Product-market regulation, entry barriers, licensing burdens, network-industry regulation, price controls.
Sector-specific licensing regimes, concentration / quota allocation, state-controlled entry (energy, telecoms, healthcare, banking).
Size of cash and near-cash transfer programmes (unemployment benefits, means-tested assistance, universal child benefits). Architecturally distinct from forced-saving schemes — see condition welfare_architecture.
Replaced dual-track Dutch healthcare financing (mandatory sickness funds for lower-income + private insurance for higher-income) with a universal mandatory private health insurance market. All residents must purchase a basic package from a regulated insurer. Insurers must accept all applicants (community rating); premiums are flat per insurer; risk-equalisation fund redistributes from low-risk to high-risk enrolees. Means-tested subsidy (zorgtoeslag) for lower- income households. Competing insurers offer supplementary coverage. Canonical market-respecting-mixed healthcare architecture. Refinement D.2.10 cites Netherlands as a country with less captured political economy implementing market-respecting healthcare reform.
Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.
Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".
Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.