IESET.
Hypotheses·regulatory·eu_cbam_export_competitiveness_2023_onwards

The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — reporting phase from October 2023, certificate-purchase phase from 2026 — raises the effective landed cost of EU-manufactured CBAM-covered products (steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, hydrogen, electricity) in extra-EU markets because (a) EU producers face the full EU ETS carbon price without free-allocation offsets during the phase-out and (b) EU exports to non-CBAM jurisdictions face cost disadvantages from embedded-carbon-cost pass-through.

This hypothesis tests whether EU exports of CBAM-covered products to non-EU markets declined relative to exports from non-CBAM jurisdictions (US, Turkey, India, China) over 2023-2024, and whether EU domestic production in CBAM-covered subsectors contracted. The hypothesis does NOT claim CBAM is net-welfare-reducing — its intended function (preventing carbon leakage) is outside the outcome set — only that the competitiveness channel moves in the predicted direction.

WEAKLY SUPPORTEDengine/runs/eu_cbam_export_competitiveness_2023_onwards

WEAKLY SUPPORTED — ATT = -0.0215 log but pre-trend fails; effect identification unreliable.

confidence cueThe result is useful, but not decisive. Treat it as a clue, not a settled conclusion.

policy briefNeeds review

In ordinary language

In plain terms, this asks whether eu post 2023q4 cbam dummy is actually linked to better or worse log cbam covered export value from 2018 to 2024.

plain answer

The data clearly moved in the predicted direction. ATT = -0.0215 log but pre-trend fails; effect identification unreliable.

why it matters

This matters because regulatory claims should change belief only when they survive a pre-declared empirical test.

how the test works

It compares 17 country or place units from 2018 to 2024, using a did chaisemartin design, with fixed effects for country and year and hs product code.

what was measured
What changed
  • Eu post 2023q4 cbam dummy
  • Product is cbam covered flag
What we checked
  • Log cbam covered export value
  • Cbam covered export share of total
  • Log domestic production cbam subsectors
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/eu_cbam_export_competitiveness_2023_onwards
1007550250201820212024DEUFRAITAESPNLDBELPOL
illustrative sketch · run pending
No coefficients yet. When the model fires, this chart will show log_cbam_covered_export_value across 17 sampled countries over 20182024.
The shapes above are stylised — none of the lines are real data.
Placeholder for eu_cbam_export_competitiveness_2023_onwards. Published chart will be generated from engine/runs/eu_cbam_export_competitiveness_2023_onwards/chart_data.json.

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

17 schools list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

pre-registered
first-spec commit 4c8ce8e · 2026-07-18T22:11:21Z

The EU Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) — reporting phase from October 2023, certificate-purchase phase from 2026 — raises the effective landed cost of EU-manufactured CBAM-covered products (steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, hydrogen, electricity) in extra-EU markets because (a) EU producers face the full EU ETS carbon price without free-allocation offsets during the phase-out and (b) EU exports to non-CBAM jurisdictions face cost disadvantages from embedded-carbon-cost pass-through. This hypothesis tests whether EU exports of CBAM-covered products to non-EU markets declined relative to exports from non-CBAM jurisdictions (US, Turkey, India, China) over 2023-2024, and whether EU domestic production in CBAM-covered subsectors contracted. The hypothesis does NOT claim CBAM is net-welfare-reducing — its intended function (preventing carbon leakage) is outside the outcome set — only that the competitiveness channel moves in the predicted direction.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

Not supported if (a) the triple-interaction β is zero or positive at p<0.10 (EU CBAM-covered exports did not fall differentially post-2023Q4), OR (b) the effect vanishes after controlling for gas price and ETS price (suggesting gas/carbon-cost pass-through rather than CBAM-specific effect), OR (c) pre-trend placebo detects spurious divergence before 2023Q4, OR (d) domestic CBAM-subsector production shows no corresponding contraction (suggesting exports re-routed to EU-internal demand rather than production-destroyed). If export fall exists but is concentrated in subsectors with independent shocks (e.g., only steel during Chinese dumping), the attribution to CBAM is weak and should be reported as such.

formal test & threshold
test:      cbam_export_competitiveness_triple_did
threshold: β_triple_interaction < -0.05 log points at p<0.10 AND robust to gas + ETS price controls AND pre-trend placebo |t| < 1.65

Method

Template
did_chaisemartin
Fixed effects
country, year, hs_product_code
Clustering
country
Sample
17 countries · 20182024
Evidence type
causal

Primary specification: triple-difference — EU vs non-EU × pre-2023Q4 vs post-2023Q4 × CBAM-covered vs non-CBAM-covered products, within country-product-year panel. Triple-interaction coefficient identifies the differential EU CBAM-product export shift. Non-CBAM EU products serve as within-EU control for EU-wide shocks; non-EU countries serve as cross-border control for CBAM-product common demand shocks. Secondary: synthetic control on EU aggregate CBAM-covered exports using non-EU donor pool. Event-study around October 2023. Identification relies on the timing of CBAM phase-in being orthogonal to non-regulatory demand shocks — weakly true for 2023Q4 but confounded by gas-shock residual, Chinese overproduction spillover, and Ukraine-war-related steel-trade disruption. Year FE absorb common shocks; product FE absorb sector-mix differences. Known limitations: (1) CBAM certificate-purchase phase starts 2026 — the 2023-2024 "treatment" is the reporting phase only, which has administrative cost but not direct price effect. True price-effect hypothesis runs in v2 post-2026. (2) Steel and fertiliser markets have independent disruption (Chinese overproduction in steel; gas-price-driven fertiliser capacity mothballing). Disentangling CBAM signal from these is hard at v1. (3) Carbon-leakage-prevention (CBAM's intended function) is NOT measured in this outcome set. If EU CBAM exports fall AND non-EU carbon-intensive producers lose share in EU markets, CBAM may be working as designed — this hypothesis only measures one side.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
log_cbam_covered_export_value
outcome
constructed:UN Comtrade HS-code aggregation — iron/steel (72-73), aluminium (76), cement (2523), fertilisers (31), hydrogen (280410)tier 5
log
cbam_covered_export_share_of_total
outcome
constructed:CBAM-covered export value / total goods export value by country-year (UN Comtrade).tier 5
level
log_domestic_production_cbam_subsectors
outcome
constructed:OECD STAN — ISIC C24 (basic metals) + C23 (non-metallic minerals, covers cement) + C20 (chemicals, covers fertilisers) ptier 5
log
eu_post_2023q4_cbam_dummy
treatment
constructed:indicator = 1 for EU member states from 2023Q4 (CBAM reporting phase start) onwards. Non-EU countries = control.tier 5
indicator
product_is_cbam_covered_flag
treatment
constructed:HS-code indicator = 1 if product is in CBAM scope (iron/steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, hydrogen, electricity). Etier 5
indicator
log_population
control
world_bank_wdi:SP.POP.TOTLtier 2
log
trade_openness
control
world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2
level
eu_ets_carbon_price_eur
control
constructed:EU ETS December future settlement, EUR/tCO2, annual average. Fetcher pending (ICE or EEX).tier 5
log
real_effective_exchange_rate
control
bis:WS_EERtier 2
level

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

Result card — eu_cbam_export_competitiveness_2023_onwards

Estimator: differences.ATTgt (Callaway-Sant'Anna binary)
N obs: 180
N treated: 9
N controls: 9
Period: [2015, 2024]
Outcome: log_exp_pc

Overall ATT (Callaway-Sant'Anna SimpleAggregation)

  • ATT (simple): -0.0215 log points
  • ATT (post 0..10 mean): -0.0215

Event-study profile

Full event-time records in diagnostics.json. Selected rows:

| event time | ATT | 95% lower | 95% upper | |---:|---:|---:|---:| | -5 | 0.0031 | -0.0161 | 0.0222 | | -4 | 0.0222 | 0.0084 | 0.0360 | | -3 | -0.0130 | -0.0707 | 0.0448 | | -2 | 0.0380 | -0.0162 | 0.0922 | | -1 | 0.0132 | -0.0197 | 0.0461 | | 0 | -0.0148 | -0.0435 | 0.0139 | | 1 | -0.0282 | -0.0731 | 0.0168 |

Pre-trend test

  • Max abs ATT in pre-window (-5..-2): 0.0380
  • Pre-trend pass (zero inside all pre-period 95% CIs): False

Verdict

WEAKLY SUPPORTED — ATT in expected direction but pre-trend fails; weaken claim

Falsification rule (from YAML)

Not supported if (a) the EU-CBAM β is zero or positive at p<0.10, OR (b) effect vanishes after controlling for gas + ETS price, OR (c) pre-2023 placebo detects spurious divergence, OR (d) domestic CBAM-subsector production shows no contraction. Threshold: β < -0.05 log points at p<0.10. v1 uses aggregate-exports proxy.

Secondary outcome — log industrial VA per capita

  • ATT (simple) = -0.0084 log points
  • Pre-trend pass: False

v1 verdict (overrides lib helper auto-verdict)

WEAKLY SUPPORTED — ATT = -0.0215 log but pre-trend fails; effect identification unreliable.

Caveats — v1 is a pre-registration

  • Aggregate exports of goods+services is the coarse proxy; CBAM scope is HS-code-specific (steel, aluminium, cement, fertilisers, hydrogen, electricity).
  • 2023-2024 is the reporting phase only (admin cost, no certificate purchase). Author prior was low for v1.
  • v2 post-2026 will run with certificate-phase active and HS-level Comtrade data.
  • Pre-period 2015-2022 contains COVID + gas-shock; identification rests on year-FE absorbing common shocks.

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Notes

Data readiness: - UN Comtrade HS-level bilateral trade — fetcher pending - OECD STAN subsector production — fetcher pending - EU ETS price series — fetcher pending (ICE or EEX) - BIS REER — ready - WDI — ready This is a v1 pre-registration of methodology. The substantive test runs in v2 once 2026-2027 data are available (certificate-purchase phase active).

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.