General government spending as share of GDP, excluding transfers already captured under fiscal.transfer_expansion to avoid double-counting.
Size of cash and near-cash transfer programmes (unemployment benefits, means-tested assistance, universal child benefits). Architecturally distinct from forced-saving schemes — see condition welfare_architecture.
Ease of hiring/firing, collective-bargaining scope, minimum wage rigidity, temporary/permanent contract regulation.
Execution of the Second Economic Adjustment Programme (signed 14 March 2012 under the Papademos caretaker government, €130bn + €34bn PSI sweeteners) under the Samaras ND-PASOK (-DIMAR) coalition from June 2012. Principal vehicle for accelerated implementation was Law 4046/2012 (initial prior actions, February 2012 under Papademos) and Law 4093/2012 (Medium-Term Fiscal Framework 2013-2016, 7 November 2012) legislating €13.5bn of additional austerity measures across 2013-2014: public-sector wage cuts (notably on special wage regimes), pension cuts of 5-15% above €1,000/month, abolition of Easter/summer/Christmas bonuses, public-employment reduction (mandatory exits, reserve labour mobility scheme), retirement-age rise from 65 to 67, extensive tax-base-broadening. Twelfth and thirteenth reviews under Troika closed 2013-2014 releasing programme disbursements. Primary-surplus achievement 2013 confirmed April 2014 (0.4% GDP on programme definition) used to fund limited 'social dividend' transfers. Five-year sovereign bond issued April 2014 at 4.95% (€3bn, 6.1x oversubscribed) signalled conditional market re- entry. Troika-review deadlock autumn 2014 triggered the presidential-election gambit of December 2014.
Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.
Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".
Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.