Pre-registration
NAFTA (effective 1994-01-01) raised Mexican manufacturing value-added and merchandise-export intensity over the 1994-2007 pre-China-shock window relative to a synthetic-control pool of Latin American non-NAFTA economies. The Heckscher-Ohlin / Krugman-style claim is that bilateral preferential access to the US market combined with rules-of-origin-driven supply-chain integration shifted Mexico's tradeable-sector composition toward manufacturing exports faster than its non-NAFTA peers. Wage and aggregate-employment effects are documented to be small and heterogeneous; the cleaner first-order signal is on manufacturing-sector value-added share and goods-export intensity.
Falsification criterion — what would disprove this
This hypothesis is considered falsified if:
SUPPORTED if both (a) the SC gap on log manufacturing value-added is positive and persistent (>=5% gap by 2000) AND (b) the SC gap on merchandise-exports-share-of-GDP is positive and persistent (>=3 percentage points by 2000). PARTIAL if (b) holds but (a) does not — exports rose but production did not deepen, consistent with maquila-shell critique. REFUTED if Mexico under-performs the synthetic control on both metrics.
formal test & threshold
test: synthetic_control_mexico_vs_latam_donor_pool threshold: PRIMARY: SC_gap(log_manufacturing_va, 2000) >= 0.05 AND SC_gap(merchandise_exports_share, 2000) >= 0.03. INFORMATIVE: placebo permutation p-value < 0.10.
Method
- Template
synthetic_control- Clustering
country- Sample
- 13 countries · 1985 – 2007
- Evidence type
- causal
Synthetic-control estimator for Mexico against a Latin American donor pool of non-NAFTA middle-income economies. Pre-treatment fitting window 1985-1993; post-treatment evaluation 1994-2007. Placebo permutation test across the donor pool reports p-values. Robustness: drop the 1994-1995 Tequila-crisis years from the post-window to ensure the synthetic gap is not devaluation-driven.
Data
| Variable | Source | Transform |
|---|---|---|
log_manufacturing_value_added outcome | world_bank_wdi:NV.IND.MANF.KDtier 2 | log |
merchandise_exports_pct_gdp outcome | world_bank_wdi:TX.VAL.MRCH.CD.WTtier 2 | share_of_gdp |
trade_openness_pct_gdp outcome | world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZStier 2 | level |
nafta_indicator treatment | constructed:indicator = 1 for MEX from 1994 onward; 0 elsewheretier 5 | indicator |
log_gdp_pc_pretreatment control | world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KDtier 2 | log_level_at_treatment_minus_1 |
investment_share control | world_bank_wdi:NE.GDI.TOTL.ZStier 2 | level |
real_effective_exchange_rate control | imf:REERtier 2 | log |
● ready · ● pending · ● reconstruct-needed
Detailed result card
Result card — trade_lib_nafta_1994_mexico_manufacturing_employment
Verdict: SUPPORTED — sign matches claim +, mean_gap=+3.33, |gap|/pre_sd=31, p_perm=0.0769
Pre-registration
- Claim: NAFTA (effective 1994-01-01) raised Mexican manufacturing value-added and merchandise-export intensity over the 1994-2007 pre-China-shock window relative to a synthetic-control pool of Latin American non-NAFTA economies. The Heckscher-Ohlin / Krugman-style claim is that bilateral preferential access to the US market combined with rules-of-origin-driven supply-chain integration shifted Mexico's tradeable-sector composition toward manufacturing exports faster than its non-NAFTA peers. Wage and aggregate-employment effects are documented to be small and heterogeneous; the cleaner first-order signal is on manufacturing-sector value-added share and goods-export intensity.
- Falsification rule: SUPPORTED if both (a) the SC gap on log manufacturing value-added is positive and persistent (>=5% gap by 2000) AND (b) the SC gap on merchandise-exports-share-of-GDP is positive and persistent (>=3 percentage points by 2000). PARTIAL if (b) holds but (a) does not — exports rose but production did not deepen, consistent with maquila-shell critique. REFUTED if Mexico under-performs the synthetic control on both metrics.
Synthetic-control estimate
- shape: synth_did
- treated_country: MEX
- event_year: 1994
- n_donors: 12
- donor_weights (top): {'GTM': 0.75, 'COL': 0.158, 'HND': 0.0921, 'ARG': 0.0, 'BRA': 0.0}
- pre_rmse: 3.3737362464139067
- pre_period_sd: 0.10833605362780394
- mean_post_gap: 3.330220783494018
- end_period_gap: 3.2494505142745425
- post_period_years: [1994, 2007]
- placebo_p_value: 0.07692307692307693
- n_placebos: 12
- method: synthetic-control via NNLS, permutation inference
Variables resolved
world_bank_wdi:NV.IND.MANF.KD→ log_manufacturing_value_added (outcome, n=8624)world_bank_wdi:TX.VAL.MRCH.CD.WT→ merchandise_exports_pct_gdp (outcome, n=14446)world_bank_wdi:NE.TRD.GNFS.ZS→ trade_openness_pct_gdp (outcome, n=10714)constructed: indicator = 1 for MEX from 1994 onward; 0 elsewhere→ nafta_indicator (treatment, n=299)world_bank_wdi:NY.GDP.PCAP.KD→ log_gdp_pc_pretreatment (controls, n=14066)world_bank_wdi:NE.GDI.TOTL.ZS→ investment_share (controls, n=10428)
Generated by scripts/run_synth_did.py at 2026-05-15T20:30:49+00:00
Strongest opposing argument
Every hypothesis ships with its charitable opposing argument. The framework earns credibility by handling objections at their strongest, not weakest.
Notes
Pre-2008 evaluation window is deliberate — the post-2001 China WTO-accession shock is the single largest confound for any NAFTA evaluation, and treating it as part of the NAFTA effect would conflate two separate trade shocks.