Pre-registration
Countries with larger PMR declines from 2018 to 2023 saw faster PDB labour-productivity growth in the following window.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
Estimate `lp_growth_2018_2024 ~ pmr_decline_2018_2023` on the landed OECD PDB vintage; expected sign: positive. SUPPORTED requires the pre-registered sign at p<0.10 or the named dominance criterion; otherwise the result is partial or weak.
formal test & threshold
test: oecd_pdb_batch03_oecd_pdb_market_reform_productivity_compounder threshold: p<0.10 with pre-registered sign, except dominance tests compare the named contribution magnitudes
Method
- Template
descriptive- Fixed effects
- Clustering
country- Sample
- 31 countries · 2018 – 2024
- Evidence type
- associational
Local first-pass throughput screen; upgrade robustness before scoreboard conversion.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
lp_growth_2018_2024 outcome | oecd:OECD.SDD.TPStier 2 | growth_or_level_as_named |
pmr_decline_2018_2023 treatment | oecd_pmr:OECD.ECO.GCRDtier 4 | lagged_level_or_change_as_named |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
PMR reform productivity compounder
Verdict: REFUTED_OR_WEAK
Claim: Countries with larger PMR declines from 2018 to 2023 saw faster PDB labour-productivity growth in the following window.
Test: lp_growth_2018_2024 ~ pmr_decline_2018_2023
Sample: n=31, countries=31, years=None–None.
Key coefficients
pmr_decline_2018_2023: beta=-1.827, p=0.198, 90/95 CI approx [-4.612, 0.9568]
Data: oecd:OECD.SDD.TPS,DSD_PDB@DF_PDB,2.0 from data/vintages/oecd/DSD_PDB@2026-05-12T133454Z.parquet.
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.