IESET.
Policies·fr_pension_reform_2010

Woerth pension reform — legal age 60 → 62

FRA·2010 ·enacted 2010-11-09·UMP majority (Fillon government)candidate
moveslabour market flexibilityspending level

What the policy did

Loi n° 2010-1330 du 9 novembre 2010 portant réforme des retraites. Raised the legal retirement age from 60 to 62 (phased to 2018) and the full-rate age from 65 to 67, tightened contribution-period requirements, and made incremental changes to special regimes. Enacted amid nationwide strikes and protests; became a core frame for the 2023 Macron-era extension to age 64.

Policy-content fingerprint — what this policy moved, on which axes

Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.

intended
labour market flexibility
regulatory.labour_market_flexibility
Ease of hiring/firing, collective-bargaining scope, minimum wage rigidity, temporary/permanent contract regulation.
increased · moderate
more flexible (easier hiring/firing, less rigid bargaining)
Higher retirement age raises effective labour supply at older ages.
spending level
fiscal.spending_level
General government spending as share of GDP, excluding transfers already captured under fiscal.transfer_expansion to avoid double-counting.
decreased · moderate
lower spending share
Intended long-run pension-deficit reduction.

Enacted by

Empirical evidence — linked hypotheses

Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".

Countries with stricter employment protection legislation — measured by the OECD EPL indicator (or comparable alternatives where OECD EPL is missing) — experience longer average unemployment duration, holding other controls constant.
labour_market_flexibility_unemployment_durationinferred
viaregulatory.labour_market_flexibility
INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — interaction term requested but no loadable constructed interaction variable is defined. The generic panel_fe runner would otherwise …
run pending
Strong employment-protection legislation (EPL) with high union wage-setting coverage and limited at-will dismissal produces a three-order causal chain in Southern European labour markets.
strong_union_labour_law_youth_unemployment_south_europeinferred
viaregulatory.labour_market_flexibilityfiscal.spending_level
PARTIAL — coef=+2.943, p=0.252 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive
partial
In a broad-country panel 1990-2019, greater labour-market flexibility — measured by lower OECD EPL overall strictness, higher ease-of-hiring scores, and absence of centralized wage bargaining — predicts higher employment-to- population ratios and faster real GDP per capita growth, controlling for institutional quality, education, and trade openness.
labour_market_flexibility_employment_growth_panelinferred
viaregulatory.labour_market_flexibility
PARTIAL — coef=-1.251, p=0.162 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial
Large welfare states sustain long-run real GDP per capita growth when paired with market flexibility (low product- and labour-market barriers), trade openness, and fiscal discipline (debt-to-GDP below 90%), but not when paired with rigid product and labour markets, in an OECD and rich- country panel 1980-2020.
welfare_state_market_flexibility_complementinferred
viafiscal.spending_levelregulatory.labour_market_flexibility
PARTIAL — coef=+3.308e-18, p=0.653; effect magnitude effectively zero
partial
Germany's Agenda 2010 labour-market reforms worked within the Ordoliberal framework precisely because they preserved collective-bargaining institutions and vocational-training architecture; the same reforms imposed on UK-style labour markets produced larger inequality increases.
labour_market_reform_institutional_complementarityinferred
viaregulatory.labour_market_flexibility
PARTIAL — coef=-7.366e+04, p=0.927 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial
Labour-market flexibility (ease of hiring and firing, low EPL, decentralised wage bargaining) improves long-run employment rates, productivity growth, and GDP per capita only when paired with complementary adjustment institutions: active labour-market policy (retraining, job search assistance), relocation support, or income-smoothing mechanisms (unemployment insurance, portable benefits).
labour_flexibility_security_complementinferred
viaregulatory.labour_market_flexibility
PARTIAL — coef=+1.306e-16, p=0.339; effect magnitude effectively zero
partial
Spain's February 2012 labour reform (Real Decreto-Ley 3/2012: dismissal-cost reduction from 45 to 33 days/year, decentralised collective bargaining, "objective causes" expansion) shortened the duration of the post-2011 unemployment surge by accelerating hiring rates 2014-2017 by at least 1.5 pp relative to a synthetic control of euro-area peripheral peers, without producing a permanent reduction in real wages relative to donors.
labour_reform_spain_2012_dismissal_cost_employmentinferred
viaregulatory.labour_market_flexibilityfiscal.spending_level
PARTIAL — mean_gap=+10.36, |gap|/pre_sd=1.8, p_perm=0.286; claim direction ambiguous
partial
At high-income levels (GDP per capita above OECD median), very high tax burdens — defined as total tax revenue above 40% of GDP — predict weaker long-run total factor productivity growth unless paired with unusually high state capacity (top tercile WGI Government Effectiveness) and high labour- market flexibility (top tercile OECD EPL), in an OECD and high-income panel 1980-2020.
tax_burden_frontier_growth_non_linearinferred
viaregulatory.labour_market_flexibilityfiscal.spending_level
PARTIAL — coef=+0.01059, p=0.585 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial

Similar historical policies

Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.