Pre-registration
Peru's 2001-2019 growth window — under five different administrations (Toledo, García II, Humala, PPK, Vizcarra) that all preserved the 1993 macroeconomic constitution (inflation-targeting central bank, fiscal-responsibility framework, open trade and capital account) — delivered cumulative real-GDP-per-capita growth in the top quartile of Latin America despite high political turnover. The pre-registered claim is that institutional persistence (constraint on the executive to deviate from the macro framework) is the binding factor: log GDP-pc growth 2001-2019 exceeds the LATAM median by at least 0.20 log-points, AND the dispersion of macro outcomes (inflation, fiscal balance) under five administrations is lower than the within-administration dispersion of typical Latin American countries on a 5-year basis. The mechanism is that pre-committed institutions (central-bank independence, fiscal rule, open trade) outperform discretionary populist swings even when populist political pressure is high.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
Not supported if (a) cumulative log_gdp_pc_constant 2001-2019 (Peru minus LATAM median) is < 0.20, OR (b) within-Peru standard deviation of fiscal_balance_share_gdp 2001-2019 is not below the median LATAM within-country SD, OR (c) cpi_inflation_yoy in Peru 2001-2019 exceeds an annual mean of 4% (target ceiling).
formal test & threshold
test: panel_fe_plus_macro_dispersion_test threshold: cumulative_log_gdp_pc(PER, 2001-2019) - cumulative_log_gdp_pc(LATAM_median, 2001-2019) >= 0.20 AND mean_cpi_inflation_yoy(PER, 2001-2019) <= 4.0 AND within_PER_SD_fiscal_balance(2001-2019) <= median_LATAM_within_SD_fiscal_balance(2001-2019)
Method
- Template
panel_fe- Clustering
country- Sample
- 10 countries · 2001 – 2024
- Evidence type
- causal
Primary: panel_fe of log_gdp_pc on country and year FE plus Peru-indicator interacted with year. Secondary: variance-decomposition showing within-Peru macro dispersion across five administrations is below the LATAM median within-country dispersion. Tertiary: descriptive ranking of cumulative log GDP-pc growth 2001-2019 among the donor pool.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
log_gdp_pc_constant outcome | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | log |
cpi_inflation_yoy outcome | world_bank_wdi:FP.CPI.TOTL.ZGtier 2 | level |
fiscal_balance_share_gdp outcome | imf:GGXCNL_NGDPtier 2 | level |
wgi_government_effectiveness outcome | wgi:GOV_WGI_GE.ESTtier 4 | level |
terms_of_trade control | world_bank_wdi:TT.PRI.MRCH.XD.WDtier 2 | level |
copper_price control | fred:PCOPPUSDMtier 1 | log_level |
us_policy_rate control | fred:FEDFUNDStier 1 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — peru_post_fujimori_growth_2001_2019
Verdict: INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — treatment 'context_inferred_treatment' has no within-country variation under country fixed effects
Pre-registration
- Claim: Peru's 2001-2019 growth window — under five different administrations (Toledo, García II, Humala, PPK, Vizcarra) that all preserved the 1993 macroeconomic constitution (inflation-targeting central bank, fiscal-responsibility framework, open trade and capital account) — delivered cumulative real-GDP-per-capita growth in the top quartile of Latin America despite high political turnover. The pre-registered claim is that institutional persistence (constraint on the executive to deviate from the macro framework) is the binding factor: log GDP-pc growth 2001-2019 exceeds the LATAM median by at least 0.20 log-points, AND the dispersion of macro outcomes (inflation, fiscal balance) under five administrations is lower than the within-administration dispersion of typical Latin American countries on a 5-year basis. The mechanism is that pre-committed institutions (central-bank independence, fiscal rule, open trade) outperform discretionary populist swings even when populist political pressure is high.
- Falsification rule: Not supported if (a) cumulative log_gdp_pc_constant 2001-2019 (Peru minus LATAM median) is < 0.20, OR (b) within-Peru standard deviation of fiscal_balance_share_gdp 2001-2019 is not below the median LATAM within-country SD, OR (c) cpi_inflation_yoy in Peru 2001-2019 exceeds an annual mean of 4% (target ceiling).
- Falsification test: panel_fe_plus_macro_dispersion_test
Estimate
- Error: treatment 'context_inferred_treatment' has no within-country variation under country fixed effects
Variables resolved
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD→ log_gdp_pc_constant (outcome, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=12104)world_bank_wdi:FP.CPI.TOTL.ZG→ cpi_inflation_yoy (outcome, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=7550)imf:GGXCNL_NGDP→ fiscal_balance_share_gdp (outcome, publisher=imf, n=8848)world_bank_wgi:GOV_WGI_GE.EST→ wgi_government_effectiveness (outcome, publisher=wgi, n=5168)world_bank_wdi:TT.PRI.MRCH.XD.WD→ terms_of_trade (controls, publisher=world_bank_wdi, n=6478)fred:PCOPPUSDM→ copper_price (controls, publisher=fred, n=350)fred:FEDFUNDS→ us_policy_rate (controls, publisher=fred, n=730)
Generated by scripts/run_panel_fe.py at 2026-06-29T17:52:59+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
Tests whether macro-framework persistence under non-aligned political administrations produces a measurable growth premium.