Ease of hiring/firing, collective-bargaining scope, minimum wage rigidity, temporary/permanent contract regulation.
Size of cash and near-cash transfer programmes (unemployment benefits, means-tested assistance, universal child benefits). Architecturally distinct from forced-saving schemes — see condition welfare_architecture.
Tripartite agreement signed 14 June 2016 between the Sipilä government, employer federations (EK) and trade union confederations (SAK, STTK, Akava) to reduce Finnish unit labour costs by approximately 4 percent relative to euro-area competitors. Key elements: annual working time extended by 24 hours without compensation; a one-year wage freeze across sectoral agreements; shift of roughly 0.85 percentage points of social-security contributions from employers to employees phased 2017-2020; temporary 30 percent cut to public-sector holiday bonuses 2017-2019. Motivated by Finland's loss of cost competitiveness vis-a-vis Sweden and Germany after the Nokia contraction, 2012-2015 recession and 2014 Russian-sanction shock. Coverage reached ~91 percent of wage earners via sectoral ratifications.
Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.
Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".
Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.