Rule of law as institutional substrate — contract enforcement, judicial independence, equal treatment before the law. Upstream of most other axes.
General government spending as share of GDP, excluding transfers already captured under fiscal.transfer_expansion to avoid double-counting.
Sequence of sovereign-credit rating actions in 2024 reflecting the institutional and fiscal fallout of the judicial-overhaul confrontation and the Gaza/multi-front war. Moody's: downgrade to A2 from A1 (9 Feb 2024) then two-notch cut to Baa1 with negative outlook (27 Sep 2024). S&P: A+ to A (18 Apr 2024), then A to A- (1 Oct 2024). Fitch: A+ to A (12 Aug 2024). Agencies cited geopolitical risk, fiscal deterioration, and weakened institutional governance. Not a policy in the legislative sense but a measurement of institutional-axis movement — included as a marker to anchor hypothesis-testing.
Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.
Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".
Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.
Coded as an outcome-measurement 'policy' stub — conventional practice in this repo is to track rating actions as institutional-axis markers.