Ease of hiring/firing, collective-bargaining scope, minimum wage rigidity, temporary/permanent contract regulation.
Size of cash and near-cash transfer programmes (unemployment benefits, means-tested assistance, universal child benefits). Architecturally distinct from forced-saving schemes — see condition welfare_architecture.
Targeted industrial and sectoral subsidies (renewable energy, chip manufacturing, agriculture, green hydrogen, etc).
Under PM Poul Nyrup Rasmussen (Social Democrats) + Labour Minister Jytte Andersen, Denmark formalised the 'flexicurity' model: weak employment-protection law (easy firing) combined with generous unemployment insurance (up to 90% wage replacement short-run, eventually reduced) and active labour-market policy (ALMP — training + activation + job-matching services). Denmark's approach became the canonical contrast to continental EU employment- protection-heavy models. Refinement D.2.9 explicitly cites Denmark pioneering flexicurity as a Nordic labour-market- flexibility feature distinguishing it from France / Italy.
Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.
Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".
Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.