IESET.
Policies·pe_ley_apci_ngo_restrictions_2024

Peru Ley APCI — NGO cooperation restrictions (2024)

PER·2024 2024·enacted 2025-04-11·Congressional coalition: Fuerza Popular, Alianza para el Progreso, Renovación Popular, Avanza País, executive assentcandidate
movesrule of law

What the policy did

Law N° 32301 (published 11 April 2025, approved in Congress in final form late 2024) amends the statute of the Agencia Peruana de Cooperación Internacional (APCI) to expand state oversight of non-governmental organisations receiving international cooperation funds. Key provisions: mandatory APCI registration and prior approval for all international- funded activities, broad grounds for cancellation of registration, prohibitions on using international cooperation resources for strategic litigation against the Peruvian state, expanded sanctions with fines up to 500 UIT, reporting obligations on expenditures. Critics (IACHR, UN Special Rapporteurs, Coordinadora Nacional de Derechos Humanos) argued the law restricts civic space and targets human-rights, environmental, and anti-corruption NGOs investigating executive conduct. Coded negative on institutional.rule_of_law via civil-society-oversight curtailment.

Policy-content fingerprint — what this policy moved, on which axes

Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.

intended
rule of law
institutional.rule_of_law
Rule of law as institutional substrate — contract enforcement, judicial independence, equal treatment before the law. Upstream of most other axes.
decreased · moderate
weaker rule of law
Restriction of strategic litigation against state; expansion of state gating over civil-society activity.

Enacted by

Empirical evidence — linked hypotheses

Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".

El Salvador's FDI inflow, real-GDP growth, tourism arrivals, and business-formation rate accelerated under the Bukele era (2019-2024) relative to a Central American peer-country donor pool (Honduras, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama, Dominican Republic).
bukele_fdi_gdp_investment_climate_2019_2024inferred
viainstitutional.rule_of_law
PARTIAL — mean_gap=-0.697, |gap|/pre_sd=1.2, p_perm=1 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)
partial
Following El Salvador's perceived success with the régimen de excepción (March 2022 onward) and the homicide-rate collapse, multiple Latin American jurisdictions enacted Bukele-style emergency measures: Honduras (Estado de Excepción in select municipalities, December 2022), Ecuador (Estado de Excepción + designation of gangs as terrorist organisations, January 2024), Peru (Estado de Emergencia in Lima/Callao, 2023-).
latam_bukele_imitation_effect_homicide_security_stateinferred
viainstitutional.rule_of_law
PARTIAL — ATT=+0.03571, p=0.598, N=99, treated_countries=1 (above α=0.10)
partial
Across a pre-registered panel of OECD and major emerging-market economies from 1996 to 2023, stronger rule-of-law institutions predict faster real GDP per capita growth after country and year fixed effects and basic macro controls.
market_order_rule_of_law_gdp_pc_growth_panelinferred
viainstitutional.rule_of_law
PARTIAL — coef=-0.08348, p=0.913 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial
Across a pre-registered panel of OECD and major emerging-market economies from 1996 to 2023, stronger rule-of-law institutions predict higher high-technology export intensity after country and year fixed effects and basic macro controls.
market_order_rule_of_law_high_tech_exports_panelinferred
viainstitutional.rule_of_law
PARTIAL — coef=+0.621, p=0.746 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial
Across a pre-registered panel of OECD and major emerging-market economies from 1996 to 2023, stronger rule-of-law institutions predict higher private and total investment shares after country and year fixed effects and basic macro controls.
market_order_rule_of_law_investment_share_panelinferred
viainstitutional.rule_of_law
PARTIAL — coef=-0.3477, p=0.814 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial
Across a pre-registered panel of OECD and major emerging-market economies from 1996 to 2023, stronger rule-of-law institutions predict deeper private credit intermediation after country and year fixed effects and basic macro controls.
market_order_rule_of_law_private_credit_depth_panelinferred
viainstitutional.rule_of_law
PARTIAL — coef=+4.153, p=0.513 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive
partial
El Salvador's second Bukele term (post-2024 inauguration, with continued régimen-de-excepción and worsening institutional-quality scores) maintains FDI inflows, GDP growth, and tourism arrivals trajectories established in 2019-2024 despite mounting authoritarianism critique (V-Dem electoral-democracy decline, WGI rule-of-law score continuing to fall, Freedom House "partly free" downgrade).
bukele_phase2_post_2024_authoritarian_growth_premiuminferred
viainstitutional.rule_of_law
PARTIAL — mean_gap=-0.3577, |gap|/pre_sd=0.051, p_perm=0.143 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)
partial
Across emerging-market and developing economies 1990-2020, stronger contract enforcement — measured by years to resolve a commercial dispute, contract-enforcement index, and legal-origin dummies — predicts whether foreign-direct-investment inflows produce productivity spillovers to domestic firms rather than enclave effects.
contract_enforcement_fdi_productivity_spilloversinferred
viainstitutional.rule_of_law
SUPPORTED — coef=+0.1145 (sign matches claim +), p=0.0196
supported

Similar historical policies

Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.

References