IESET.
Hypotheses·growth·pinochet_chile_rapid_liberalisation_growth_collapse

Pinochet-era Chile's rapid liberalisation programme (1973-1982) produced an initial growth collapse culminating in the 1975 recession and the 1982 banking-and-debt crisis, with sustained recovery only after selective state re-engagement (copper-sector re-nationalisation, Banco del Estado expansion, pension-system guarantee backstopping).

The pure-Chicago prescription underperformed East Asian developmentalist peers over 1973-1990 on growth, volatility, and financial-stability metrics.

PARTIALengine/runs/pinochet_chile_rapid_liberalisation_growth_collapse

PARTIAL — mean_gap=+0.3637, |gap|/pre_sd=6.2, p_perm=1; claim direction ambiguous

confidence cueThe result is useful, but not decisive. Treat it as a clue, not a settled conclusion.

policy briefMixed or noisy

In ordinary language

Over a long period, do more market-oriented institutions translate into higher income or productivity, once the comparison looks beyond a single success story?

plain answer

The evidence is suggestive but not decisive. mean_gap=+0.3637, |gap|/pre_sd=6.2, p_perm=1; claim direction ambiguous

why it matters

Growth claims can look convincing in single success stories. This test asks whether the pattern survives a broader comparison.

how the test works

It compares 7 country or place units from 1965 to 1995, using a synth did design.

what was measured
What changed
  • Pinochet chicago treated
What we checked
  • Log income pc cost-of-living adjusted
  • Real income growth
  • Gross capital formation pct income
what this does not prove

A single test is not the whole truth. It narrows the claim under a specific sample, time period, and method. Strong policy conclusions need the pattern to survive nearby tests, alternative data, and serious objections.

verification

No evidence packet has been generated yet.

Results

engine/runs/pinochet_chile_rapid_liberalisation_growth_collapse
1007550250196519801995CHLKORTWNSGPMYSTHAIDN
illustrative sketch · run pending
No coefficients yet. When the model fires, this chart will show log_gdp_pc_ppp across 7 sampled countries over 19651995.
The shapes above are stylised — none of the lines are real data.
Placeholder for pinochet_chile_rapid_liberalisation_growth_collapse. Published chart will be generated from engine/runs/pinochet_chile_rapid_liberalisation_growth_collapse/chart_data.json.

Who has skin in the game — schools predicting on this

1 school list this hypothesis as a test of their position. The chips below are school-level scoreboard outcomes, not a second hypothesis verdict.

hypothesis verdict vs scoreboard outcome

The banner verdict judges this hypothesis as written. The scoreboard asks whether each school's polarity-corrected prediction was right. Raw status is not a school win: SUPPORTED supports schools that needed SUPPORTED, but refutes schools that needed REFUTED.

Pre-registration

registration ordering unverified
first-spec commit 4c8ce8e · 2026-07-18T22:11:21Z
run generated · 2026-04-27T10:41:19Z
Run timestamp predates this path's first git-add commit (rebase, rename, or pre-git local run). Spec hash is still the path's first-add commit — not repository HEAD — but ordering is not a clean pre-registration proof.

Pinochet-era Chile's rapid liberalisation programme (1973-1982) produced an initial growth collapse culminating in the 1975 recession and the 1982 banking-and-debt crisis, with sustained recovery only after selective state re-engagement (copper-sector re-nationalisation, Banco del Estado expansion, pension-system guarantee backstopping). The pure-Chicago prescription underperformed East Asian developmentalist peers over 1973-1990 on growth, volatility, and financial-stability metrics.

Falsification criterion — what would disprove this

set before the run · honoured after

This hypothesis is considered falsified if:

The hypothesis is SUPPORTED if synthetic-control estimate of Chile's cumulative real GDP per capita growth 1973-1990 underperforms an East Asian donor pool by at least 20% AND the 1982 banking-crisis output cost exceeds 10% of GDP (consistent with pure-Chicago prescription underperforming). REFUTED if Chile outperforms or the crisis cost is below 5% of GDP.

formal test & threshold
test:      Synth-DID with CHL treated 1973 vs East Asian donor pool {KOR,TWN,SGP,MYS,THA,IDN}; outcome cumulative real GDP per capita 1973-1990 and 1982 banking-crisis output cost; falsified if synth gap below 20% or crisis cost below 5% of GDP.

Method

Template
synth_did
Clustering
none
Sample
7 countries · 19651995
Evidence type
associational

Chile treated 1973-1990; East Asian donor pool (KOR, TWN, SGP, MYS). Outcomes: cumulative real GDP per capita, output volatility, banking- crisis output cost. Tests whether pure-Chicago liberalisation underperformed selective developmentalist comparators.

Data

VariableSourceTransform
log_gdp_pc_ppp
outcome
maddison:gdppc_ppptier 3
log
real_gdp_growth
outcome
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.MKTP.KD.ZGtier 2
level
gross_capital_formation_pct_gdp
outcome
world_bank_wdi:NE.GDI.TOTL.ZStier 2
level
tfp_index
outcome
pwt:rtfpnatier 3
level
pinochet_chicago_treated
treatment
constructed:indicator = 1 for CHL, years 1973-1990 (Pinochet/Chicago Boys window)tier 5
indicator
copper_price_index
control
imf_pcps:PCOPPtier 1
log
trade_openness
control
world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2
level
log_population
control
world_bank_wdi:SP.POP.TOTLtier 2
log
log_initial_gdp_pc
control
world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2
log

ready  ·  pending  ·  reconstruct-needed

Notes

Seeded from a developmentalist claim that Pinochet-era Chile's pure-Chicago liberalisation 1973-1982 produced an initial growth collapse and the 1982 banking crisis, with sustained recovery only after selective state re-engagement. Synth-DID against East Asian developmentalist peers; human review needed for the East Asian donor pool selection.

Authored framework. Read the transparency note.