Pre-registration
Following El Salvador's perceived success with the régimen de excepción (March 2022 onward) and the homicide-rate collapse, multiple Latin American jurisdictions enacted Bukele-style emergency measures: Honduras (Estado de Excepción in select municipalities, December 2022), Ecuador (Estado de Excepción + designation of gangs as terrorist organisations, January 2024), Peru (Estado de Emergencia in Lima/Callao, 2023-). The pre-registered claim is that across the imitator countries (HND, ECU, PER), homicide rates decline measurably (>20% reduction vs pre-treatment 3-year average) within 24 months of declaration AND that institutional quality (WGI rule of law, V-Dem judicial independence, Freedom House score) deteriorates by at least 0.10 SD over the same window — the rule-of-law cost of the security intervention. The cross-country DiD tests whether the Bukele model generalises beyond SLV with consistent benefit-and-cost magnitudes.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
Two-channel pre-registered test: BENEFIT-CHANNEL: refuted if pooled imitator-cohort ATT on log_homicide_rate at 24 months post-treatment is greater than -0.20 (less than 20% reduction). COST-CHANNEL: refuted if pooled imitator-cohort ATT on combined institutional-quality index (z-score average of WGI rule-of-law + V-Dem judicial independence + FH civil liberties) at 24 months is less negative than -0.10 SD. Joint hypothesis (Bukele-model-generalises-with-bundled-cost): supported only if BOTH channels meet their thresholds. Mixed outcomes (one channel only) are reported separately.
formal test & threshold
test: callaway_santanna_did_two_channel_imitator_cohort threshold: homicide_log_ATT_24m <= -0.20 AND institutional_quality_ATT_24m <= -0.10 SD
Method
- Template
did_callaway_santanna- Clustering
country- Sample
- 11 countries · 2015 – 2026
- Evidence type
- causal
Primary: Callaway-Sant'Anna staggered-adoption DiD with HND, ECU, PER as treated cohorts (different start dates) and the never-treated LatAm donor pool as control. Outcomes estimated separately: (a) log_homicide_rate, (b) WGI rule of law, (c) V-Dem judicial independence. Secondary: synth_did per treated unit individually with the donor pool. Tertiary: cross-channel correlation — does a larger homicide reduction co-occur with a larger rule-of-law decline?
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
homicide_rate_log outcome | unodc:intentional_homicidetier 2 owid:homicide-rate-unodctier 2 | log_level |
wgi_rule_of_law outcome | wgi:GOV_WGI_RL.ESTtier 4 | level |
vdem_judicial_independence outcome | vdem:v2juhcindtier 4 vdem:v2juncindtier 4 | level |
freedom_house_civil_liberties outcome | freedom_house:cl_scoretier 4 | level |
bukele_imitation_indicator treatment | constructed:country-specific binary; HND from 2022-12, ECU from 2024-01, PER from 2023-Q1; 0 otherwisetier 5 | country_specific_binary |
pre_treatment_homicide_level control | unodc:intentional_homicidetier 2 | pre_treatment_5yr_avg |
us_policy_rate control | fred:FEDFUNDStier 1 | level |
commodity_terms_of_trade control | world_bank_wdi:TT.PRI.MRCH.XD.WDtier 2 | log_change |
gdp_per_capita_log control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KDtier 2 | log_level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — latam_bukele_imitation_effect_homicide_security_state
Verdict: PARTIAL — ATT=+0.03571, p=0.598, N=99, treated_countries=1 (above α=0.10)
Pre-registration
- Claim: Following El Salvador's perceived success with the régimen de excepción (March 2022 onward) and the homicide-rate collapse, multiple Latin American jurisdictions enacted Bukele-style emergency measures: Honduras (Estado de Excepción in select municipalities, December 2022), Ecuador (Estado de Excepción + designation of gangs as terrorist organisations, January 2024), Peru (Estado de Emergencia in Lima/Callao, 2023-). The pre-registered claim is that across the imitator countries (HND, ECU, PER), homicide rates decline measurably (>20% reduction vs pre-treatment 3-year average) within 24 months of declaration AND that institutional quality (WGI rule of law, V-Dem judicial independence, Freedom House score) deteriorates by at least 0.10 SD over the same window — the rule-of-law cost of the security intervention. The cross-country DiD tests whether the Bukele model generalises beyond SLV with consistent benefit-and-cost magnitudes.
- Falsification rule: Two-channel pre-registered test: BENEFIT-CHANNEL: refuted if pooled imitator-cohort ATT on log_homicide_rate at 24 months post-treatment is greater than -0.20 (less than 20% reduction). COST-CHANNEL: refuted if pooled imitator-cohort ATT on combined institutional-quality index (z-score average of WGI rule-of-law + V-Dem judicial independence + FH civil liberties) at 24 months is less negative than -0.10 SD. Joint hypothesis (Bukele-model-generalises-with-bundled-cost): supported only if BOTH channels meet their thresholds. Mixed outcomes (one channel only) are reported separately.
Estimate (Callaway-Sant'Anna staggered DiD, TWFE approximation)
- coefficient: 0.03571157509025548
- std_error: 0.06764153943648907
- p_value: 0.5975317378134577
- n_obs: 99
- n_countries: 11
- r_squared_within: 0.9828034330139964
- fe_entity: True
- fe_time: True
- cluster: country
- method: Callaway-Sant'Anna TWFE fallback (linearmodels failed: No module named 'linearmodels')
- n_treated_countries: 1
- cohort_years: [2022]
- dropped_controls_due_to_overlap: ['us_policy_rate']
Variables resolved
wgi:GOV_WGI_RL.EST→ wgi_rule_of_law (outcome, n=5296)fred:FEDFUNDS→ us_policy_rate (controls, n=73)world_bank_wdi:TT.PRI.MRCH.XD.WD→ commodity_terms_of_trade (controls, n=6478)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.PP.KD→ gdp_per_capita_log (controls, n=8325)
Missing data
unodc:intentional_homicide; owid:homicide-rate-unodc(outcome)vdem:v2juhcind; vdem:v2juncind(outcome)freedom_house:cl_score(outcome)constructed: country-specific binary; HND from 2022-12, ECU from 2024-01, PER from 2023-Q1; 0 otherwise(treatment)unodc:intentional_homicide(controls)
Generated by scripts/run_did_callaway_santanna.py at 2026-04-30T13:28:09+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
This is the canonical generalisation test. SLV is the original treated unit (excluded from the imitator panel as the trend-setter); HND, ECU, PER are the imitator units. Donor pool comprises non-imitating LatAm states (CRI, GTM, MEX, COL, BRA, CHL, ARG, URY) where the homicide-channel intervention is absent or much milder. The hypothesis's two-way test (homicide benefit AND rule-of-law cost) prevents a one-sided framing.