IESET.
Hypotheses·growth·oecd_pdb_market_reform_productivity_compounder

Countries with larger PMR declines from 2018 to 2023 saw faster PDB labour-productivity growth in the following window.

RUN PENDINGengine/runs/oecd_pdb_market_reform_productivity_compounder

Result card available.

confidence cueResult card produced; verdict unclassified.

policy briefNeeds review

In ordinary language

Over a long period, do more market-oriented institutions translate into higher income or productivity, once the comparison looks beyond a single success story?

plain answer

Result available.

why it matters

Growth claims can look convincing in single success stories. This test asks whether the pattern survives a broader comparison.

how the test works

It compares 31 country or place units from 2018 to 2024, using a descriptive design.

what was measured
What changed
  • Pmr decline 2018 2023
What we checked
  • Lp growth 2018 2024
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/oecd_pdb_market_reform_productivity_compounder
1007550250201820212024AUSAUTBELCANCHECZEDEU
illustrative sketch · run pending
No coefficients yet. When the model fires, this chart will show lp_growth_2018_2024 across 31 sampled countries over 20182024.
The shapes above are stylised — none of the lines are real data.
Placeholder for oecd_pdb_market_reform_productivity_compounder. Published chart will be generated from engine/runs/oecd_pdb_market_reform_productivity_compounder/chart_data.json.

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

4 schools list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

pre-registered
first-spec commit c48dfd6 · 2026-05-13T10:43:00Z

Countries with larger PMR declines from 2018 to 2023 saw faster PDB labour-productivity growth in the following window.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

Estimate `lp_growth_2018_2024 ~ pmr_decline_2018_2023` on the landed OECD PDB vintage; expected sign: positive. SUPPORTED requires the pre-registered sign at p<0.10 or the named dominance criterion; otherwise the result is partial or weak.

formal test & threshold
test:      oecd_pdb_batch03_oecd_pdb_market_reform_productivity_compounder
threshold: p<0.10 with pre-registered sign, except dominance tests compare the named contribution magnitudes

Method

Template
descriptive
Fixed effects
Clustering
country
Sample
31 countries · 20182024
Evidence type
associational

Local first-pass throughput screen; upgrade robustness before scoreboard conversion.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
lp_growth_2018_2024
outcome
oecd:OECD.SDD.TPStier 2
growth_or_level_as_named
pmr_decline_2018_2023
treatment
oecd_pmr:OECD.ECO.GCRDtier 4
lagged_level_or_change_as_named

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Detailed result card

PMR reform productivity compounder

Verdict: REFUTED_OR_WEAK

Claim: Countries with larger PMR declines from 2018 to 2023 saw faster PDB labour-productivity growth in the following window.

Test: lp_growth_2018_2024 ~ pmr_decline_2018_2023

Sample: n=31, countries=31, years=None–None.

Key coefficients

  • pmr_decline_2018_2023: beta=-1.827, p=0.198, 90/95 CI approx [-4.612, 0.9568]

Data: oecd:OECD.SDD.TPS,DSD_PDB@DF_PDB,2.0 from data/vintages/oecd/DSD_PDB@2026-05-12T133454Z.parquet.

Strongest opposing argument

Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.