Sector-specific licensing regimes, concentration / quota allocation, state-controlled entry (energy, telecoms, healthcare, banking).
Targeted industrial and sectoral subsidies (renewable energy, chip manufacturing, agriculture, green hydrogen, etc).
Size of cash and near-cash transfer programmes (unemployment benefits, means-tested assistance, universal child benefits). Architecturally distinct from forced-saving schemes — see condition welfare_architecture.
General government spending as share of GDP, excluding transfers already captured under fiscal.transfer_expansion to avoid double-counting.
Bolivia's YPFB industrialisation policy, launched after the 2006 nationalisation Supreme Decree 28701, refounded Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales Bolivianos as the lead operator across the gas value chain and pursued downstream investments (urea-ammonia complex at Bulo Bulo, LNG and separation plants, lithium pilots through YLB) financed by IDH revenue and Treasury transfers. The intended effect was to capture more rents inside Bolivia, build domestic industrial capacity, and reduce reliance on foreign operators within the MAS extractivist model.
Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.
Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".
Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.