from reverse causation. Episodes coded from Sachs-Warner trade-openness, IMF capital-account, and product-market deregulation indicators.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
log_gdp_pc_ppp
outcome
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KDtier 2
log
real_gdp_growth
outcome
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZGtier 2
level
liberalisation_episode_indicator
treatment
fraser_efw:aggregate_scoretier 4
indicator
trade_openness
treatment
world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2
level
log_initial_gdp_pc
control
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2
log
log_population
control
world_bank_wdi:SP.POP.TOTLtier 2
log
rule_of_law
control
wgi:RL.ESTtier 4
level
gross_capital_formation_pct_gdp
control
world_bank_wdi:NE.GDI.TOTL.ZStier 2
level

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

Liberalisation episodes and growth trajectory

Verdict: refuted — Both the post-reform growth pickup and the clean-pre-trend conditions fail. h=3 -0.47pp (p=0.30); h=5 +1.99pp (p=0.17); h=10 +0.34pp (p=0.68). Pre-trends: h=-3 -1.28pp; h=-5 +5.62pp.

Summary

  • Episodes detected: 31 across 31 countries (year of largest 5-year jump in Fraser EFW aggregate score per country, conditional on jump ≥ +0.5 points).
  • Method validity: OK — event study estimates GDP-per-capita log-growth deviation from country mean at horizons [-5, -3, 0, 3, 5, 10].

Event-study coefficients (excess log-growth over country baseline)

| Horizon h | Coef | SE | p | n cells | |---:|---:|---:|---:|---:| | -5 | +5.62pp | 2.29pp | 0.004 | 31 | | -3 | -1.28pp | 0.58pp | 0.028 | 31 | | +0 | +4.39pp | 1.72pp | 0.000 | 31 | | +3 | -0.47pp | 0.47pp | 0.300 | 31 | | +5 | +1.99pp | 1.56pp | 0.170 | 31 | | +10 | +0.34pp | 0.66pp | 0.676 | 29 |

Method

  • Treatment: liberalisation episode at the country-year of the LARGEST 5-year jump in Fraser EFW aggregate score (efw_summary) per country, conditional on that jump being ≥ +0.5 points. One episode per country (the EFW panel is 5-year-spaced 1970-2000 and annual after, so 5 yr is the natural unit; one-per-country prevents stacked-event-study double-counting of the same multi-decade reform wave).
  • Outcome: real GDP-per-capita log-growth (year-on-year), preferring NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD (PPP) and falling back to NY.GDP.PCAP.KD where PPP is missing. 2020 dropped (COVID).
  • Event study: per (country, episode, h), average growth in years e+h ± 1, demean by country sample mean, then average across (country, episode) cells. Country-block bootstrap (1000 reps) for SE / two-sided p-values.
  • Falsification rule (sharpened): SUPPORTED requires h ∈ {3,5,10} all ≥ +0.5pp/yr AND p<0.1; AND pre-trend at h ∈ {-3,-5} not significantly positive. REFUTED if either condition fails.

Data

  • fraser_efw:efw_panel (Economic Freedom of the World, aggregate score)
  • world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD (PPP per-capita GDP)
  • world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD (constant-USD per-capita GDP, fallback)

Caveats

  • Episode catalogue is derived from EFW jumps, which is an indicator-based (not narrative) coding. Spec mentions Sachs-Warner and Wacziarg-Welch dating; those would refine the catalogue but are not on disk.
  • Event horizons constrained by EFW coverage (most countries from 1980; pre-1980 episodes therefore underweighted).
  • Country baseline-demeaning absorbs slow-moving country-fixed differences; richer two-way FE would need iterative within-estimation. Block-bootstrap by country mimics country-clustered SEs.

Notes

Seeded from a classical-liberal claim that growth follows liberalisation rather than precedes it. Stacked event study; episode catalogue (inclusion criteria for what counts as a liberalisation episode) is the central judgement call requiring human review before pre-registration.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.