Pre-registration
India under the Modi government (2014-) has reversed elements of the 1991-2007 tariff-liberalisation trajectory: weighted applied tariffs rose from ~13% in 2014 to ~18% by 2022 (according to WTO and WDI tariff measures), with Production-Linked Incentive schemes adding non-tariff protection. The claim is that India's trade-openness ratio has stagnated or fallen relative to a synthetic-control donor pool of comparable emerging economies over 2014-2023.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if (a) WDI weighted applied tariff for India rises by >=3 pp from 2014 to 2022, AND (b) trade-openness change 2014-2019 (pre-COVID) underperforms the comparator-mean change. PARTIAL if (a) holds but (b) does not. REFUTED if (a) does not hold (i.e. tariffs did not rise).
formal test & threshold
test: descriptive_india_2014_2023_tariff_and_openness threshold: PRIMARY: tariff_change(2014->2022) >= +3 pp AND openness_change(2014->2019, IND) < openness_change(2014->2019, comparator_mean).
Method
- Template
descriptive- Clustering
none- Sample
- 10 countries · 2005 – 2023
- Evidence type
- descriptive
Descriptive comparison. India's trade-openness 2014-2023 vs matched emerging-market comparators. Reports the weighted-tariff trajectory as a direct treatment-intensity measure.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
trade_openness_pct_gdp outcome | world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2 | level |
merchandise_imports_pct_gdp outcome | world_bank_wdi:NE.IMP.GNFS.ZStier 2 | level |
weighted_applied_tariff outcome | world_bank_wdi:TM.TAX.MRCH.WM.AR.ZStier 2 | level |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.