Policies·india_ibm_cocacola_expulsion_1977

IBM and Coca-Cola expulsion under FERA 1973 (India 1977)

IND·1977 – 1978·Janata Partycandidate

movestrade openness↓property rights↓product market competition↓

What the policy did

Under Janata government enforcement of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act 1973 — which required foreign companies to dilute equity to 40% Indian ownership — IBM and Coca-Cola rejected dilution and withdrew from India in 1977-1978. Domestic substitutes (CMC for IBM service contracts; Double Seven, Campa Cola, Thums Up for Coca-Cola) expanded to fill the gap. Cemented swadeshi-economic-nationalism trajectory until 1991.

Policy-content fingerprint — what this policy moved, on which axes

Per invariant 3, reforms are scored by what they did on each channel-separated axis, not by the party that enacted them. This fingerprint is how the policy-match engine finds historical analogues.

intended

↓

trade openness

regulatory.trade_openness

Trade policy openness — tariffs, non-tariff barriers, FTAs, industrial protection.

decreased · moderate

more protectionist

FERA 40% equity-dilution enforcement treated as quasi-trade barrier for foreign firms.

↓

property rights

institutional.property_rights

Security of private property rights — formal recognition, expropriation risk, titling systems.

decreased · moderate

weaker property rights

Compelled foreign equity dilution amounted to partial expropriation under law.

unintended / side-effect

↓

product market competition

regulatory.product_market_competition

Product-market regulation, entry barriers, licensing burdens, network-industry regulation, price controls.

decreased · weak · unintended

more restrictive regulation, higher entry barriers

Reduced competition from global majors in computing and beverages.

Enacted by

india_janata_desai_1977_1979

Empirical evidence — linked hypotheses

Explicit links are curated by the author. Inferred links are hypotheses in the library that test the same axes this policy moved — the framework's answer to "what does the data say about a policy like this?".

Estonia adopted among the most radical market-liberalisation packages of any post-Soviet state — flat tax (26% universal rate, 1994), currency board (EEK pegged to DM/EUR, 1992), rapid privatisation, unilateral free trade, and minimal capital controls — and by 2007 had recovered to Soviet-era GDP per capita levels and substantially exceeded them, while Belarusian and Ukrainian peers had not recovered comparably.

estonia_market_reform_post_soviet_growth_1991_2007inferred

viaregulatory.trade_opennessregulatory.product_market_competitioninstitutional.property_rights

PARTIAL — recovery threshold pass=True (year_recovered=1998, 2007 vs 1991 = 70.53282727739165); Baltic−CIS gap pass=False (gap=5.1509956229348575)

partial

Across a broad panel of economies 1980-2020, market reforms (privatisation, trade liberalisation, and price decontrol) produce durable gains in real GDP per capita growth only when rule-of-law scores exceed a minimum threshold (WGI Rule of Law > -0.5, approximately the 40th percentile of the global distribution).

rule_of_law_market_reform_complementarityinferred

viaregulatory.product_market_competitionregulatory.trade_opennessinstitutional.property_rights

REFUTED — coef=-0.1483 (sign opposite claim +), p=0.00481

refuted

Starting from comparable 1945 post-war conditions — same ethnicity, language, pre-war German institutional and industrial inheritance, and with the GDR inheriting a larger share of pre-war industrial capital in Saxony and Thuringia — the Federal Republic's Soziale Marktwirtschaft (Ordoliberal market economy with welfare state) versus the German Democratic Republic's planned economy with administered prices, state-enterprise production, and soft budget constraints produced by 1989 a canonical divergence that pattern-matches >=7 of 10 pre-registered extreme-outcome metrics, each drawn from a different publisher or methodology family.

west_east_germany_economic_system_divergence_1950_1989inferred

viainstitutional.property_rightsregulatory.product_market_competitionregulatory.trade_openness

INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — no outcome variable loaded; missing: ['derived: count of canonical_metrics with threshold met']

run pending

The Soviet central-planning system, having already exhibited TFP stagnation 1970-1989, underwent a canonical institutional and economic collapse 1989-1998 as plan-enforcement was withdrawn without functioning market institutions in place.

soviet_union_central_planning_gdp_collapse_1989_1991inferred

viaregulatory.product_market_competitioninstitutional.property_rights

INCONCLUSIVE_DATA_PENDING — no outcome variable loaded; missing: ['derived: count of canonical_metrics with threshold met']

run pending

Australia’s long expansion after the Hawke-Keating reforms (1983–1996) — including tariff cuts, financial deregulation, competition-policy introduction, and fiscal consolidation — is better predicted by market liberalisation than by sector-specific state direction.

australia_hawke_keating_reform_long_runinferred

viaregulatory.trade_opennessregulatory.product_market_competitioninstitutional.property_rights

PARTIAL — coef=-0.03935, p=0.076 (above α=0.05); direction inconclusive

partial

NZ Rogernomics 1984–1993 liberalisation (tariff removal, SOE corporatisation, financial-market liberalisation) produced productivity acceleration and real-income gains over 1990s–2000s relative to pre-reform trend.

nz_rogernomics_productivity_effectinferred

viaregulatory.trade_opennessinstitutional.property_rightsregulatory.product_market_competition

refuted — NZ synthetic-control log-TFP gap mean over 1995-2005 = -3.80% (<= 0); informative log GDP-pc gap = -22.70%. Productivity acceleration claim not suppor…

refuted

Singapore's long-run prosperity and frontier convergence are better predicted by extreme trade openness, strong rule of law, competitive product and services markets, and high economic freedom than by state ownership or industrial targeting alone.

singapore_state_capacity_market_openness_comboinferred

viaregulatory.trade_opennessinstitutional.property_rightsregulatory.product_market_competition

PARTIAL — coef=-0.0001143, p=0.713 (above α=0.1); direction inconclusive

partial

Chile’s long-run income convergence is stronger after the combination of market reforms (1975–1990) and democratic institutional repair (1990 onward) than under the earlier state-led import-substitution regime (1950–1973).

chile_market_reform_long_horizon_with_democracyinferred

viaregulatory.trade_opennessinstitutional.property_rightsregulatory.product_market_competition

PARTIAL — mean_gap=+5132, |gap|/pre_sd=15, p_perm=0.417 (gap below 0.5×pre_sd or placebo p≥0.10)

partial

Similar historical policies

Ranked by axis-fingerprint overlap with this policy. Direction match bolded — those are the closest historical analogues. Shape of the match is what drives policy-outcome comparison, not the country or party label.

X-2 campaign and socialist transformation of South Vietnam (1978)

VNM·1978

match

2.4

product market competitionproperty rightstrade openness

Syria Ba'ath nationalisations 1965

SYR·1965

match

2.3

property rightsproduct market competitiontrade openness

Bank, Trade, and Enterprise Nationalisation

LAO·1975