General government spending as share of GDP, excluding transfers already captured under fiscal.transfer_expansion to avoid double-counting.
Progressivity of the personal income tax schedule, including top marginal rates, bracket spread, and targeted credits (EITC-equivalents).
Size of cash and near-cash transfer programmes (unemployment benefits, means-tested assistance, universal child benefits). Architecturally distinct from forced-saving schemes — see condition welfare_architecture.
Product-market regulation, entry barriers, licensing burdens, network-industry regulation, price controls.
Third Economic Adjustment Programme for Greece signed 19 August 2015 via the European Stability Mechanism (ESM Financial Assistance Facility Agreement), €86bn envelope over three years. Preceded by the 5 July 2015 referendum in which 61.3% voted 'Oxi' (No) to the Eurogroup proposals, bank closure and capital controls from 28 June, and the 13 July 2015 Euro Summit agreement under which PM Tsipras accepted harsher terms than the rejected package. Prior-actions omnibus passed as Law 4336/2015 (14 August 2015) including VAT harmonisation (23% standard rate extended to restaurants, hotels raised to 13% then later), pension cuts (early-retirement thresholds tightened, supplementary-pension freeze), primary-surplus target trajectory culminating at 3.5% of GDP 2018-2022, automatic spending cuts if targets missed, privatisation fund restructured as Hellenic Corporation of Assets and Participations (HCAP, Law 4389/2016), household primary- residence protection narrowed, bank recapitalisation via HFSF €25bn under ESM direct lending, legislative timetable for product-market reforms (OECD toolkit III). Greece exited the programme 20 August 2018 into post-programme enhanced surveillance.
Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.
Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".
Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.